Paper · 2021 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Evaluation of biorational pesticides against Bemisia tabaci Gennadius and Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida and its impact on natural enemies population in cowpea ecosystem

Satyapriya Singh; Biswajit Das; H. Lembisana Devi; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Gennadius) and leafhopper (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida) are two major sucking pests causing considerable damage in cowpea production. Considering the negative impact of chemical pesticides on food safety, environment, and human welfare; an eco-friendly approach is aimed at utilizing naturally derived products for effective management of the aforesaid pests and maintain ecological balance. The present study was performed under field conditions to evaluate the performance of five naturally derived components [water plant extracts viz. chili (Capsicum annum), garlic (Allium sativum L.), and neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) along with cow urine in three different combinations, two formulated entomopathogenic fungi (Metarrhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana) along with one positive (Imidacloprid) and negative (water) control. The study was designed in RCBD with three replications for the years 2019 and 2020, respectively. Combined application of neem, chili, garlic, and cow urine extracts (NCGC) at 10% w/v had the highest population reduction of whitefly (0.09 & 0.10 per three leaves) and leafhopper (0.03 & 0.04 per three leaves) over both standard controls after two round of application in the year 2019 and 2020, respectively. Natural enemies (coccinellids) population was drastically reduced in positive control whereas the population build-up strengthened in all other treatments including negative control. Cowpea treated with NCGC produced a higher economic yield (1.54 Mg ha−1) than those of other treatments. The study suggests that NCGC is an effective biorational based technology for sustainable management of whitefly and leafhopper in cowpea cropping system with ensuring food safety and eco-friendly approach. This novel finding can be integrated with an integrated pest management program for diverse cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined neem, chili, garlic and cow urine extracts (NCGC) at 10% w/v gave the highest reduction of whitefly population in cowpea after two rounds of application, relative to the standard controls.

Treatment
Combined application of neem, chili, garlic, and cow urine extracts (NCGC) at 10% w/ve1
Interactor
whiteflye1pest
Outcome
population reduction of whiteflye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
0.09 & 0.10 per three leavese1
Qualifier
after two round of applicatione1
Comparator
standard controlse1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cowpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–173 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present study was performed under field conditions to evaluate the performance of five naturally derived components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–547 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of neem, chili, garlic, and cow urine extracts (NCGC) at 10% w/v had the highest population reduction of whitefly (0.09 & 0.10 per three leaves) and leafhopper (0.03 & 0.04 per three leaves) over both standard controls after two round of application in the year 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NCGC at 10% w/v gave the highest reduction of leafhopper population in cowpea after two rounds of application, relative to the standard controls.

Treatment
Combined application of neem, chili, garlic, and cow urine extracts (NCGC) at 10% w/ve1
Interactor
leafhoppere1pest
Outcome
population reductione1
Direction
higheste1
Value
0.03 & 0.04 per three leavese1
Qualifier
after two round of applicatione1
Comparator
standard controlse1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cowpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–173 · show in text ↑
e0

“The present study was performed under field conditions to evaluate the performance of five naturally derived components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–547 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined application of neem, chili, garlic, and cow urine extracts (NCGC) at 10% w/v had the highest population reduction of whitefly (0.09 & 0.10 per three leaves) and leafhopper (0.03 & 0.04 per three leaves) over both standard controls after two round of application in the year 2019 and 2020, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural enemies (coccinellids) population was drastically reduced in the positive control in cowpea.

Treatment
positive controle2
Interactor
coccinellidse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Natural enemies (coccinellids) populatione2
Direction
drastically reducede2
Comparator
all other treatments including negative controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cowpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–173 · show in text ↑
e2

“Natural enemies (coccinellids) population was drastically reduced in positive control whereas the population build-up strengthened in all other treatments including negative control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural enemy (coccinellid) population build-up strengthened in all other treatments in cowpea, compared with the positive control.

Treatment
all other treatmentse2
Interactor
coccinellidse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population build-upe2
Direction
strengthenede2
Comparator
positive controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cowpea ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 154–173 · show in text ↑
e2

“Natural enemies (coccinellids) population was drastically reduced in positive control whereas the population build-up strengthened in all other treatments including negative control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea treated with NCGC produced a higher economic yield (1.54 Mg ha−1) than other treatments.

Treatment
NCGCe3
Outcome
economic yielde3
Direction
highere3
Value
1.54 Mg ha−1e3
Comparator
other treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Cowpea treated with NCGC produced a higher economic yield (1.54 Mg ha−1) than those of other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1572 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

NCGC is an effective biorational technology for sustainable management of whitefly and leafhopper in cowpea cropping systems.

Treatment
NCGCe4
Outcome
sustainable management of whitefly and leafhoppere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The study suggests that NCGC is an effective biorational based technology for sustainable management of whitefly and leafhopper in cowpea cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1727 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Azadirachta indica · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Allium sativum · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Allium sativum · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 78 positive, 2 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

botanical · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 123 positive, 3 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.