Paper · 2021 · BMC Plant Biology

Impact of nanophos in agriculture to improve functional bacterial community and crop productivity

Parul Chaudhary; Anuj Chaudhary; Heena Parveen; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
60
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the World's population is increasing, it's critical to boost agricultural productivity to meet the rising demand for food and reduce poverty. Fertilizers are widely used in traditional agricultural methods to improve crop yield, but they have a number of negative environmental consequences such as nutrient losses, decrease fertility and polluted water and air. Researchers have been focusing on alternative crop fertilizers mechanisms to address these issues in recent years and nanobiofertilizers have frequently been suggested. "Nanophos" is a biofertilizer and contains phosphate-solubilising bacteria that solubilises insoluble phosphate and makes it available to the plants for improved growth and productivity as well as maintain soil health. This study evaluated the impact of nanophos on the growth and development of maize plants and its rhizospheric microbial community such as NPK solubilising microbes, soil enzyme activities and soil protein under field condition after 20, 40 and 60 days in randomized block design. RESULTS: Maize seeds treated with nanophos showed improvement in germination of seeds, plant height, number of leaves, photosynthetic pigments, total sugar and protein level over control. A higher activity of phenol, flavonoid, antioxidant activities and yield were noticed in nanophos treated plants over control. Positive shift in total bacterial count, nitrogen fixing bacteria, phosphate and potassium solubilizers were observed in the presence of nanophos as compared to control. Soil enzyme activities were significantly (P < 0.05) improved in treated soil and showed moderately correlation between treatments estimated using Spearman rank correlation test. Real time PCR and total soil protein content analysis showed enhanced microbial population in nanophos treated soil. Obtained results showed that nanophos improved the soil microbial population and thus improved the plant growth and productivity. CONCLUSION: The study concluded a stimulating effect of nanophos on Zea mays health and productivity and indicates good response towards total bacterial, NPK solubilising bacteria, soil enzymes, soil protein which equally showed positive response towards soil nutrient status. It can be a potential way to boost soil nutrient use efficiency and can be a better alternative to fertilizers used in the agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanophos improved seed germination, plant height and leaf number versus control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nanophose0
Outcome
germination of seeds, plant height, number of leavese0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize seeds treated with nanophos showed improvement in germination of seeds, plant height, number of leaves, photosynthetic pigments, total sugar and protein level over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanophos improved photosynthetic pigments, sugar and protein versus control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nanophose0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments, total sugar and protein levele0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize seeds treated with nanophos showed improvement in germination of seeds, plant height, number of leaves, photosynthetic pigments, total sugar and protein level over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanophos raised phenol, flavonoid and antioxidant activities.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
nanophose0
Outcome
activity of phenol, flavonoid, antioxidant activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher activity of phenol, flavonoid, antioxidant activities and yield were noticed in nanophos treated plants over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays health and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanophos raised yield.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
nanophose0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher activity of phenol, flavonoid, antioxidant activities and yield were noticed in nanophos treated plants over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays health and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanophos increased total bacteria, nitrogen fixers and phosphate solubilizers.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
nanophose0
Outcome
total bacterial count, nitrogen fixing bacteria, phosphatee0
Direction
Positive shifte0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive shift in total bacterial count, nitrogen fixing bacteria, phosphate and potassium solubilizers were observed in the presence of nanophos as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays health and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanophos increased potassium solubilizers.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
nanophose0
Outcome
potassium solubilizerse0
Direction
Positive shifte0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive shift in total bacterial count, nitrogen fixing bacteria, phosphate and potassium solubilizers were observed in the presence of nanophos as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays health and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanophos significantly increased soil enzyme activities.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
treated soile0
Outcome
Soil enzyme activitiese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil enzyme activities were significantly (P < 0.05) improved in treated soil and showed moderately correlation between treatments estimated using Spearman rank correlation test.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays health and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Real time PCR and protein analysis indicated enhanced soil microbial populations after nanophos.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
nanophose0
Outcome
microbial populatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Real time PCR and total soil protein content analysis showed enhanced microbial population in nanophos treated soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1830 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays health and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2061 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose nanophos as an alternative fertilizer to boost soil nutrient use efficiency.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Outcome
boost soil nutrient use efficiencye0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It can be a potential way to boost soil nutrient use efficiency and can be a better alternative to fertilizers used in the agriculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2238–2373 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays health and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2061 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · molecular: expression · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: phytochemicals · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 161 positive, 21 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

233 papers: 215 positive, 18 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

229 papers more in this group

See all 233 papers →

nanoparticle · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.