Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Plant Science

The Physiological Effect of a Holoparasite Over a Cactus Along an Environmental Gradient

Carmen Gloria Ossa; Daniela Aros-Mualin; María Isabel Mujica; et al.

13
claims
33
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus from Chile, distributed in a temperature and rainfall gradient between 30° and 35° South latitude, with mean temperatures increasing and precipitation decreasing toward the north. It is the main host of the mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus , a holoparasite completely dependent on the cactus for water, carbon, and minerals. In this study, we investigated the consequences of parasitism over the fitness and physiology of this cactus throughout its distribution range and how it is affected by the environment. We measured five functional traits in eight populations latitudinally distributed, the first three only for the host: reproductive fitness, stomatal traits (density and size), and photosynthesis (during winter and summer); and the last two for the host and parasite: stable isotopes (∂ 13 C and ∂ 15 N), and nutrients (carbon and nitrogen content). The results showed a negative effect of parasitism over fitness of infected cacti. However, the higher nitrogen concentrations in cactus tissues toward the south improved overall fitness. Regarding photosynthesis, we only observed a negative effect of parasitism during the dry season (summer), which is also negatively affected by the increase in summer temperatures and decrease in winter rainfall toward the north. There were no differences in nutrient concentration or in the isotopic signature of healthy and infected cacti. Conversely, we observed a higher carbon and lower nitrogen concentration in mistletoes than in cacti regardless of latitude. The loss of temperature seasonality toward the north increases the C:N ratio, and the values between the parasite and its host diverge. ∂ 15 N was similar between parasites and hosts while ∂ 13 C of the parasite was enriched when compared to its host. Overall, the infection by T. aphyllus affects Echinopsis chiloensis fitness but showed no strong effects over the cactus physiology, except for the summer photosynthesis. Therefore, our data revealed that E. chiloensis response to T. aphyllus infection is sensitive to environmental changes in a way that could be strongly impacted by the desertification projected for this area due to climate change.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitism reduced infected cactus reproductive fitness.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Interactor
Tristerix aphyllusTristerix aphylluse2parasite
Outcome
fitness of infected cactie0
Direction
negative effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tristerix aphyllus
Tristerix aphyllus · InteractorPato Novoa · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed a negative effect of parasitism over fitness of infected cacti.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–981 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“It is the main host of the mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus , a holoparasite completely dependent on the cactus for water, carbon, and minerals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–363 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher cactus tissue nitrogen toward the south improved overall fitness.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Compound
nitrogene0
Outcome
overall fitnesse0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
toward the southe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the higher nitrogen concentrations in cactus tissues toward the south improved overall fitness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitism reduced cactus photosynthesis during summer.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Interactor
Tristerix aphyllusTristerix aphylluse2parasite
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
negative effecte0
Qualifier
dry season (summer)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tristerix aphyllus
Tristerix aphyllus · InteractorPato Novoa · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding photosynthesis, we only observed a negative effect of parasitism during the dry season (summer), which is also negatively affected by the increase in summer temperatures and decrease in winter rainfall toward the north.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1316 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“It is the main host of the mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus , a holoparasite completely dependent on the cactus for water, carbon, and minerals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–363 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Northward summer warming was associated with lower cactus photosynthesis.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
negatively affectede0
Qualifier
increase in summer temperaturese0
Setting
toward the northe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding photosynthesis, we only observed a negative effect of parasitism during the dry season (summer), which is also negatively affected by the increase in summer temperatures and decrease in winter rainfall toward the north.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1316 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Northward decline in winter rainfall was associated with lower cactus photosynthesis.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
negatively affectede0
Qualifier
decrease in winter rainfalle0
Setting
toward the northe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding photosynthesis, we only observed a negative effect of parasitism during the dry season (summer), which is also negatively affected by the increase in summer temperatures and decrease in winter rainfall toward the north.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1316 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Healthy and infected cacti had no nutrient concentration differences.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Outcome
nutrient concentratione0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
healthy and infected cactie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no differences in nutrient concentration or in the isotopic signature of healthy and infected cacti.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1428 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Healthy and infected cacti had no isotopic signature differences.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Outcome
isotopic signaturee0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
healthy and infected cactie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no differences in nutrient concentration or in the isotopic signature of healthy and infected cacti.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1428 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mistletoes had higher carbon concentration than cacti regardless of latitude.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Interactor
Tristerix aphyllusTristerix aphylluse2parasite
Outcome
carbone0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cactie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tristerix aphyllus
Tristerix aphyllus · InteractorPato Novoa · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conversely, we observed a higher carbon and lower nitrogen concentration in mistletoes than in cacti regardless of latitude.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1553 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“It is the main host of the mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus , a holoparasite completely dependent on the cactus for water, carbon, and minerals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mistletoes had lower nitrogen concentration than cacti regardless of latitude.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Interactor
Tristerix aphyllusTristerix aphylluse2parasite
Outcome
nitrogen concentration in mistletoese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
cactie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tristerix aphyllus
Tristerix aphyllus · InteractorPato Novoa · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conversely, we observed a higher carbon and lower nitrogen concentration in mistletoes than in cacti regardless of latitude.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1553 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“It is the main host of the mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus , a holoparasite completely dependent on the cactus for water, carbon, and minerals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–363 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Loss of temperature seasonality northward increased the C:N ratio.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Outcome
C:N ratioe0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
loss of temperature seasonalitye0
Setting
toward the northe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The loss of temperature seasonality toward the north increases the C:N ratio, and the values between the parasite and its host diverge.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1689 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C:N ratios of parasite and host diverged northward.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Interactor
Tristerix aphyllusTristerix aphylluse2parasite
Outcome
values between the parasite and its hoste0
Direction
divergee0
Setting
toward the northe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tristerix aphyllus
Tristerix aphyllus · InteractorPato Novoa · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The loss of temperature seasonality toward the north increases the C:N ratio, and the values between the parasite and its host diverge.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1689 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“It is the main host of the mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus , a holoparasite completely dependent on the cactus for water, carbon, and minerals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasites and hosts had similar ∂ 15 N.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Interactor
Tristerix aphyllusTristerix aphylluse2parasite
Outcome
∂ 15 Ne0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
parasites and hostse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tristerix aphyllus
Tristerix aphyllus · InteractorPato Novoa · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“∂ 15 N was similar between parasites and hosts while ∂ 13 C of the parasite was enriched when compared to its host.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1805 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“It is the main host of the mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus , a holoparasite completely dependent on the cactus for water, carbon, and minerals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasite ∂ 13 C was enriched relative to host.

Taxon
Echinopsis chiloensisLeucostele chiloensise1
Interactor
Tristerix aphyllusTristerix aphylluse2parasite
Outcome
∂ 13 C of the parasitee0
Direction
enrichede0
Comparator
its hoste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leucostele chiloensis
Leucostele chiloensis · TaxonNutri Gabi Barrera · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tristerix aphyllus
Tristerix aphyllus · InteractorPato Novoa · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“∂ 15 N was similar between parasites and hosts while ∂ 13 C of the parasite was enriched when compared to its host.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1805 · show in text ↑
e1

“Echinopsis chiloensis is an endemic cactus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“It is the main host of the mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus , a holoparasite completely dependent on the cactus for water, carbon, and minerals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–363 · show in text ↑