Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at the Agricultural Research and Experiments (station A), which belong to the college of Agricultural Engineering Sciences/University of Baghdad with a silty loam soil by using Randomized Block Design with three replicates to evaluate the effect of using a combination of bacterial biofertilizer consist of Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus mucilagenosus and Rhizobium phaseoli with two levels of vermicompost (0 and 10 mcgh-1) on plant growth parameters of Green Beans and its yield and availability of N,P and K in soil under two levels of mineral fertilization (0% and 50%) of fertilizer recommendation in addition to using the full fertilizer recommendation treatment(100%) as a second control treatment. The results showed the significant superiority of the bacterial combination biofertilizer with (10 mcgh-1 ) vermicompost and 50% of mineral fertilizer compared with the treatment of full fertilizer recommendation in most of the growth and yield parameters of green beans, as the number of pods, nodules number and total yield were 150.00 plant pod-1 ,8.33 plant node-1and 71.48 mcg h-1respectively,whereas the soil content of a available NPK was 85.00,14.00 and 198.00 mcgh-1 in the same treatment above respectively in compare with the control(without any addition) treatment which its availability of NPK was (29.00,4.07 ,89.00)mgkg-1respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial biofertilizer with vermicompost and 50% mineral fertilizer was significantly superior to the full fertilizer recommendation for most growth and yield parameters of green beans.

Taxon
green beanse1
Treatment
bacterial combination biofertilizere1
Interactor
Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0symbiont
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse1
Direction
superioritye1
Comparator
treatment of full fertilizer recommendatione1

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF THE COMBINATION OF BACTERIAL BIOFERTILIZER AND VERMICOMPOST IN THE AVAILABILITY OF N, P, K AND SOME OF PLANT PARAMETERS OF BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e0

“bacterial biofertilizer consist of Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus mucilagenosus and Rhizobium phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed the significant superiority of the bacterial combination biofertilizer with (10 mcgh-1 ) vermicompost and 50% of mineral fertilizer compared with the treatment of full fertilizer recommendation in most of the growth and yield parameters of green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–1011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of pods per plant was 150.00 under the bacterial combination biofertilizer treatment.

Taxon
green beanse1
Treatment
bacterial combination biofertilizere1
Interactor
Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0symbiont
Outcome
number of podse2
Direction
superioritye1
Value
150.00e2
Comparator
treatment of full fertilizer recommendatione1

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF THE COMBINATION OF BACTERIAL BIOFERTILIZER AND VERMICOMPOST IN THE AVAILABILITY OF N, P, K AND SOME OF PLANT PARAMETERS OF BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e0

“bacterial biofertilizer consist of Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus mucilagenosus and Rhizobium phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed the significant superiority of the bacterial combination biofertilizer with (10 mcgh-1 ) vermicompost and 50% of mineral fertilizer compared with the treatment of full fertilizer recommendation in most of the growth and yield parameters of green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–1011 · show in text ↑
e2

“as the number of pods, nodules number and total yield were 150.00 plant pod-1 ,8.33 plant node-1and 71.48 mcg h-1respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodules number per plant was 8.33 under the bacterial combination biofertilizer treatment.

Taxon
green beanse1
Treatment
bacterial combination biofertilizere1
Interactor
Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0symbiont
Outcome
nodules numbere2
Direction
superioritye1
Value
8.33e2
Comparator
treatment of full fertilizer recommendatione1

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF THE COMBINATION OF BACTERIAL BIOFERTILIZER AND VERMICOMPOST IN THE AVAILABILITY OF N, P, K AND SOME OF PLANT PARAMETERS OF BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e0

“bacterial biofertilizer consist of Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus mucilagenosus and Rhizobium phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed the significant superiority of the bacterial combination biofertilizer with (10 mcgh-1 ) vermicompost and 50% of mineral fertilizer compared with the treatment of full fertilizer recommendation in most of the growth and yield parameters of green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–1011 · show in text ↑
e2

“as the number of pods, nodules number and total yield were 150.00 plant pod-1 ,8.33 plant node-1and 71.48 mcg h-1respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield of green beans was 71.48 under the bacterial combination biofertilizer treatment.

