Abstract
Field experiments carried out at JNKVV, Jabalpur during kharif season of 2014-15 and 2015-16 to evaluate the bio-efficacy of propaquizafop + imazethapyr ready mixture against weeds and their influence on yield and economics of pigeonpea, in randomized block design with three replications, revealed that post emergence application of propaquizafop alone at lowest doses (50 and 62.5 g ha−1) led to no marked effect against most of the weeds, but its efficacy improved when applied in combination with imazethapyr, being higher under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 62.5+ 75 g ha−1 or 100+100 g ha−1. Yield of pigeonpea was superior under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 100 + 100 g ha−1 followed by 62.5 + 75 g ha−1 which were comparable to hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS. Highest benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was found under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture at 62.5+75 g ha−1 followed by propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture (100+100 g ha−1), imazethapyr (100 g ha−1), propaquizafop (125 g ha−1), propaquizafop (100 g ha−1), Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (100 g ha−1) propaquizafop (62.5 g ha– 1) and propaquizafop (50 g ha−1). Weed control efficiency (WCE), Weed index (WI), Weed management index (WMI) and Harvest index (HI) were highest under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 62.5+75 g ha−1 followed by propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 100+100 g ha−1 and hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The lowest propaquizafop doses had no marked effect against most weeds.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- propaquizafop alone at lowest doses (50 and 62.5 g ha−1)e0
- Outcome
- most of the weedse0
- Direction
- no marked effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pigeonpea”
e0“post emergence application of propaquizafop alone at lowest doses (50 and 62.5 g ha−1) led to no marked effect against most of the weeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Combining propaquizafop with imazethapyr improved weed control efficacy.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- combination with imazethapyre0
- Outcome
- efficacye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pigeonpea”
e0“its efficacy improved when applied in combination with imazethapyr, being higher under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 62.5+ 75 g ha−1 or 100+100 g ha−1”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100 + 100 g ha−1 herbicide mixture gave the superior pigeonpea yield.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 100 + 100 g ha−1e0
- Outcome
- Yield of pigeonpeae0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DASe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield of pigeonpea was superior under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 100 + 100 g ha−1 followed by 62.5 + 75 g ha−1 which were comparable to hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS”
Claim · model-written summary
The 62.5 + 75 g ha−1 mixture ranked second for pigeonpea yield and was comparable with hand weeding.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- 62.5 + 75 g ha−1e0
- Outcome
- Yield of pigeonpeae0
- Comparator
- hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DASe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield of pigeonpea was superior under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 100 + 100 g ha−1 followed by 62.5 + 75 g ha−1 which were comparable to hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS”
Claim · model-written summary
The 62.5+75 g ha−1 mixture had the highest benefit-cost ratio.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture at 62.5+75 g ha−1e0
- Outcome
- benefit-cost ratio (BCR)e0
- Direction
- Higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pigeonpea”
e0“Highest benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was found under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture at 62.5+75 g ha−1”
Claim · model-written summary
The 62.5+75 g ha−1 mixture produced the highest weed control efficiency, weed index, and weed management index.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 62.5+75 g ha−1e0
- Outcome
- Weed control efficiency (WCE), Weed index (WI), Weed management index (WMI)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pigeonpea”
e0“Weed control efficiency (WCE), Weed index (WI), Weed management index (WMI) and Harvest index (HI) were highest under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 62.5+75 g ha−1”
Claim · model-written summary
The 62.5+75 g ha−1 mixture produced the highest harvest index.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 62.5+75 g ha−1e0
- Outcome
- Harvest index (HI)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pigeonpea”
e0“Weed control efficiency (WCE), Weed index (WI), Weed management index (WMI) and Harvest index (HI) were highest under propaquizafop + imazethapyr mixture applied at 62.5+75 g ha−1”
The same questions in other papers
Imazethapyr · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →propaquizafop · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
propaquizafop · weed · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Imazethapyr · weed · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.