Paper · 2021 · Vestnik of Kazan state agrarin university

INFLUENCE OF FUNGICIDAL TREATMENT ON YIELD AND GRAIN QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT

Irina Fadeeva; Ilyas Gazizov; Fail' Kurmakaev; et al.

20
claims
41
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In 2017-2019, studies were carried out in the Republic of Tatarstan to study the effect of fungicidal treatment on the yield and grain quality of new varieties of winter wheat. The experiment scheme provided for the study of the following options: variety (factor A) - Darina, Nadezhda, Universiade; fungicidal treatment with Titul Duo at a dose of 0.25 l / ha in the heading phase (factor B), years (factor C). The predecessor is pure steam. The soil in the experiment was gray forest, medium loamy. Content in the arable layer: humus (according to Tyurin) - 3.1-3.4%; pHsal. - 5.2-5.5; K2O (according to Kirsanov) - 122-145 mg / kg of soil, P2O5 (according to Kirsanov) - 262-271 mg / kg of soil. Plot area - 25 m2. The yield and quality of grain largely depend on the phytosanitary state of winter wheat crops, in particular, on the development of diseases. The prevalence and harmfulness of leaf-stem diseases in wheat largely depends on the temperature conditions during the growing season of the crop and on the moisture conditions. As a result of the development of diseases, there is a significant decrease not only in yield, but also a deterioration in the quality characteristics of wheat grain. The highest percentage of prevalence (85%) and intensity of development (45.7%) of powdery mildew was observed in the Universiade variety. Evaluation of plants showed a low lesion of the leaf surface by leaf rust: from 18.6% in the Nadezhda variety to 24.6% in the Universiade variety. The biological effectiveness of protective measures in winter wheat crops when treated with a fungicide has been calculated. On average for varieties for three years, the biological effectiveness of the use of the drug Title Duo was more than 90%. The fungicide treatment increased the yield on average for the studied varieties by 0.55 t / ha. The maximum increase in grain yield was obtained for the Universiade variety - 0.68 t / ha. Indicators of technological quality of grain with an average for varieties increased after treatment with fungicide sowing: weight of 1000 grains per 2.2 grams; grain nature by 5.4 g / l; glassiness by 2.6%; evenness by 1.4%; the wet gluten content is 1.6%. According to the results of analysis of variance, a significant influence of the conditions of the year on the indicators of the technological quality of grain was established: on the nature of the grain (56.8%), the total glassiness of the grain (51.43%), the mass of 1000 grains (51.4%) and the gluten deformation index (52.37%). To a lesser extent, environmental conditions influenced the evenness of the grain (22.0%) and the mass fraction of gluten in the grain (21.66%). At the same time, the contribution of the fungicide to the formation of indicators of the technological quality of grain varied from 7.69% (grain evenness) to 32.43% (gluten content). The grain nature by 14.99% was determined by the fungicidal treatment of crops and only by 10.61% depended on the genotype

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Universiade had the highest powdery mildew prevalence at 85%.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Universiadee0
Interactor
powdery mildewe0pathogen
Outcome
prevalencee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
85%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percentage of prevalence (85%) and intensity of development (45.7%) of powdery mildew was observed in the Universiade variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Universiade had the highest powdery mildew development intensity at 45.7%.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Universiadee0
Interactor
powdery mildewe0pathogen
Outcome
intensity of developmente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
45.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percentage of prevalence (85%) and intensity of development (45.7%) of powdery mildew was observed in the Universiade variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf rust lesion ranged from 18.6% in Nadezhda to 24.6% in Universiade.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Nadezhdae0
Interactor
leaf ruste0pathogen
Outcome
lesion of the leaf surface by leaf ruste0
Value
18.6%e0
Qualifier
24.6%e0
Comparator
Universiadee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low lesion of the leaf surface by leaf rust: from 18.6% in the Nadezhda variety to 24.6% in the Universiade variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Title Duo biological effectiveness exceeded 90% averaged across varieties and years.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Title Duoe0
Outcome
biological effectivenesse0
Direction
more thane0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average for varieties for three years, the biological effectiveness of the use of the drug Title Duo was more than 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1738 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide increased mean yield by 0.55 t / ha.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicide treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.55 t / hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungicide treatment increased the yield on average for the studied varieties by 0.55 t / ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1835 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Universiade had the maximum fungicide-associated grain-yield increase, 0.68 t / ha.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Universiadee0
Treatment
fungicide treatmente1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.68 t / hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum increase in grain yield was obtained for the Universiade variety - 0.68 t / ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1837–1927 · show in text ↑
e1

