Abstract
Traditional post-harvest operation methods applied in rice fields lack advanced management knowledge and technology, which has led to post-harvest losses. We proposed the concept of Five Time (5T) management for the first time. 5T management divides the whole life cycle of rice into different growth time interval to complete process management. This paper mainly introduces the management of rice grain period, that is, the post-harvest management period, including the operation process management of harvesting, field stacking, drying, warehousing, and storing. In 2019, our research team formulated the 5T management method, which considers the entire post-harvest process, and carried out a pilot application of this method at the Jilin Rice Industry Alliance of Jilin Province. Moreover, to promote the 5T management method, our research team carried out follow-up experiments in rice production enterprises and found severe post-harvest rice losses. This paper combined a large number of literature and the basic theory research of rice post-harvest to analyze the traditional methods for post-harvest processing and the associated rice losses. By implementing the 5T management method, 4.33% of losses incurred during the T1 harvesting period could be recovered. In the T2 field period, drying rice within 48 h after harvesting could reduce losses by 2.5%. In the T3 drying period, the loss rate could be reduced by 1.6% if traditional drying methods were replaced by mechanical drying and by 0.6% if cyclic drying was implemented to prevent over-drying. In the T5 storage period, the loss rate of 7% could be reduced by adopting advanced grain storage technologies such as low-temperature storage. Overall, the rice loss rate could be reduced by 15.43%, which is equivalent to a yield of 32.68 million tonnes of rice. The important factors in each period are strictly controlled in the 5T management method to prevent the post-harvest losses caused by flawed concepts and improper management and to increase the amount of usable fertile land.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
5T management could recover 4.33% of harvesting-period losses.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- 5T management methode0
- Outcome
- losses incurred during the T1 harvesting periode0
- Direction
- recoverede0
- Value
- 4.33%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By implementing the 5T management method, 4.33% of losses incurred during the T1 harvesting period could be recovered”
t0“Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Drying within 48 hours after harvest could reduce field-period losses by 2.5%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- drying rice within 48 h after harvestinge0
- Outcome
- lossese0
- Direction
- reducee0
- Value
- 2.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the T2 field period, drying rice within 48 h after harvesting could reduce losses by 2.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Mechanical drying could reduce loss rate by 1.6% versus traditional drying.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- mechanical dryinge0
- Outcome
- loss ratee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 1.6%e0
- Comparator
- traditional drying methodse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the loss rate could be reduced by 1.6% if traditional drying methods were replaced by mechanical drying”
t0“Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Cyclic drying could reduce loss rate by 0.6%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“by 0.6% if cyclic drying was implemented to prevent over-drying”
e1“the loss rate could be reduced”
t0“Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Advanced grain storage could reduce the 7% storage-period loss rate.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- advanced grain storage technologies such as low-temperature storagee0
- Outcome
- loss ratee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the loss rate of 7% could be reduced by adopting advanced grain storage technologies such as low-temperature storage”
t0“Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The total rice loss rate could be reduced by 15.43%.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Outcome
- rice loss ratee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 15.43%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Overall, the rice loss rate could be reduced by 15.43%”
Claim · model-written summary
The estimated recovered yield was 32.68 million tonnes of rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 32.68 million tonnese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“which is equivalent to a yield of 32.68 million tonnes of rice”
The same questions in other papers
processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
110 papers more in this group
See all 114 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.