Paper · 2021 · Asian Plant Research Journal

Effect of Selected Weed Management Practices on the Growth and Yield Components of Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana) in Western Region of Kenya

Mayaka Justus Mogaka; Korir Kibet Nicholas; Wafula Wekha Nelson; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Finger millet (Elusine coracana) accounts for 8% of the total area and 11% of the millet production worldwide. It is grown on over 4 million ha globally, mainly for food purposes. Millions of people in the dry lands of Central and East Africa, and South of India depend on finger millet as an important source of food to them (CGIAR, 2001). Finger millet is one of the most neglected and underutilized crops. Additionally, the crop has received limited research attention compared to wheat, rice, and maize (FAO, 2011). Therefore, production challenges such as those caused by weeds like goose grass Elusine indica remain at large. Manual weeding is the commonly employed weed control method in finger millet production, but is expensive and labour intensive. The current study was set to evaluate the influence of weed management practices on finger millet growth and yield components. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replicates. The plots measured 2 by 2m with a border width of 1m. The treatments included Pendimethalin, Dimethyl amine, Metolachlor, Metribuzin, Atrazine (at three rates each 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 l/ha), No weeding and Hand weeding. Data was collected on the number of weed species, weed biomass, number of basal tillers, herbicide phytotoxicity, weed and crop heights, number of panicles, weight of panicles, weight of un-threshed and threshed grains and 1000 grain weight. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA using GenStat version 15.1. Application of Pendimethalin at 1.5 and 2.0 L/ha Active Ingredient (AI), resulted in weed optimal control and least phytotoxicity. Results also indicated that the height of finger millet was significantly (p<0.001) higher where the herbicides were applied. Lower weed biomass was also positively correlated with higher crop height, more panicles, high unthreshed and threshed weights and a 1000 grain weight. Application of 2,4D at rates of 1.5L and 2.0L resulted in significantly taller plants 33.00 cm, than the other weed management methods. Finger millet under Pendimethalin 1.5 L gave the highest number of 86 panicles while Atrazine 2.0L and Pendimethalin1.5L methods of weed control, had significantly higher weight compared to all the other treatments. The 1000 seed mass across the treatments averaged 2.31 g while the on the untreated treatments had an average of 1.54 g. Weed control using pre emergence herbicides significantly (p<0.001) increased the yields of finger millet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin at 1.5 and 2.0 L/ha achieved optimal weed control and least phytotoxicity.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Pendimethalin at 1.5 and 2.0 L/hae0
Outcome
weed optimal control and least phytotoxicitye0
Direction
optimale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Pendimethalin at 1.5 and 2.0 L/ha Active Ingredient (AI), resulted in weed optimal control and least phytotoxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide applications produced significantly taller finger millet.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
herbicidese0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
p<0.001e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the height of finger millet was significantly (p<0.001) higher where the herbicides were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1763 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower weed biomass correlated with greater crop height, panicle number, grain weights and 1000 grain weight.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
crop height, more panicles, high unthreshed and threshed weights and a 1000 grain weighte0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower weed biomass was also positively correlated with higher crop height, more panicles, high unthreshed and threshed weights and a 1000 grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4D at 1.5 and 2.0 L produced significantly taller plants at 33.00 cm.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
2,4D at rates of 1.5L and 2.0Le0
Outcome
taller plantse0
Direction
tallere0
Value
33.00 cme0
Comparator
other weed management methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2,4D at rates of 1.5L and 2.0L resulted in significantly taller plants 33.00 cm, than the other weed management methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1917–2051 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin at 1.5 L gave the highest panicle number, 86.

Taxon
Finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
Pendimethalin 1.5 Le0
Outcome
paniclese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
86 paniclese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Finger millet under Pendimethalin 1.5 L gave the highest number of 86 panicles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2053–2131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine 2.0 L and Pendimethalin 1.5 L produced significantly higher panicle weights than other treatments.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Atrazine 2.0L and Pendimethalin1.5Le0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Atrazine 2.0L and Pendimethalin1.5L methods of weed control, had significantly higher weight compared to all the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2138–2267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average 1000 seed mass was 2.31 g across treatments, compared with 1.54 g untreated.

Taxon
Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
1000 seed masse0
Value
2.31 ge0
Qualifier
1.54 ge0
Comparator
untreated treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1000 seed mass across the treatments averaged 2.31 g while the on the untreated treatments had an average of 1.54 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2269–2388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence herbicides significantly increased finger millet yields.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
pre emergence herbicidese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control using pre emergence herbicides significantly (p<0.001) increased the yields of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2390–2495 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

herbicide · growth · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.