Paper · 2021 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Response to Application and Tissue Diagnosis of Boron Deficiency and Toxicity in Maize

Lenir Fátima Gotz; F. Silvestrin; A. C. V. Motta; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiments were conducted to verify the effect of doses and application time of boron (B) in the grain yield of maize and to study different plant tissues as a nutritional diagnosis tool for B. Six doses of B (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 12 kg ha−1) and two application times (before at sowing and V6 growth stage) were tested. In the first growing season, the B doses and application time did not influence yield components of maize. While the second growing season, B application reached maximum grain yield with 5.0 kg ha−1 at sowing, but at a high dose provided toxicity causing injuries in the cobs. In general, the B content in the leaf at flowering stage was higher with the application at V6 growth stage. B content and distribution in the leaves close to the cob vary with the rainfall that occurs before to the collection, harming the definition of the critical leaf level. The B content in the silk can be a reliable alternative for checking the deficiency or toxicity of this nutrient in the plant, presenting critical level for deficiency (calculated) of 23.2 mg kg−1 while values above 31.5 mg kg−1 can be considered toxic.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron dose and timing did not influence maize yield components in the first growing season.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
B doses and application timee0
Outcome
yield componentse0
Direction
did not influencee0
Qualifier
first growing seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first growing season, the B doses and application time did not influence yield components of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At sowing, a boron dose of 5.0 kg ha−1 gave the maximum maize grain yield in the second growing season.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
B applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.0 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
second growing seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the second growing season, B application reached maximum grain yield with 5.0 kg ha−1 at sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A high boron dose caused toxicity injuries in maize cobs in the second season.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
cobse0
Treatment
a high dosee0
Outcome
injuries in the cobse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the second growing season, B application reached maximum grain yield with 5.0 kg ha−1 at sowing, but at a high dose provided toxicity causing injuries in the cobs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying boron at V6 generally increased leaf boron content at flowering.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
application at V6 growth stagee0
Outcome
B content in the leafe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In general, the B content in the leaf at flowering stage was higher with the application at V6 growth stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall before sampling changed boron content and distribution in leaves near the cob, impairing definition of a critical leaf level.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
rainfall that occurs before to the collectione0
Outcome
B content and distribution in the leaves close to the cobe0
Direction
varye0
Qualifier
harming the definition of the critical leaf levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B content and distribution in the leaves close to the cob vary with the rainfall that occurs before to the collection, harming the definition of the critical leaf level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silk boron content was proposed as a diagnostic for maize boron deficiency, with a calculated critical level of 23.2 mg kg−1.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
silke0
Outcome
deficiencye0
Value
23.2 mg kg−1e0
Qualifier
calculatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The B content in the silk can be a reliable alternative for checking the deficiency or toxicity of this nutrient in the plant, presenting critical level for deficiency (calculated) of 23.2 mg kg−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silk boron content above 31.5 mg kg−1 was considered toxic for maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
silke1
Outcome
toxice0
Value
31.5 mg kg−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“values above 31.5 mg kg−1 can be considered toxic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“The B content in the silk can be a reliable alternative for checking the deficiency or toxicity of this nutrient in the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1004 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

83 papers: 72 positive, 11 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

stage · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.