Paper · 2021 · Open Agriculture

Influence of integrated soil fertilization on the productivity and economic return of garlic (Allium sativum L.) and soil fertility in northwest Ethiopian highlands

Getachew Alemayehu; Asefa Abate

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Garlic ( Allium sativum L.) is one of the main economical spices produced by poor smallholder farmers in the highlands of Ethiopia for both marketing and consumption. However, its productivity in the area has ever been declining mainly due to soil fertility depletion. Hence, an experiment was conducted under irrigation for two years in 2017 and 2018 in one of northwest Ethiopian highlands known as Lay Gayint to assess the productivity response of garlic to NPS inorganic fertilizers and cattle manure applications. Factorial combinations of four levels of N–P 2 O 5 –S inorganic fertilizers (0–0–0; 70–21–9; 112–37–16; and 159–58–25 kg ha −1 ) and four levels of fresh cattle manure (0, 5, 10, and 15 t ha −1 ) were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. Unlike that of NPS inorganic fertilizers application and its interaction with cattle manure, physicochemical properties of the experimental soil were highly significantly improved with cattle manure application. Most growth and bulb yield parameters of garlic were significantly influenced by combined applications of NPS inorganic fertilizers and cattle manure, and their responses were more pronounced with the progress of the cropping seasons. Combined applications of 112–37–16 kg ha −1 N–P 2 O 5 –S inorganic fertilizers with 15 and 10 t ha −1 cattle manure gave the highest bulb yields (18.03–22.05 t ha −1 ), net benefits (Ethiopian Birr 509,456–626,814 per hectare), and marginal rate of returns (1,492.35–2,005.15%) in both study years of 2017 and 2018. Hence, combined applications of 112–37–16 kg ha −1 N–P 2 O 5 –S inorganic fertilizers with 10–15 t ha −1 cattle manure are recommendable for garlic growing farmers in northwest Ethiopian highlands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure highly significantly improved soil physicochemical properties.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
cattle manure applicatione0
Outcome
physicochemical properties of the experimental soile0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“physicochemical properties of the experimental soil were highly significantly improved with cattle manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPS fertilizers and their manure interaction did not show the same soil improvement.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
NPS inorganic fertilizers applicatione0
Outcome
physicochemical properties of the experimental soile0
Comparator
cattle manure applicatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Unlike that of NPS inorganic fertilizers application and its interaction with cattle manure, physicochemical properties of the experimental soil were highly significantly improved with cattle manure application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPS fertilizer and manure significantly influenced most garlic growth parameters.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
combined applications of NPS inorganic fertilizers and cattle manuree0
Outcome
growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most growth and bulb yield parameters of garlic were significantly influenced by combined applications of NPS inorganic fertilizers and cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPS fertilizer and manure significantly influenced most bulb yield parameters.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
combined applications of NPS inorganic fertilizers and cattle manuree0
Outcome
bulb yield parameters of garlice0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most growth and bulb yield parameters of garlic were significantly influenced by combined applications of NPS inorganic fertilizers and cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield responses became more pronounced as cropping seasons progressed.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
responsese0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Setting
cropping seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their responses were more pronounced with the progress of the cropping seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer with 15 t/ha manure gave among the highest bulb yields, 18.03–22.05 t/ha.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
112–37–16 kg ha −1 N–P 2 O 5 –S inorganic fertilizers with 15 and 10 t ha −1 cattle manuree0
Outcome
bulb yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.03–22.05 t ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined applications of 112–37–16 kg ha −1 N–P 2 O 5 –S inorganic fertilizers with 15 and 10 t ha −1 cattle manure gave the highest bulb yields (18.03–22.05 t ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1413 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These combined applications gave net benefits of Ethiopian Birr 509,456–626,814 per hectare.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
net benefitse0
Value
Ethiopian Birr 509,456–626,814 per hectaree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net benefits (Ethiopian Birr 509,456–626,814 per hectare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These combined applications gave marginal returns of 1,492.35–2,005.15%.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
marginal rate of returnse0
Value
1,492.35–2,005.15%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“marginal rate of returns (1,492.35–2,005.15%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined 112–37–16 kg/ha NPS fertilizer and 10–15 t/ha manure for garlic farmers.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
112–37–16 kg ha −1 N–P 2 O 5 –S inorganic fertilizers with 10–15 t ha −1 cattle manuree0
Outcome
recommendable for garlic growing farmerse0
Setting
northwest Ethiopian highlandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined applications of 112–37–16 kg ha −1 N–P 2 O 5 –S inorganic fertilizers with 10–15 t ha −1 cattle manure are recommendable for garlic growing farmers in northwest Ethiopian highlands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1758 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic (Allium sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–112 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.