Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Morphological and agroecological study of Purwoceng Gunung (Artemisia lactiflora wall.) in areas slopes of mount Lawu

B Pujiasmanto; M T S Budiastuti; D Setyaningrum; et al.

20
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to determine the distribution pattern, morphological and agroecological characteristics of Purwoceng Gunung. The research location on the slopes of Mount Lawu, around the Grojogan Sewu, Tawangmangu sub-district. The sampling point was determined based on purposive random sampling through a pre-survey. Determination of sample plots and analysis of vegetation using the transect (line) method. The results showed that the stem shape was round and segmented, smooth surface and green, oval leaf shape with serrated edges, compound leaves, pointed leaf tip, blunt leaf base, green leaf color with a length of 4 cm and a width of ± 2 cm. The location of the flowers at the end of the stem and classified as compound interest, fibrous roots with yellowish white color. The distribution pattern of Purwoceng Gunung was uniform with low population density of 6 individuals per plot and an INP of 4.4. Habitat agroecological conditions with climate type C with the following soil chemistry: C organic 5.8%, organic matter 9.9%, N 0.27 %, P 16.04 %, K 0.27 %, pH NaF 9.02, pH H2O 6.1, CEC 26, 9 me 100 g-1, field capacity 43.9. The proportions of dust, clay and sand were 27.4%, 9.4% and 63.2% respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stems were round, segmented, smooth and green.

Taxon
Purwoceng Gunungt0
Outcome
stem shape was round and segmented, smooth surface and greene0

Verbatim

e0

“the stem shape was round and segmented, smooth surface and green”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Purwoceng Gunung”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves were oval, serrated, compound and green, with pointed tips and blunt bases.

Taxon
Purwoceng Gunungt0
Outcome
oval leaf shape with serrated edges, compound leaves, pointed leaf tip, blunt leaf base, green leaf colore0

Verbatim

e0

“oval leaf shape with serrated edges, compound leaves, pointed leaf tip, blunt leaf base, green leaf color with a length of 4 cm and a width of ± 2 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Purwoceng Gunung”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf length was 4 cm.

Taxon
Purwoceng Gunungt0
Outcome
lengthe0
Value
4 cme0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“green leaf color with a length of 4 cm and a width of ± 2 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Purwoceng Gunung”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf width was approximately 2 cm.

Taxon
Purwoceng Gunungt0
Outcome
widthe0
Value
± 2 cme0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“green leaf color with a length of 4 cm and a width of ± 2 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Purwoceng Gunung”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowers occurred at stem ends and were classified as compound; roots were fibrous and yellowish white.

Taxon
Purwoceng Gunungt0
Outcome
flowers at the end of the stem and classified as compound interest, fibrous roots with yellowish white colore0

Verbatim

e0

“The location of the flowers at the end of the stem and classified as compound interest, fibrous roots with yellowish white color.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Purwoceng Gunung”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Purwoceng Gunung had a uniform distribution pattern.

Taxon
Purwoceng Gununge0
Outcome
distribution patterne0
Qualifier
uniforme0

Verbatim

e0

“The distribution pattern of Purwoceng Gunung was uniform with low population density of 6 individuals per plot and an INP of 4.4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–919 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Population density was low at 6 individuals per plot.

Taxon
Purwoceng Gununge0
Outcome
population densitye0
Direction
lowe0
Value
6 individuals per plote0

Verbatim

e0

“The distribution pattern of Purwoceng Gunung was uniform with low population density of 6 individuals per plot and an INP of 4.4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–919 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INP was 4.4.

Taxon
Purwoceng Gununge0
Outcome
INPe0
Value
4.4e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The distribution pattern of Purwoceng Gunung was uniform with low population density of 6 individuals per plot and an INP of 4.4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–919 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Habitat climate was type C.

Outcome
climate type Ce0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Habitat agroecological conditions with climate type C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–973 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Habitat soil organic C was 5.8%.

Outcome
C organice0
Value
5.8%e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“soil chemistry: C organic 5.8%, organic matter 9.9%, N 0.27 %, P 16.04 %, K 0.27 %, pH NaF 9.02, pH H2O 6.1, CEC 26, 9 me 100 g-1, field capacity 43.9.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter was 9.9%.

Outcome
organic mattere0
Value
9.9%e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“organic matter 9.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1044 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N was 0.27%.

Outcome
Ne0
Value
0.27 %e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“N 0.27 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1054 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P was 16.04%.

Outcome
Pe0
Value
16.04 %e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“P 16.04 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1065 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil K was 0.27%.

Outcome
Ke0
Value
0.27 %e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“K 0.27 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1075 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH NaF was 9.02.

Outcome
pH NaFe0
Value
9.02e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“pH NaF 9.02”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH H2O was 6.1.

Outcome
pH H2Oe0
Value
6.1e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“pH H2O 6.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil CEC was 26, 9 me 100 g-1.

Outcome
CECe0
Value
26, 9 me 100 g-1e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“CEC 26, 9 me 100 g-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field capacity was 43.9.

Outcome
field capacitye0
Value
43.9e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“field capacity 43.9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1143 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dust and clay proportions were 27.4% and 9.4%, respectively.

Outcome
dust, claye0
Value
27.4%, 9.4%e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The proportions of dust, clay and sand were 27.4%, 9.4% and 63.2% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1224 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sand proportion was 63.2%.

Outcome
sande0
Value
63.2%e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The proportions of dust, clay and sand were 27.4%, 9.4% and 63.2% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1224 · show in text ↑