Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Monitoring Optical Tool to Determine the Chlorophyll Concentration in Ornamental Plants

Rafael Jiménez-Lao; Pedro Garcia-Caparros; Mónica Pérez-Saiz; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The accurate estimation of leaf photosynthetic pigments concentration is crucial to check the plant´s health. Traditional methods of measuring photosynthetic pigments involve complex procedures of solvent extraction followed by spectrophotometric determinations. Portable plant instruments such as Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) meters can facilitate this task for the speed and simplicity of the measures. The relationship between chlorophyll index obtained by SPAD-502 and pigment concentration in several ornamental species can help in the management of ornamental plant production. Two trials have been carried out in two different growing seasons (spring and summer) and facilities (greenhouse and open air), involving 30 ornamental species. There was a high linear relationship between concentrations of Chla and Chlb, as well as between Chlt and Ct in different species studied under greenhouse and open field conditions. The ratio between Chla and Chlb was higher at open field conditions and similar between Chlt and Ct. There was also a good relationship between Chlorophyll index and Chlt under both growing conditions, as well as between Chlorophyll index and Ct under greenhouse conditions. However, linear relationships with different slopes were observed for groups of species at open field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chla and Chlb concentrations had a high linear relationship.

Taxon
Ornamental Plantst0
Outcome
concentrations of Chla and Chlbe0
Setting
greenhouse and open field conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There was a high linear relationship between concentrations of Chla and Chlb, as well as between Chlt and Ct in different species studied under greenhouse and open field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ornamental Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlt and Ct concentrations had a high linear relationship.

Taxon
Ornamental Plantst0
Outcome
Chlt and Cte0
Setting
greenhouse and open field conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There was a high linear relationship between concentrations of Chla and Chlb, as well as between Chlt and Ct in different species studied under greenhouse and open field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ornamental Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Chla-to-Chlb ratio was higher in open field conditions.

Taxon
Ornamental Plantst0
Outcome
ratio between Chla and Chlbe0
Direction
highere0
Setting
open field conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio between Chla and Chlb was higher at open field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1004 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ornamental Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Chlt-to-Ct ratio was similar between conditions.

Taxon
Ornamental Plantst0
Outcome
Chlt and Cte0
Direction
similare0

Verbatim

e0

“similar between Chlt and Ct”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ornamental Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll index related well to Chlt under both growing conditions.

Taxon
Ornamental Plantst0
Outcome
relationship between Chlorophyll index and Chlte0
Comparator
Chlte0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“a good relationship between Chlorophyll index and Chlt under both growing conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ornamental Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll index related well to Ct under greenhouse conditions.

Taxon
Ornamental Plantst0
Outcome
Chlorophyll index and Cte0
Comparator
Cte0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“between Chlorophyll index and Ct under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1210 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was also a good relationship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ornamental Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species groups had different open-field slopes in the linear relationships.

Taxon
Ornamental Plantst0
Outcome
linear relationships with different slopese0
Comparator
groups of speciese0
Setting
open field conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“linear relationships with different slopes were observed for groups of species at open field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1325 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ornamental Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–87 · show in text ↑