Paper · 2021 · Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems

Validation of integrated pest management (IPM) module against sucking pest complex of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)

P. Viswanadha Raghuteja; N. Emmanuel

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Studies on the impact of IPM and non-IPM practices were carried out during rabi season 2018–19 at College of Horticulture, Venkataramannagudem, West Godavari district, Andhra Pradesh with an objective of examining their influence on pest complex and determining pesticide residues. The results revealed that the mean population of jassids (Amrasca devastans devastans) was 2.82 number per okra leaf in IPM plot, whereas in the non-IPM and control plots it was 5.43 and 8.46 number per leaf. Similarly, the maximum mean population of whitefly (Bemesia tabaci) was recorded in okra grown in control plot with 4.54 number per leaf followed by non-IPM plot with 1.17 number per leaf and 0.42 number per okra leaf in IPM plot of okra. The minimum average population of aphids was observed in okra grown in IPM plot with 0.27 number per leaf followed by non-IPM plot with 1.11 number per leaf, whereas in control plot it was 2.79 number per leaf. The average population of two spotted mites per sq.cm leaf area was 0.54 number in IPM plot, whereas it was 1.03 and 4.04 number per sq.cm leaf area in non-IPM and control plots of okra respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM plots had 2.82 jassids per leaf versus 5.43 in non-IPM and 8.46 in control plots.

Treatment
IPM plote0
Interactor
Amrasca devastans devastanse0pest
Outcome
population of jassidse0
Value
2.82 number per okra leafe0
Comparator
non-IPM and control plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean population of jassids (Amrasca devastans devastans) was 2.82 number per okra leaf in IPM plot, whereas in the non-IPM and control plots it was 5.43 and 8.46 number per leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–489 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM plots had 0.42 whiteflies per okra leaf versus 1.17 in non-IPM and 4.54 in control plots.

Treatment
IPM plote0
Interactor
Bemesia tabacie0pest
Outcome
population of whiteflye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.42 number per okra leafe0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum mean population of whitefly (Bemesia tabaci) was recorded in okra grown in control plot with 4.54 number per leaf followed by non-IPM plot with 1.17 number per leaf and 0.42 number per okra leaf in IPM plot of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM plots had the minimum aphid population, 0.27 per leaf, versus 1.11 and 2.79.

Treatment
IPM plote0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
population of aphidse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.27 number per leafe0
Comparator
non-IPM plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum average population of aphids was observed in okra grown in IPM plot with 0.27 number per leaf followed by non-IPM plot with 1.11 number per leaf, whereas in control plot it was 2.79 number per leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM plots had 0.54 two spotted mites per square centimeter versus 1.03 and 4.04.

Treatment
IPM plote0
Interactor
two spotted mitesTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
population of two spotted mitese0
Value
0.54 numbere0
Comparator
non-IPM and control plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“population of two spotted mites per sq.cm leaf area was 0.54 number in IPM plot, whereas it was 1.03 and 4.04 number per sq.cm leaf area in non-IPM and control plots of okra respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–118 · show in text ↑

ipm · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

ipm · Aphidomorpha · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ipm · Tetranychus urticae · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.