Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Influence of Pre and Post Emergence Herbicides on Weed Dynamics, WCE and Yield of Pigeon Pea under Rainfed Conditions

Yusufali A. Nimbargi; Narayan S. Mavarkar; Pandit S. Rathod; et al.

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at ICAR-KVK, Kalaburgi, during Kharif seasons of 2018-19 and 2019-20 to adjudge the efficacy of pre and post emergence herbicides against diverse weed flora in pigeonpea ecosystem. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with 11 treatments comprising of different pre-emergent herbicides viz., Pendimethalin, Pendimethalin 30 EC + Imazethapyr 2 EC and post-emergence premix product herbicides such as Imazamox 35 WG + Imazethapyr 35 WG, Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75%w/w ME and their different dosages with cultural methods were compared with weed free check and weedy check treatments. Among the different pre and post emeregent herbicides tested against different weed flora, post emergent application of Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 days recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight, highest weed control efficiency (91.36%) and lowest weed index (8.78%) and higher grain yield (1209 kg ha-1 ), net returns (` 43,036 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.35) followed by Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 1500 ml ha-1 at 20-25 DAS, Imazamox 35 WG + Imazethapyr 35 WG at 100 g ha-1 at 20-25 DAS and HW at 20 and IC 40 and 60 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr at 2000 ml ha-1 lowered weed density and dry weight.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 dayse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density, weed dry weighte0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post emergent application of Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 days recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“post emergent application of Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 days recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment achieved 91.36% weed control efficiency.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 dayst1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
91.36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest weed control efficiency (91.36%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“post emergent application of Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 days recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment had the lowest weed index at 8.78%.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 dayst1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
8.78%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest weed index (8.78%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“post emergent application of Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 days recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment produced higher grain yield of 1209 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 dayst1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1209 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher grain yield (1209 kg ha-1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“post emergent application of Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 days recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment yielded net returns of 43,036 ha-1.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 dayst1
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
43,036 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns (` 43,036 ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“post emergent application of Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 days recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment yielded a benefit cost ratio of 2.35.

Taxon
Pigeon PeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 dayst1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Value
2.35e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit cost ratio (2.35)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pigeon Pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–92 · show in text ↑
t1

“post emergent application of Propaquizafop 2.5% + Imazethapyr 3.75% w/w ME @ 2000 ml ha-1 at 20-25 days recorded significantly lower weed density, weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–877 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

propaquizafop · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

propaquizafop · weed · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr at 62.5+75 g/ha markedly arrested weed biomass and was superior to single herbicides.

    To Find out the Suitable Post Emergence Herbicides for Controlling Weeds in Pigeonpea · 2018 · compared with alone application of propaquizafop (50, 62.5, 100 and 125 g/ha), fenaxaprop-p-ethyl (100 g/ha) and imazethapyr (100 g/ha)

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Propaquizafop plus imazethapyr at 62.5+75 g/ha markedly arrested weed biomass and was superior to single herbicides.

    To Find out the Suitable Post Emergence Herbicides for Controlling Weeds in Pigeonpea · 2018 · compared with alone application of propaquizafop (50, 62.5, 100 and 125 g/ha), fenaxaprop-p-ethyl (100 g/ha) and imazethapyr (100 g/ha)

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.