Abstract
Low production in rice sector was one of besetting problem in Malaysia. As the demand of the rice is continuously increasing especially in Asian region, production of rice should also be increased. A study was conducted to see the effect of late foliar application on the grain production of rice. By applying the foliar fertilizer during later stage of rice growth, the nutrient can be directly absorbed by the rice for grain production, instead of vegetative development. This study conducted in greenhouse located at UiTM Jasin by using Randomized Control Block Design (RCBD). The treatments were application of different dosage of foliar fertilizer in two varieties of rice, MR 219 and MR 269 to see the effectiveness in improving grain production. Treatment one act as control with 0% of foliar application, treatment 2 with 50% of foliar application, treatment 3 with 100% and treatment 4 with 150% dosage. SPAD, height, grain, panicle, straw and biomass were measured during the study. Plant height, SPAD, panicle, straw, did not showed any significant difference among the treatment but result in grain, 100 grain, and straw show significant difference between the treatment. Applying foliar fertilizer in treatment 2, 3 and 4, there was a different in total weight comparing with treatment 1. Result also showed weight in 100 grain between treatment is different. There was higher 100 grain in treatment 4 comparing with other.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height, SPAD and panicle did not differ significantly among the foliar fertilizer treatments.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1 - Material
- MR 219 and MR 269e1
- Treatment
- application of different dosage of foliar fertilizere1
- Outcome
- Plant height, SPAD, paniclee3
- Direction
- did not showed any significant differencee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The treatments were application of different dosage of foliar fertilizer in two varieties of rice, MR 219 and MR 269”
e3“Plant height, SPAD, panicle, straw, did not showed any significant difference among the treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw did not differ significantly among the foliar fertilizer treatments.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Material
- MR 219 and MR 269e1
- Treatment
- application of different dosage of foliar fertilizere1
- Outcome
- strawe3
- Direction
- did not showed any significant differencee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The treatments were application of different dosage of foliar fertilizer in two varieties of rice, MR 219 and MR 269”
e3“Plant height, SPAD, panicle, straw, did not showed any significant difference among the treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain, 100-grain weight and straw differed significantly among the foliar fertilizer treatments.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Material
- MR 219 and MR 269e1
- Treatment
- application of different dosage of foliar fertilizere1
- Outcome
- grain, 100 grain, and strawe4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The treatments were application of different dosage of foliar fertilizer in two varieties of rice, MR 219 and MR 269”
e4“result in grain, 100 grain, and straw show significant difference between the treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying foliar fertilizer in treatments 2, 3 and 4 gave a different total weight from treatment 1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Material
- MR 219 and MR 269e1
- Treatment
- Applying foliar fertilizer in treatment 2, 3 and 4e5
- Outcome
- total weighte5
- Comparator
- treatment 1e5
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The treatments were application of different dosage of foliar fertilizer in two varieties of rice, MR 219 and MR 269”
e5“Applying foliar fertilizer in treatment 2, 3 and 4, there was a different in total weight comparing with treatment 1”
Claim · model-written summary
The 150% foliar fertilizer dosage gave higher 100-grain weight than the other treatments.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Material
- MR 219 and MR 269e1
- Treatment
- treatment 4 with 150% dosagee2
- Outcome
- 100 graine6
- Direction
- highere6
- Comparator
- othere6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The treatments were application of different dosage of foliar fertilizer in two varieties of rice, MR 219 and MR 269”
e2“Treatment one act as control with 0% of foliar application, treatment 2 with 50% of foliar application, treatment 3 with 100% and treatment 4 with 150% dosage”
e6“There was higher 100 grain in treatment 4 comparing with other”
The same questions in other papers
application · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →fertilization · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 645 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
687 papers more in this group
See all 691 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
271 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,183 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.