Paper · 2021 · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)

Studies on milling and baking quality and in-vitro protein digestibility of historical and modern wheats

Sujun Liu

17
claims
35
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

There is considerable controversy among the public and the scientific community about whether modern wheats are harmful for human health and responsible for the increase of Celiac disease compared with historical varieties. Therefore, the milling and baking quality, protein digestibility, and protein composition of historical and modern wheats adapted to the Great Plains of the US were evaluated in this thesis. One objective of this thesis was to determine how end-use quality of wheat changed with wheat cultivar release year. Kernel physical characteristics, milling yield, whole-wheat flour quality, flour protein content, mixing quality and baking quality of 23 hard winter wheat cultivars released in the Great Plains region of the US between 1870 and 2013 were evaluated. Several quality characteristics improved across release year, which is evidence of the impact of plant breeding efforts over the years. Specifically, wheat kernels have become harder, moister, more uniform in hardness but more variable in shape over a century of breeding. Bran quality decreased, which may have implications for whole grain quality and milling productivity. The baking quality remained constant despite a strong decrease in protein concentration. Another objective was to determine the change in in vitro protein digestibility during breeding and its relationship with wheat end-use quality. Digestibility of bread increased with release year and was significantly positively correlated with kernel diameter standard deviation, milling yield, Mixograph mixing peak time, and loaf firmness while negatively correlated with white flour protein content, Mixograph mixing peak value, and loaf volume. Flour protein digestibility had no relationship with release year and no correlation with end-use quality characteristics. High molecular weight protein increased while low molecular weight protein decreased as a function of release year. Several gluten proteins were associated with high digestibility which may need further study. In conclusion, the end-use quality improved during breeding somehow and some of them have positive correlation with protein digestibility which can be used for future wheat breeding selection. Advisor: Devin J. Rose

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several quality characteristics improved across wheat release year

Treatment
release yeare1
Outcome
quality characteristicse1
Direction
improvede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“Several quality characteristics improved across release year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–842 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat kernels became harder over a century of breeding

Treatment
over a century of breedinge2
Outcome
kernelse2
Direction
hardere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat kernels have become harder, moister, more uniform in hardness but more variable in shape over a century of breeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1053 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat kernels became moister over a century of breeding

Treatment
over a century of breedinge2
Outcome
kernelse2
Direction
moistere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat kernels have become harder, moister, more uniform in hardness but more variable in shape over a century of breeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1053 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel hardness became more uniform over a century of breeding

Treatment
over a century of breedinge2
Outcome
hardnesse2
Direction
more uniforme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat kernels have become harder, moister, more uniform in hardness but more variable in shape over a century of breeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1053 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel shape became more variable over a century of breeding

Treatment
over a century of breedinge2
Outcome
shapee2
Direction
more variablee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat kernels have become harder, moister, more uniform in hardness but more variable in shape over a century of breeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1053 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bran quality decreased in the wheat cultivars studied

Outcome
Bran qualitye3
Direction
decreasede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e3

“Bran quality decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1077 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baking quality remained constant despite a strong decrease in protein concentration

Outcome
baking qualitye4
Direction
remained constante4
Qualifier
despite a strong decrease in protein concentratione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e4

“The baking quality remained constant despite a strong decrease in protein concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein concentration of the wheat cultivars decreased strongly

Outcome
protein concentratione4
Direction
decreasee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e4

“The baking quality remained constant despite a strong decrease in protein concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1244 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digestibility of bread increased with wheat release year

Treatment
release yeare5
Outcome
Digestibility of breade5
Direction
increasede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e5

“Digestibility of bread increased with release year and was significantly positively correlated with kernel diameter standard deviation, milling yield, Mixograph mixing peak time, and loaf firmness while negatively correlated with white flour protein content, Mixograph mixing peak value, and loaf volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1694 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bread digestibility was positively correlated with kernel diameter standard deviation, milling yield and Mixograph mixing peak time

Treatment
kernel diameter standard deviation, milling yield, Mixograph mixing peak timee5
Outcome
Digestibility of breade5
Direction
positively correlatede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e5

“Digestibility of bread increased with release year and was significantly positively correlated with kernel diameter standard deviation, milling yield, Mixograph mixing peak time, and loaf firmness while negatively correlated with white flour protein content, Mixograph mixing peak value, and loaf volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1694 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bread digestibility was positively correlated with loaf firmness

Treatment
loaf firmnesse5
Outcome
Digestibility of breade5
Direction
positively correlatede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e5

“Digestibility of bread increased with release year and was significantly positively correlated with kernel diameter standard deviation, milling yield, Mixograph mixing peak time, and loaf firmness while negatively correlated with white flour protein content, Mixograph mixing peak value, and loaf volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1694 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bread digestibility was negatively correlated with white flour protein content, Mixograph mixing peak value and loaf volume

Treatment
white flour protein content, Mixograph mixing peak value, and loaf volumee5
Outcome
Digestibility of breade5
Direction
negatively correlatede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e5

“Digestibility of bread increased with release year and was significantly positively correlated with kernel diameter standard deviation, milling yield, Mixograph mixing peak time, and loaf firmness while negatively correlated with white flour protein content, Mixograph mixing peak value, and loaf volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1694 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flour protein digestibility had no relationship with release year

Treatment
release yeare6
Outcome
Flour protein digestibilitye6
Direction
no relationshipe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e6

“Flour protein digestibility had no relationship with release year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1761 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flour protein digestibility had no correlation with end-use quality characteristics

Treatment
end-use quality characteristicse7
Outcome
Flour protein digestibilitye6
Direction
no correlatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e6

“Flour protein digestibility had no relationship with release year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1761 · show in text ↑
e7

“no correlation with end-use quality characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1817 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High molecular weight protein increased with wheat release year

Treatment
release yeare0
Outcome
High molecular weight proteine0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“High molecular weight protein increased while low molecular weight protein decreased as a function of release year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1933 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low molecular weight protein decreased with wheat release year

Treatment
release yeare0
Outcome
low molecular weight proteine0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“High molecular weight protein increased while low molecular weight protein decreased as a function of release year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1933 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several gluten proteins were associated with high digestibility and may need further study

Gene
gluten proteinse0
Outcome
digestibilitye0
Qualifier
may need further studye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“modern wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“Several gluten proteins were associated with high digestibility which may need further study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1935–2027 · show in text ↑