Abstract
A two year field experiment was conducted at Research farm of Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during kharif 2016 and kharif 2017. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with seven maize (Zea mays L.) based crop sequences, viz. maize-wheat, maize-potato-mentha + onion, maize + cowpea (f)- potato-mentha + onion, maize + cowpea (f)-potato-spring maize, maize + cowpea (f)-gobhi sarson-summer moong, maize-toria + gobhi sarson-summer moong and maize + cowpea (f)-toria + gobhi sarson-summer moong in main plots and four irrigation schedules of 0.75 IW/CPE, 1.0 IW/CPE, 1.25 IW/CPE and recommended schedule in sub plots replicated thrice. Intercropping of cowpea with maize increased the grain yield, crop and water productivity, energy output and net returns of kharif maize. The maximum grain yield of maize was recorded under recommended schedule which was statistically at par with 1.25 IW/CPE irrigation regime. Irrigation regime of 1.0 IW/CPE recorded the highest apparent water productivity with 3.00 and 3.07 kg/m3 during 2016 and 2017, respectively. Irrigation regimes of I1.25 and IRec were the most energy efficient and energy productive.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping increased maize grain yield, crop and water productivity.
- Treatment
- Intercropping of cowpea with maizee0
- Interactor
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0other - Outcome
- grain yield, crop and water productivitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping of cowpea with maize increased the grain yield, crop and water productivity, energy output and net returns of kharif maize.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping increased maize energy output and net returns.
- Treatment
- Intercropping of cowpea with maizee0
- Interactor
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0other
- Outcome
- energy output and net returnse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping of cowpea with maize increased the grain yield, crop and water productivity, energy output and net returns of kharif maize.”
Claim · model-written summary
Recommended irrigation had maximum maize grain yield and was statistically at par with 1.25 IW/CPE.
- Treatment
- recommended schedulee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- 1.25 IW/CPE irrigation regimee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum grain yield of maize was recorded under recommended schedule which was statistically at par with 1.25 IW/CPE irrigation regime.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1.0 IW/CPE regime gave the highest apparent water productivity, 3.00 kg/m3 in 2016.
- Treatment
- 1.0 IW/CPEe0
- Outcome
- apparent water productivitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 3.00e0
- Qualifier
- 2016e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation regime of 1.0 IW/CPE recorded the highest apparent water productivity with 3.00 and 3.07 kg/m3 during 2016 and 2017, respectively.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The 1.0 IW/CPE regime gave the highest apparent water productivity, 3.07 kg/m3 in 2017.
- Treatment
- 1.0 IW/CPEe0
- Outcome
- apparent water productivitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 3.07 kg/m3e0
- Qualifier
- 2017e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation regime of 1.0 IW/CPE recorded the highest apparent water productivity with 3.00 and 3.07 kg/m3 during 2016 and 2017, respectively.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
I1.25 and IRec were the most energy efficient and productive irrigation regimes.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation regimes of I1.25 and IRec were the most energy efficient and energy productive.”
t0“maize”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna unguiculata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
123 papers more in this group
See all 127 papers →Vigna unguiculata · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
intercropping · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
830 papers more in this group
See all 834 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.