Abstract
This study was conducted in mind-hills of Uttarakhand situated in North West Himalayas (NWH). The IPM module (seed treatment: drenching and root dip @ 1% with Trichoderma harzianum, mancobez sprays @ 0.25% and HaNPV @ 250 LE/ha (two spray) installation of pheromone trap, staking & removal of lower leaves, 9” from the soil and one row of marigold after 16 lines of tomato) was validated at farmers fields. Higher emergence of tomato seedling (65–80%) was recorded in bioagent treated seed at raised beds than untreated seed in flat bed traditionally (40%) followed under farmers practice. Pre-emergence rot in the nursery was controlled to the extent of 41.7–66.7 percent over untreated and flat bed system. On an average 60 percent control of early blight was achieved with IPM practices compared to non-IPM practices. Buckeye rot was immensely reduced (85.7%) with staking and removal of lower leaves followed by single spray of mancozeb over unstaked and unsprayed tomato plants emphasizing the significant role of staking in the control of this disease. Staking HaNPV and trap crop of marigold recorded 5 per cent borer attack compared to 18 per cent in untreated fields giving 72.2 per cent control of fruit borer. The integrated crop management along with IPM module contributed greatly in attaining economically higher yield than traditional practices. Thus, adoption of IPM module is an economically viable and profitable venture in NWH for healthy tomato production as revealed by B:C ratio obtained by the participatory farmers.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Bioagent-treated seed on raised beds had 65–80% seedling emergence versus 40% for untreated seed on flat beds.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- bioagent treated seed at raised bedse0
- Outcome
- emergence of tomato seedlinge0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 65–80%e0
- Qualifier
- 40%e0
- Comparator
- untreated seed in flat bede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher emergence of tomato seedling (65–80%) was recorded in bioagent treated seed at raised beds than untreated seed in flat bed traditionally (40%) followed under farmers practice.”
Claim · model-written summary
The nursery treatment controlled pre-emergence rot by 41.7–66.7 percent relative to untreated flat-bed practice.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Outcome
- Pre-emergence rote0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 41.7–66.7 percente0
- Comparator
- untreated and flat bed systeme0
- Setting
- nurserye0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pre-emergence rot in the nursery was controlled to the extent of 41.7–66.7 percent over untreated and flat bed system.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
IPM practices achieved an average 60 percent control of early blight relative to non-IPM practices.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- IPM practicese0
- Outcome
- early blighte0
- Direction
- controle0
- Value
- 60 percente0
- Comparator
- non-IPM practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On an average 60 percent control of early blight was achieved with IPM practices compared to non-IPM practices.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Staking, removal of lower leaves and one mancozeb spray reduced buckeye rot by 85.7% versus unstaked unsprayed plants.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- staking and removal of lower leaves followed by single spray of mancozebe0
- Outcome
- Buckeye rote0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 85.7%e0
- Comparator
- unstaked and unsprayed tomato plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Buckeye rot was immensely reduced (85.7%) with staking and removal of lower leaves followed by single spray of mancozeb over unstaked and unsprayed tomato plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Staking, HaNPV and marigold trap crop were associated with 5 per cent fruit-borer attack versus 18 per cent untreated, or 72.2 per cent control.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Staking HaNPV and trap crop of marigolde0
- Interactor
- fruit borere0pest
- Outcome
- borer attacke0
- Direction
- controle0
- Value
- 72.2 per cente0
- Qualifier
- 5 per cent borer attack compared to 18 per cente0
- Comparator
- untreated fieldse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Staking HaNPV and trap crop of marigold recorded 5 per cent borer attack compared to 18 per cent in untreated fields giving 72.2 per cent control of fruit borer.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated crop management with the IPM module produced economically higher yield than traditional practices.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- integrated crop management along with IPM modulee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- traditional practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The integrated crop management along with IPM module contributed greatly in attaining economically higher yield than traditional practices.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that adopting the IPM module is economically viable and profitable for healthy tomato production in NWH.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Outcome
- adoption of IPM modulee0
- Setting
- NWHe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“adoption of IPM module is an economically viable and profitable venture in NWH for healthy tomato production”
The same questions in other papers
mancozeb · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →tillage · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →ipm · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →biocontrol · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →application · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
133 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
146 papers more in this group
See all 150 papers →ipm · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.