Paper · 2021 · Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi

Influence of Groundnut Waste as Substrate and Host Plant on Inoculum Production of Endophytic Mycorrhiza for Large Scale Agricultural Application

Ashish KUMAR; Ashok AGGARWAL; Navnita SHARMA; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A pot culture experiment was conducted to study the effect of soil amendment with different forms of groundnut waste on spore population and root infection of indigenous Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungal species i.e. Glomus mosseae under polyhouse conditions. Two angiospermic plant species viz. sorghum and sesame were also examined for mycorrhization potential in the study. Observations were made for percent root colonization, spore density of AM fungi and the effectiveness of AM fungi on the shoot and root biomass of both host plants. The results indicated that AM fungal spore population and colonization levels were substantially enhanced by the application of compost groundnut waste as a substrate over dry groundnut waste. Among growth parameters, plant height, root length and plant biomass were recorded more in sorghum than Sesame. On the whole, mycorrhization was reported the highest with 75 g/pot concentration of waste. Also, Sorghum appeared to be a better host than sesame.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost groundnut waste enhanced mycorrhizal spore population compared with dry waste.

Taxon
sorghum and sesameSesamum indicumSorghumt0
Treatment
compost groundnut wastee0
Interactor
AM fungale0symbiont
Outcome
AM fungal spore populatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
dry groundnut wastee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that AM fungal spore population and colonization levels were substantially enhanced by the application of compost groundnut waste as a substrate over dry groundnut waste.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum and sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost groundnut waste enhanced mycorrhizal colonization compared with dry waste.

Taxon
sorghum and sesameSesamum indicumSorghumt0
Treatment
compost groundnut wastee0
Interactor
AM fungale0symbiont
Outcome
colonization levelse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
dry groundnut wastee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that AM fungal spore population and colonization levels were substantially enhanced by the application of compost groundnut waste as a substrate over dry groundnut waste.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum and sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–310 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum had greater plant height, root length and biomass than sesame.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
plant height, root length and plant biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Sesamee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among growth parameters, plant height, root length and plant biomass were recorded more in sorghum than Sesame.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest mycorrhization was reported at 75 g/pot of waste.

Taxon
sorghum and sesameSesamum indicumSorghumt0
Treatment
75 g/pot concentration of wastee0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet1symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizatione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the whole, mycorrhization was reported the highest with 75 g/pot concentration of waste.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum and sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–310 · show in text ↑
t1

“Glomus mosseae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum appeared to be a better mycorrhizal host than sesame.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet0symbiont
Outcome
better hoste0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
sesamee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, Sorghum appeared to be a better host than sesame.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glomus mosseae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–227 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · pest · SorghumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · pest · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · disease · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · pest · SorghumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · disease · SorghumPositive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · pest · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · disease · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.