“fungicide treatment increased the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1783 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide raised thousand-grain weight by 2.2 grams.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatment with fungicidee0
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.2 gramse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indicators of technological quality of grain with an average for varieties increased after treatment with fungicide sowing: weight of 1000 grains per 2.2 grams”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1929–2088 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide raised grain nature by 5.4 g / l.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatment with fungicidee0
Outcome
grain naturee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.4 g / le0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased after treatment with fungicide sowing: weight of 1000 grains per 2.2 grams; grain nature by 5.4 g / l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2115 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide raised grain glassiness by 2.6%.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatment with fungicidee0
Outcome
glassinesse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased after treatment with fungicide sowing: weight of 1000 grains per 2.2 grams; grain nature by 5.4 g / l; glassiness by 2.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2135 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide raised grain evenness by 1.4%.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatment with fungicidee0
Outcome
evennesse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased after treatment with fungicide sowing: weight of 1000 grains per 2.2 grams; grain nature by 5.4 g / l; glassiness by 2.6%; evenness by 1.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2153 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide raised wet gluten content by 1.6%.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treatment with fungicidee0
Outcome
wet gluten contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased after treatment with fungicide sowing: weight of 1000 grains per 2.2 grams; grain nature by 5.4 g / l; glassiness by 2.6%; evenness by 1.4%; the wet gluten content is 1.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2185 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year conditions explained 56.8% of grain-nature variation.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
nature of the graine0
Value
56.8%e0
Setting
conditions of the yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant influence of the conditions of the year on the indicators of the technological quality of grain was established: on the nature of the grain (56.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2239–2398 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year conditions explained 51.43% of grain glassiness variation.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
total glassiness of the graine0
Value
51.43%e0
Setting
conditions of the yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant influence of the conditions of the year on the indicators of the technological quality of grain was established: on the nature of the grain (56.8%), the total glassiness of the grain (51.43%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2239–2442 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year conditions explained 51.4% of thousand-grain mass variation.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
mass of 1000 grainse0
Value
51.4%e0
Setting
conditions of the yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant influence of the conditions of the year on the indicators of the technological quality of grain was established: on the nature of the grain (56.8%), the total glassiness of the grain (51.43%), the mass of 1000 grains (51.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2239–2475 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year conditions explained 52.37% of gluten deformation index variation.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
gluten deformation indexe0
Value
52.37%e0
Setting
conditions of the yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant influence of the conditions of the year on the indicators of the technological quality of grain was established: on the nature of the grain (56.8%), the total glassiness of the grain (51.43%), the mass of 1000 grains (51.4%) and the gluten deformation index (52.37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2239–2517 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year conditions explained 22.0% of grain-evenness variation.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
evenness of the graine0
Value
22.0%e0
Setting
environmental conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“environmental conditions influenced the evenness of the grain (22.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2539–2608 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year conditions explained 21.66% of gluten mass-fraction variation.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
mass fraction of gluten in the graine0
Value
21.66%e0
Setting
environmental conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“environmental conditions influenced the evenness of the grain (22.0%) and the mass fraction of gluten in the grain (21.66%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2539–2662 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide contribution to grain evenness was 7.69%.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicidee0
Outcome
grain evennesse0
Value
7.69%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contribution of the fungicide to the formation of indicators of the technological quality of grain varied from 7.69% (grain evenness) to 32.43% (gluten content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2686–2846 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide contribution to gluten content was 32.43%.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicidee0
Outcome
gluten contente0
Value
32.43%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contribution of the fungicide to the formation of indicators of the technological quality of grain varied from 7.69% (grain evenness) to 32.43% (gluten content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2686–2846 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain nature was explained 14.99% by fungicide and 10.61% by genotype.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicidal treatmente0
Outcome
grain naturee0
Value
14.99%e0
Qualifier
10.61%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain nature by 14.99% was determined by the fungicidal treatment of crops and only by 10.61% depended on the genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2848–2970 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 · show in text ↑

fungicide · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

23 papers: 13 positive, 10 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.