Paper · 2021 · AIP conference proceedings

Ways to improve the technological properties of commercial grain and ensure its preservation

R. Timakova; S. Efremova; V. Zuparova

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Problems of obtaining high-quality crop products, which are a raw material for the food industry, are distinguished by technological and environmental complexity. The combination of the plants natural characteristics, the state of the soil and climatic factors plays a decisive role in obtaining high-quality grain, suitable for its further processing. Research has been carried out on low-humus contaminated soil. The influence of fertilizers on the quality indicators of plant raw materials is shown. The use of biohumus helped to improve the technological properties of spring wheat grain. The most effective dose is 6 t / ha of biohumus for increasing gluten, macronutrient content and reducing the concentration of toxic elements. The use of ionizing radiation contributed to a decrease in the microbial environment and the population of pests present in the mass of commercial grain after threshing. The efficiency of treatment with ionizing radiation after 15 days of storage increases due to the pest sterilization effect. The optimal radiation dose is 0.8-1.0 kGy. It has been experimentally established that the quality and safety of commercial grain raw materials has a symbiotic effect on cultivation and storage technologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biohumus improved technological properties of spring wheat grain.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
biohumuse0
Outcome
technological properties of spring wheat graine0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of biohumus helped to improve the technological properties of spring wheat grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ways to improve the technological properties of commercial grain and ensure its preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six tonnes per hectare of biohumus was most effective for increasing gluten.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
6 t / ha of biohumuse0
Outcome
glutene0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective dose is 6 t / ha of biohumus for increasing gluten, macronutrient content and reducing the concentration of toxic elements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ways to improve the technological properties of commercial grain and ensure its preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six tonnes per hectare of biohumus was most effective for increasing macronutrient content.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
6 t / ha of biohumuse0
Outcome
macronutrient contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective dose is 6 t / ha of biohumus for increasing gluten, macronutrient content and reducing the concentration of toxic elements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ways to improve the technological properties of commercial grain and ensure its preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six tonnes per hectare of biohumus was most effective for reducing toxic element concentration.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
6 t / ha of biohumuse0
Outcome
concentration of toxic elementse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective dose is 6 t / ha of biohumus for increasing gluten, macronutrient content and reducing the concentration of toxic elements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ways to improve the technological properties of commercial grain and ensure its preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ionizing radiation decreased microbes in commercial grain after threshing.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
ionizing radiatione0
Outcome
microbial environmente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of ionizing radiation contributed to a decrease in the microbial environment and the population of pests present in the mass of commercial grain after threshing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ways to improve the technological properties of commercial grain and ensure its preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ionizing radiation decreased pest populations in commercial grain after threshing.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
ionizing radiatione0
Interactor
pestse0pest
Outcome
population of pestse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of ionizing radiation contributed to a decrease in the microbial environment and the population of pests present in the mass of commercial grain after threshing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ways to improve the technological properties of commercial grain and ensure its preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–591 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation treatment efficiency increased after fifteen days of storage through pest sterilization.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Interactor
peste0pest
Outcome
efficiency of treatment with ionizing radiatione0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
after 15 days of storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficiency of treatment with ionizing radiation after 15 days of storage increases due to the pest sterilization effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ways to improve the technological properties of commercial grain and ensure its preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–591 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify 0.8-1.0 kGy as the optimal radiation dose.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
optimal radiation dosee0
Value
0.8-1.0 kGye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal radiation dose is 0.8-1.0 kGy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ways to improve the technological properties of commercial grain and ensure its preservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–591 · show in text ↑

radiation · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.