Abstract
A two-years study was carried out at Sids Agricultural Research Station, Beni-Sweif government, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt, during 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons to evaluate response of Egyptian cotton traits to different intercropping systems with some wheat cultivars and its relationship with land usage ,farmer's benefit and insect infestation. The treatments were the combination between three wheat cultivars (Sids 4, Sids 12 and Misr 2) and three intercropping systems (wheat/cotton ‘CS1’, wheat + onion (green)/cotton ‘CS2’ and wheat + onion(green) /cotton + sesame ‘CS3’). The treatments were compared in a split plot design with three replications. The results showed that Wheat cultivar Misr 2 gave higher plant , biological and grain yields(10.41, 7.09, 19.71and 18.09) per fad but it had lower grains weight per spike than others in both seasons. Wheat cultivar Sids 4 had higher spike length and weight, grains weight per spike and 1000-grain weight. The cropping system 'CS1' had higher grain yield per fad ( 18.89 and 17.44 ardab ) than the other cropping systems in both seasons. The interaction between wheat cultivars and cropping systems significantly affected for all the studied wheat traits in both seasons. Wheat cultivar Misr 2 in cropping system CS1 recorded the highest grain yield (20.50 and 18.31) ardab per fad in both seasons. Meanwhile, the highest spike length and grains weight were obtained by growing wheat cultivar Sids 4 in cropping systems CS2, respectively, in the first season and with wheat cultivar Sids 12 in the second season. Relay intercropping cotton with wheat cultivar Sids 4 had higher seed cotton yield (8.80, 6.86 kintar) per fad than the other cultivars in both seasons. Cropping system CS1 had higher seed cotton yield ( 9.20, 7.14 kintar) per fad than other cropping systems in both seasons. The interaction between wheat cultivars and cropping systems significantly affected for all the studied cotton traits in both seasons hears rely intercropping cotton with wheat cultivar Sids 4 in intercropping CS1 give the highest values for all the studied cotton traits in both seasons. The intercropping had a significant effect on insects, larvae and whole insects. The intercropping resulted in a significant decrease in the number of insects in each of the Jassed, Aphin and the Nezara Viridula in all intercropping systems. Conversely, the intercropping cotton with wheat increased the number of red spider insects, thrips and white flies. In comparison, the intercropping resulted in a significant increase in the number of natural enemies in all intercropping systems in both seasons. while intercropping sesame with cotton also had a significant effect on insects in general, in contrast, this intercropping system had a significant effect on the incidence of almonds worms, where there was a significant decrease compared to single cotton in both seasons. on the above, intensive cropping system (Onion + wheat cultivar Sids 4/cotton + sesame) reduced insect incidence compared to the conventional cropping system (wheat/cotton). Relay intercropping cotton with wheat cultivar Sids 4 and intercropping sesame with cotton after wheat harvest (CS3) had the highest LER ( 2.81 and 2.64) , ATER(1.30 and 1.21) and MAI (LE 23985 and 21194) for the cropping system (Onion + wheat cultivar Sids 4/cotton + sesame)in the first and second seasons, respectively was higher values compared the other treatments in both seasons.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Misr 2 had higher wheat yields but lower grains weight per spike than other cultivars.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Material
- Misr 2e0
- Outcome
- plant , biological and grain yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 10.41, 7.09, 19.71and 18.09e0
- Comparator
- otherse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat cultivar Misr 2 gave higher plant , biological and grain yields(10.41, 7.09, 19.71and 18.09) per fad but it had lower grains weight per spike than others in both seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Misr 2 had lower grains weight per spike.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Misr 2t1
- Outcome
- grains weight per spikee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- otherse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it had lower grains weight per spike than others in both seasons.”
t0“some wheat cultivars”
t1“Wheat cultivar Misr 2 gave higher”
Claim · model-written summary
Sids 4 had higher spike length and weight, grains weight per spike and 1000-grain weight.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Sids 4e0
- Outcome
- spike length and weight, grains weight per spike and 1000-grain weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat cultivar Sids 4 had higher spike length and weight, grains weight per spike and 1000-grain weight.”
Claim · model-written summary
CS1 had higher wheat grain yield per fad in both seasons.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- CS1e0
- Outcome
- grain yield per fade0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 18.89 and 17.44 ardabe0
- Comparator
- other cropping systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The cropping system 'CS1' had higher grain yield per fad ( 18.89 and 17.44 ardab ) than the other cropping systems in both seasons.”
t0“some wheat cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat cultivar and cropping system interacted significantly for all wheat traits.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- wheat cultivarse0
- Treatment
- cropping systemse0
- Outcome
- all the studied wheat traitse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between wheat cultivars and cropping systems significantly affected for all the studied wheat traits in both seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Misr 2 in CS1 had the highest wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Misr 2e0
- Treatment
- CS1e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 20.50 and 18.31) ardab per fade0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat cultivar Misr 2 in cropping system CS1 recorded the highest grain yield (20.50 and 18.31) ardab per fad in both seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sids 4 with CS2 had the highest spike length and grains weight in the first season.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Sids 4e0
- Treatment
- CS2e0
- Outcome
- spike length and grains weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Setting
- first seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest spike length and grains weight were obtained by growing wheat cultivar Sids 4 in cropping systems CS2, respectively, in the first season”
Claim · model-written summary
Sids 12 had the highest stated wheat spike measures in the second season.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Sids 12e0
- Outcome
- spike length and grains weightt0
- Direction
- highestt0
- Setting
- second seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with wheat cultivar Sids 12 in the second season.”
t0“the highest spike length and grains weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Relay cotton with Sids 4 wheat had higher seed cotton yield.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume0 - Treatment
- Relay intercropping cotton with wheat cultivar Sids 4e0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 8.80, 6.86 kintare0
- Comparator
- other cultivarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Relay intercropping cotton with wheat cultivar Sids 4 had higher seed cotton yield (8.80, 6.86 kintar) per fad than the other cultivars in both seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
CS1 had higher seed cotton yield.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- CS1e0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 9.20, 7.14 kintare0
- Comparator
- other cropping systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cropping system CS1 had higher seed cotton yield ( 9.20, 7.14 kintar) per fad than other cropping systems in both seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat cultivar and cropping system significantly affected all studied cotton traits.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Material
- wheat cultivarse0
- Treatment
- cropping systemse0
- Outcome
- all the studied cotton traitse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The interaction between wheat cultivars and cropping systems significantly affected for all the studied cotton traits in both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Cotton with Sids 4 in CS1 had the highest cotton trait values.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- intercropping cotton with wheat cultivar Sids 4 in intercropping CS1e0
- Outcome
- all the studied cotton traitse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intercropping cotton with wheat cultivar Sids 4 in intercropping CS1 give the highest values for all the studied cotton traits in both seasons.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping cotton with wheat increased red spider, thrips and white flies.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- intercropping cotton with wheate0
- Interactor
- red spider insects, thrips and white fliese0pest
- Outcome
- number of red spider insects, thrips and white fliese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the intercropping cotton with wheat increased the number of red spider insects, thrips and white flies.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intensive CS3 reduced insect incidence compared with conventional wheat/cotton.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- Onion + wheat cultivar Sids 4/cotton + sesamee0
- Interactor
- insecte0pest
- Outcome
- insect incidencee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- wheat/cottone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intensive cropping system (Onion + wheat cultivar Sids 4/cotton + sesame) reduced insect incidence compared to the conventional cropping system (wheat/cotton).”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
Triticum aestivum · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
Allium cepa · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Sesamum indicum · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
intercropping · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.