Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biological control agent treatment did not change the dry weight of broomrape shoots among treatments.

A claim from Management of Egyptian broomrape [Phelipanche aegyptiaca (Pers.) Pomel] using biofungicide (Trichoderma spp.) in tomato · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological control agent treatment did not change the dry weight of broomrape shoots among treatments.

Treatment
BCAe7
Outcome
dry weight of the shootse6
Direction
no significant differencee6
Comparator
among treatmentse6
Setting
controlled greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a commercial bioproduct containing Trichoderma asperellum strain ICC012 and Trichoderma gamsii strain ICC080, against P. aegyptiaca in tomato. The experiment was conducted under controlled greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–416
e1

“Phelipanche aegyptiaca (Pers.) Pomel, commonly known as Egyptian broomrape, is a root parasitic plant that causes significant yield losses in tomato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–159
e6

“there was no significant difference in the dry weight of the shoots among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1397
e7

“BCA did not significantly alter the weights of aerial parts and the roots of tomato compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1506

Title

Management of Egyptian broomrape [Phelipanche aegyptiaca (Pers.) Pomel] using biofungicide (Trichoderma spp.) in tomato

Esra Çiğnitaş; Gürkan Başbağcı Bitki Koruma Bülteni 2025. doi:10.16955/bitkorb.1657350

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a0bc26201bd95a290ce080a75f80a5474d9c286c33c1990fed18920c421c52ce · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

biocontrol · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

28 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.