Paper · 2021 · Plants

Deep-Sea Actinobacteria Mitigate Salinity Stress in Tomato Seedlings and Their Biosafety Testing

Pharada Rangseekaew; Adoración Barros-Rodríguez; Wasu Pathom-aree; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil salinity is an enormous problem affecting global agricultural productivity. Deep-sea actinobacteria are interesting due to their salt tolerance mechanisms. In the present study, we aim to determine the ability of deep-sea Dermacoccus (D. barathri MT2.1T and D. profundi MT2.2T) to promote tomato seedlings under 150 mM NaCl compared with the terrestrial strain D. nishinomiyaensis DSM20448T. All strains exhibit in vitro plant growth-promoting traits of indole-3-acetic acid production, phosphate solubilization, and siderophore production. Tomato seedlings inoculated with D. barathri MT2.1T showed higher growth parameters (shoot and root length, dry weight, and chlorophyll content) than non-inoculated tomato and the terrestrial strain under 150 mM NaCl. In addition, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in leaves of tomatoes inoculated with deep-sea Dermacoccus was lower than the control seedlings. This observation suggested that deep-sea Dermacoccus mitigated salt stress by reducing oxidative stress caused by hydrogen peroxide. D. barathri MT2.1T showed no harmful effects on Caenorhabditis elegans, Daphnia magna, Eisenia foetida, and Escherichia coli MC4100 in biosafety tests. This evidence suggests that D. barathri MT2.1T would be safe for use in the environment. Our results highlight the potential of deep-sea Dermacoccus as a plant growth promoter for tomatoes under salinity stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested Dermacoccus strains showed in vitro plant growth-promoting traits: indole-3-acetic acid production, phosphate solubilization and siderophore production.

Outcome
indole-3-acetic acid production, phosphate solubilization, and siderophore productione0
Qualifier
in vitroe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“All strains exhibit in vitro plant growth-promoting traits of indole-3-acetic acid production, phosphate solubilization, and siderophore production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato seedlings inoculated with D. barathri MT2.1T had higher shoot and root length and dry weight than non-inoculated tomato and the terrestrial strain under 150 mM NaCl.

Treatment
inoculated with D. barathri MT2.1Te0
Interactor
D. barathri MT2.1TDermacoccus barathrie0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root length, dry weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under 150 mM NaCle0
Comparator
non-inoculated tomato and the terrestrial straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato seedlings inoculated with D. barathri MT2.1T showed higher growth parameters (shoot and root length, dry weight, and chlorophyll content) than non-inoculated tomato and the terrestrial strain under 150 mM NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato seedlings inoculated with D. barathri MT2.1T had higher chlorophyll content than non-inoculated tomato and the terrestrial strain under 150 mM NaCl.

Treatment
inoculated with D. barathri MT2.1Te0
Interactor
D. barathri MT2.1TDermacoccus barathrie0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under 150 mM NaCle0
Comparator
non-inoculated tomato and the terrestrial straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato seedlings inoculated with D. barathri MT2.1T showed higher growth parameters (shoot and root length, dry weight, and chlorophyll content) than non-inoculated tomato and the terrestrial strain under 150 mM NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf hydrogen peroxide was lower in tomatoes inoculated with deep-sea Dermacoccus than in control seedlings.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
inoculated with deep-sea Dermacoccuse0
Interactor
deep-sea Dermacoccuse0symbiont
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in leaves of tomatoes inoculated with deep-sea Dermacoccus was lower than the control seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. barathri MT2.1T showed no harmful effects on Caenorhabditis elegans, Daphnia magna, Eisenia foetida or Escherichia coli MC4100 in biosafety tests.

Taxon
Caenorhabditis elegans, Daphnia magna, Eisenia foetida, and Escherichia coli MC4100Escherichia coliCaenorhabditis elegansEisenia fetidaDaphnia magnae0
Treatment
D. barathri MT2.1Te0
Outcome
no harmful effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli · TaxonNIAID · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Caenorhabditis elegans
Caenorhabditis elegans · TaxonThe original uploader was Kbradnam at English Wikipedia . ( Original text: Zeynep F. Altun, Editor of www.wormatlas.org ) · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eisenia fetida
Eisenia fetida · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHolger Casselmann · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Daphnia magna
Daphnia magna · TaxonHajime Watanabe · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“D. barathri MT2.1T showed no harmful effects on Caenorhabditis elegans, Daphnia magna, Eisenia foetida, and Escherichia coli MC4100 in biosafety tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1182 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 58 positive, 15 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.