Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences

Effect of fertilizers type and watering methods on the agronomic performance of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown on substrate in southern Côte d'Ivoire

Koffi Bertin Yao; Kouassi Joseph Kouakou; Koffi Adjoumani; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) is a plant of great importance for food, agriculture, economy and medicine. This importance explains its high demand, intensified by its cultivation conditions, particularly the growing rarity of fertile land and available water. To contribute to this species yield optimization, the effects of fertilizers type [chemical: NPK (12-22-22) and organic: Agribionate] and a control (C) combined to two watering modes (traditional sprinkler and bottle drip) on plants growth and yield have been studied from sowing to harvest. Plant growth (stem length and diameter at the collar, number of leaves and flowers per plant, leaf area) and yield (fruit weight, diameter and length, yield) were assessed. ANOVA2 tests revealed that fertilization (NPK and agribionate) favored plant growth (respectively 34.20 and 37.32 cm in height against 6.67 cm) and increased yield (7498, 66 and 6600.46 Kg/ha against 1558 Kg/ha) with the largest and heaviest fruits (145.69 and 142.80 g) compared to the control (C) that produced the smallest ones (59.35 g). About watering, the bottle drip mode was more beneficial than traditional sprinkler one for cucumber organ growth and plant yield. The interaction (fertilizer type × watering mode) indicated that the best results were obtained with the Agribionate fertilizer watered with the bottle drip method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased cucumber height to 34.20 cm versus 6.67 cm control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0t0
Treatment
NPKe0t0
Outcome
heighte0t0
Direction
favorede0t0
Value
34.20e0t0
Comparator
6.67 cme0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization (NPK and agribionate) favored plant growth (respectively 34.20 and 37.32 cm in height against 6.67 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agribionate increased cucumber height to 37.32 cm.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0t0
Treatment
agribionatee0t0
Outcome
heighte0t0
Direction
favorede0t0
Value
37.32 cme0t0
Comparator
6.67 cme0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization (NPK and agribionate) favored plant growth (respectively 34.20 and 37.32 cm in height against 6.67 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK increased cucumber yield to 7498, 66 Kg/ha.

Treatment
NPKe0e1t0
Outcome
yielde0e1t0
Direction
increasede0e1t0
Value
7498, 66e0e1t0
Comparator
1558 Kg/hae0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased yield (7498, 66 and 6600.46 Kg/ha against 1558 Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–936 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilization (NPK and agribionate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agribionate increased cucumber yield to 6600.46 Kg/ha.

Treatment
agribionatee0e1t0
Outcome
yielde0e1t0
Direction
increasede0e1t0
Value
6600.46 Kg/hae0e1t0
Comparator
1558 Kg/hae0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased yield (7498, 66 and 6600.46 Kg/ha against 1558 Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–936 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilization (NPK and agribionate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK produced 145.69 g fruits.

Treatment
NPKe0e1t0
Outcome
heaviest fruitse0e1t0
Direction
heavieste0e1t0
Value
145.69e0e1t0
Comparator
control (C)e0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“largest and heaviest fruits (145.69 and 142.80 g) compared to the control (C) that produced the smallest ones (59.35 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilization (NPK and agribionate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agribionate produced 142.80 g fruits.

Treatment
agribionatee0e1t0
Outcome
heaviest fruitse0e1t0
Direction
heavieste0e1t0
Value
142.80 ge0e1t0
Comparator
control (C)e0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“largest and heaviest fruits (145.69 and 142.80 g) compared to the control (C) that produced the smallest ones (59.35 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilization (NPK and agribionate)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bottle drip improved organ growth and yield over sprinkler watering.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
bottle drip modee0
Outcome
organ growth and plant yielde0
Direction
more beneficiale0
Comparator
traditional sprinklere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bottle drip mode was more beneficial than traditional sprinkler one for cucumber organ growth and plant yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agribionate plus bottle drip yielded the best results.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0t0
Treatment
Agribionate fertilizer watered with the bottle drip methode0t0
Outcome
best resultse0t0
Direction
beste0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best results were obtained with the Agribionate fertilizer watered with the bottle drip method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–88 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 179 positive, 23 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.