Paper · 2017

Productivity Enhancement in Solanaceous Vegetable Crops through Integrated Crop Management Technologies

Ranjeet Singh; U.S. Gautam; Dinesh Singh

20
claims
35
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A total of 51 demonstrations were conducted by Krishi Vigyan Kendra Ghazipur of Uttar Pradesh at farmers’ field. Full gap was observed in case of use of seed treatment and partial gap was in use of varieties, method of sowing, use of fertilizers, weed management and plant protection measures while, farmers were much concerned about importance of time of sowing. The maximum reduction in insect-pest incidence was recorded in brinjal (67.19%) followed by tomato (57.87%), potato (48.94%) and chilli (43.45%) while, maximum disease incidence reduction was received in tomato (69.67%) followed by chilli (60.94%), potato (58.62%) and brinjal (52.78%). The comparative profitability of different solanaceous vegetable also revealed that among them brinjal produced maximum gross monetary return i.e. Rs. 261000/ha followed by potato Rs. 252225/ha, while, additional net returns was received in tomato Rs. 88367/ha followed by brinjal Rs. 82186/ha and lowest gross monetary return as well as additional net returns was recorded in chilli i.e. Rs. 139560/ha and Rs. 27820/ha, respectively. In all the cases, benefit cost ratio is higher in IT plots as compared to FP and maximum recorded in brinjal 5.74 in IT against 4.88 in FP. The highest incremental cost benefit ratio was 10.68 in tomato followed by 9.00 in brinjal, 8.95 in chilli and 8.82 in potato, indicating a good return of each additional rupee invested on IT in all the crops separately. The outcome of the trial inspired the farming communities to replace their old non-descriptive varieties with high yielding varieties and other technological options including IPM strategies which are being adopted in their cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment showed a full adoption gap in the demonstrations.

Taxon
Solanaceous Vegetable Cropst0
Outcome
Full gap was observed in case of use of seed treatmente0

Verbatim

e0

“Full gap was observed in case of use of seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Solanaceous Vegetable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties, sowing method, fertilizers, weed management and plant protection showed partial adoption gaps.

Taxon
Solanaceous Vegetable Cropst0
Outcome
partial gap was in use of varieties, method of sowing, use of fertilizers, weed management and plant protection measurese0

Verbatim

e0

“partial gap was in use of varieties, method of sowing, use of fertilizers, weed management and plant protection measures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Solanaceous Vegetable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brinjal had a 67.19% reduction in insect pest incidence.

Treatment
Integrated Crop Management Technologiest0
Interactor
insect-peste0pest
Outcome
insect-pest incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
67.19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduction in insect-pest incidence was recorded in brinjal (67.19%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–443 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated Crop Management Technologies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato had a 57.87% reduction in insect pest incidence.

Treatment
Integrated Crop Management Technologiest0
Interactor
insect-peste1pest
Outcome
insect-pest incidencee1
Direction
reductione1
Value
57.87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (57.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–471 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduction in insect-pest incidence was recorded in brinjal (67.19%) followed by tomato (57.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated Crop Management Technologies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato had a 48.94% reduction in insect pest incidence.

Treatment
Integrated Crop Management Technologiest0
Interactor
insect-peste0pest
Outcome
insect-pest incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
48.94%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction in insect-pest incidence was recorded in brinjal (67.19%) followed by tomato (57.87%), potato (48.94%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated Crop Management Technologies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli had a 43.45% reduction in insect pest incidence.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Integrated Crop Management Technologiest0
Interactor
insect-peste0pest
Outcome
insect-pest incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
43.45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction in insect-pest incidence was recorded in brinjal (67.19%) followed by tomato (57.87%), potato (48.94%) and chilli (43.45%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated Crop Management Technologies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato had a 69.67% reduction in disease incidence.

Treatment
Integrated Crop Management Technologiest0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
69.67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease incidence reduction was received in tomato (69.67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated Crop Management Technologies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli had a 60.94% reduction in disease incidence.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Integrated Crop Management Technologiest0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
60.94%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“disease incidence reduction was received in tomato (69.67%) followed by chilli (60.94%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated Crop Management Technologies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato had a 58.62% reduction in disease incidence.

Treatment
Integrated Crop Management Technologiest0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
58.62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease incidence reduction was received in tomato (69.67%) followed by chilli (60.94%), potato (58.62%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated Crop Management Technologies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brinjal had a 52.78% reduction in disease incidence.

Treatment
Integrated Crop Management Technologiest0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
52.78%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease incidence reduction was received in tomato (69.67%) followed by chilli (60.94%), potato (58.62%) and brinjal (52.78%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Integrated Crop Management Technologies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brinjal gross monetary return was Rs. 261000/ha, the highest among the vegetables.

Outcome
gross monetary returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 261000/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“brinjal produced maximum gross monetary return i.e. Rs. 261000/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–811 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato gross monetary return was Rs. 252225/ha.

Outcome
gross monetary returne1
Value
Rs. 252225/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato Rs. 252225/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–844 · show in text ↑
e1

“gross monetary return i.e. Rs. 261000/ha followed by potato Rs. 252225/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato additional net returns were Rs. 88367/ha.

Outcome
additional net returnse0
Value
Rs. 88367/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“additional net returns was received in tomato Rs. 88367/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–911 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brinjal additional net returns were Rs. 82186/ha.

Outcome
additional net returnse0
Value
Rs. 82186/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“additional net returns was received in tomato Rs. 88367/ha followed by brinjal Rs. 82186/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–944 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli had the lowest gross monetary return, Rs. 139560/ha.

Taxon
chillie0
Outcome
gross monetary returne0
Direction
loweste0
Value
Rs. 139560/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“lowest gross monetary return as well as additional net returns was recorded in chilli i.e. Rs. 139560/ha and Rs. 27820/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1084 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli had the lowest additional net returns, Rs. 27820/ha.

Taxon
chillie0
Outcome
additional net returnse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
Rs. 27820/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“lowest gross monetary return as well as additional net returns was recorded in chilli i.e. Rs. 139560/ha and Rs. 27820/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit cost ratios were higher in integrated technology plots than farmer practice plots for all crops.

Taxon
Solanaceous Vegetable Cropst0
Treatment
IT plotse0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
FPe0

Verbatim

e0

“In all the cases, benefit cost ratio is higher in IT plots as compared to FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“Solanaceous Vegetable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brinjal benefit cost ratio was 5.74 with integrated technology versus 4.88 with farmer practice.

Treatment
ITe0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
highere1
Value
5.74e0
Qualifier
4.88 in FPe0
Comparator
FPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum recorded in brinjal 5.74 in IT against 4.88 in FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“benefit cost ratio is higher in IT plots as compared to FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato had the highest incremental cost benefit ratio, 10.68.

Outcome
incremental cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.68e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest incremental cost benefit ratio was 10.68 in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1288 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incremental cost benefit ratios were 9.00 in brinjal, 8.95 in chilli and 8.82 in potato.

Outcome
incremental cost benefit ratioe1
Value
9.00e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“9.00 in brinjal, 8.95 in chilli and 8.82 in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1351 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest incremental cost benefit ratio was 10.68 in tomato followed by 9.00 in brinjal, 8.95 in chilli and 8.82 in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1351 · show in text ↑

ipm · disease · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

ipm · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

ipm · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.