Paper · 2021 · Plant Pathology

Elucidation of factors contributing to onset of Cercospora leaf blight during later reproductive development of soybean

Marija Zivanovic; Brian Ward; Paul P. Price; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract In Louisiana, Cercospora leaf blight (CLB) of soybean is primarily caused by Cercospora cf. flagellaris , which can be detected in asymptomatic leaves as early as V3 (third trifoliate) growth stage, while symptoms appear around R5 (beginning seed). The fungus produces cercosporin, an important virulence factor, the in vitro production of which is significantly reduced in the absence of simple sugars. Our objective was to investigate the role of foliar simple sugars and endophytic bacteria in CLB symptom onset. C . cf. flagellaris was cultured in filter‐sterilized, untreated extracts made from asymptomatic R2 and R5 leaves; in extracts treated with chloroform to isolate hydrophilic molecules, including simple sugars; or with antibiotics to assess the role of endophytic bacteria. Endophytic bacteria were also isolated from leaves and leaf extracts and their interaction with C . cf. flagellaris was investigated. The fungus produced more cercosporin in total R5 and simple sugar‐amended R2 leaf extracts, than in R2 leaf extracts. Furthermore, it produced more cercosporin in chloroform‐treated R5 leaf extracts, which contained significantly higher levels of simple sugars, especially fructose, than the R2. To our knowledge, this is the first reported connection between foliar sugar content and cercosporin production. Additionally, morphologically diverse bacteria were isolated from different stages of soybean development. Also, bacterial endophytes in R5 leaf extracts and Paenibacillus polymyxa , isolated from R2 leaves, significantly reduced the growth of C . cf. flagellaris . These findings implicated soybean leaf fructose in CLB development and highlighted the potential of using foliar bacterial endophytes for CLB management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cercospora cf. flagellaris was detectable in asymptomatic soybean leaves from V3, while symptoms appeared near R5.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Interactor
Cercospora cf. flagellarisCercospora cf. flagellarise0pathogen
Outcome
detected in asymptomatic leaves as early as V3 (third trifoliate) growth stage, while symptoms appear around R5 (beginning seed)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cercospora cf. flagellaris
Cercospora cf. flagellaris · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cercospora cf. flagellaris , which can be detected in asymptomatic leaves as early as V3 (third trifoliate) growth stage, while symptoms appear around R5 (beginning seed)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–256 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungus produced more cercosporin in R5 than R2 soybean leaf extracts.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
R5e0
Outcome
fungus produced more cercosporine0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
R2 leaf extractse0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungus produced more cercosporin in total R5 and simple sugar‐amended R2 leaf extracts, than in R2 leaf extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungus produced more cercosporin in sugar-amended R2 than R2 soybean leaf extracts.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
simple sugar‐amended R2 leaf extractse0
Outcome
fungus produced more cercosporine0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
R2 leaf extractse0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungus produced more cercosporin in total R5 and simple sugar‐amended R2 leaf extracts, than in R2 leaf extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloroform-treated R5 soybean extracts yielded more fungal cercosporin than R2 extracts.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
R5 leaf extractse0
Outcome
produced more cercosporine0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the R2e0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it produced more cercosporin in chloroform‐treated R5 leaf extracts, which contained significantly higher levels of simple sugars, especially fructose, than the R2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R5 soybean leaf extracts contained significantly higher simple sugar levels, especially fructose, than R2.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
R5 leaf extractse0
Outcome
levels of simple sugars, especially fructosee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the R2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chloroform‐treated R5 leaf extracts, which contained significantly higher levels of simple sugars, especially fructose, than the R2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphologically diverse bacteria were isolated at different soybean developmental stages.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
morphologically diverse bacteria were isolatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“morphologically diverse bacteria were isolated from different stages of soybean development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial endophytes from R5 soybean leaf extracts significantly reduced Cercospora growth.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
bacterial endophytes in R5 leaf extractse0
Interactor
C . cf. flagellarise0pathogen
Second interactor
bacterial endophytese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of C . cf. flagellarise0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial endophytes in R5 leaf extracts and Paenibacillus polymyxa , isolated from R2 leaves, significantly reduced the growth of C . cf. flagellaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1604 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paenibacillus polymyxa from R2 soybean leaves significantly reduced Cercospora growth.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Paenibacillus polymyxae0
Interactor
C . cf. flagellarise0pathogen
Second interactor
Paenibacillus polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of C . cf. flagellarise0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · Second interactorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paenibacillus polymyxa , isolated from R2 leaves, significantly reduced the growth of C . cf. flagellaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1604 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–119 · show in text ↑

Paenibacillus polymyxa · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 79 positive, 36 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

inoculation · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

358 papers: 323 positive, 35 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

354 papers more in this group

See all 358 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.