Taxon
green beanse1
Treatment
bacterial combination biofertilizere1
Interactor
Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0symbiont
Outcome
total yielde2
Direction
superioritye1
Value
71.48e2
Comparator
treatment of full fertilizer recommendatione1

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF THE COMBINATION OF BACTERIAL BIOFERTILIZER AND VERMICOMPOST IN THE AVAILABILITY OF N, P, K AND SOME OF PLANT PARAMETERS OF BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e0

“bacterial biofertilizer consist of Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus mucilagenosus and Rhizobium phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed the significant superiority of the bacterial combination biofertilizer with (10 mcgh-1 ) vermicompost and 50% of mineral fertilizer compared with the treatment of full fertilizer recommendation in most of the growth and yield parameters of green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–1011 · show in text ↑
e2

“as the number of pods, nodules number and total yield were 150.00 plant pod-1 ,8.33 plant node-1and 71.48 mcg h-1respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available N under bacterial biofertilizer with vermicompost was higher than in the control without any addition.

Taxon
green beanse1
Treatment
bacterial combination biofertilizere1
Interactor
Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0symbiont
Outcome
soil content of a available NPKe3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
85.00e3
Comparator
control(without any addition) treatmente3

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF THE COMBINATION OF BACTERIAL BIOFERTILIZER AND VERMICOMPOST IN THE AVAILABILITY OF N, P, K AND SOME OF PLANT PARAMETERS OF BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e0

“bacterial biofertilizer consist of Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus mucilagenosus and Rhizobium phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed the significant superiority of the bacterial combination biofertilizer with (10 mcgh-1 ) vermicompost and 50% of mineral fertilizer compared with the treatment of full fertilizer recommendation in most of the growth and yield parameters of green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–1011 · show in text ↑
e3

“whereas the soil content of a available NPK was 85.00,14.00 and 198.00 mcgh-1 in the same treatment above respectively in compare with the control(without any addition) treatment which its availability of NPK was (29.00,4.07 ,89.00)mgkg-1respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available P under bacterial biofertilizer with vermicompost was higher than in the control without any addition.

Taxon
green beanse1
Treatment
bacterial combination biofertilizere1
Interactor
Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0symbiont
Outcome
soil content of a available NPKe3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
14.00e3
Comparator
control(without any addition) treatmente3

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF THE COMBINATION OF BACTERIAL BIOFERTILIZER AND VERMICOMPOST IN THE AVAILABILITY OF N, P, K AND SOME OF PLANT PARAMETERS OF BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e0

“bacterial biofertilizer consist of Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus mucilagenosus and Rhizobium phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed the significant superiority of the bacterial combination biofertilizer with (10 mcgh-1 ) vermicompost and 50% of mineral fertilizer compared with the treatment of full fertilizer recommendation in most of the growth and yield parameters of green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–1011 · show in text ↑
e3

“whereas the soil content of a available NPK was 85.00,14.00 and 198.00 mcgh-1 in the same treatment above respectively in compare with the control(without any addition) treatment which its availability of NPK was (29.00,4.07 ,89.00)mgkg-1respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available K under bacterial biofertilizer with vermicompost was higher than in the control without any addition.

Taxon
green beanse1
Treatment
bacterial combination biofertilizere1
Interactor
Rhizobium phaseoliRhizobium phaseolie0symbiont
Outcome
soil content of a available NPKe3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
198.00e3
Comparator
control(without any addition) treatmente3

Verbatim

t0

“EVALUATION OF THE COMBINATION OF BACTERIAL BIOFERTILIZER AND VERMICOMPOST IN THE AVAILABILITY OF N, P, K AND SOME OF PLANT PARAMETERS OF BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e0

“bacterial biofertilizer consist of Bacillus megaterium , Bacillus mucilagenosus and Rhizobium phaseoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed the significant superiority of the bacterial combination biofertilizer with (10 mcgh-1 ) vermicompost and 50% of mineral fertilizer compared with the treatment of full fertilizer recommendation in most of the growth and yield parameters of green beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–1011 · show in text ↑
e3

“whereas the soil content of a available NPK was 85.00,14.00 and 198.00 mcgh-1 in the same treatment above respectively in compare with the control(without any addition) treatment which its availability of NPK was (29.00,4.07 ,89.00)mgkg-1respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1389 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizobium phaseoli · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.