Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant Sciences

Growth and Yield Response of Improved Sweet Potato Cultivars to Intercropping with Hybrid Maize and Inorganic Fertilizers

Sylvester Katuromunda

17
claims
31
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field study was conducted in 2018 to determine the growth and yield response of improved sweet potato cultivars to intercropping with hybrid maize and inorganic fertilizer application using a randomized complete block design in a split-plot arrangement and three replications. Maize was intercropped with NASPOT 1, NASPOT 8 and NASPOT 11 potato cultivars. Sole crops and the potato/maize intercrops were fertilized with graded levels of N, P and K comprising a control without fertilizer, 40-20-30, 80-40-60, 120-60-90 and 160-80-120 kg/ha of N-P-K. Vine lengths, and numbers of vine branches and leaves of potato plants under intercropping were higher (P < .05) than those of plants under sole cropping system. In both systems, NPK fertilizer application didn’t (P >.05) affect the vine lengths and numbers of vine branches compared to the control. But numbers of vine branches of plants under sole cropping for all the fertilizer treatments were higher (P < .0001) than those of plants under intercropping system. Generally, NPK application in the sole potato cropping significantly (P =.02) affected the leaf numbers, and the fertilized potato plants had greater (P < .05) leaf numbers than the control. In both systems, NASPOT 11 produced the highest tuber yield, followed by NASPOT 8. Tuber yields were better (P < .01) under sole cropping (43.36 MT/ha) than under intercropping (33.35 MT/ha). Maize grain yields were also better (P < .0001) under sole cropping than under intercropping. But grain yields from all the fertilized intercrops were greater (P < .05) than those of their corresponding control treatments. In all the intercrops, the land equivalent ratios (LERs) were greater than unity indicating yield advantage of intercropping over sole cropping. It was concluded that applying 120-60-90 kg/ha of N-P-K into the potato/maize intercrops results in better tuber yields compared to the unfertilized control. Also, N-P-K application in quantities greater than 40-20-30 kg/ha does not lead to significant differences in tuber yields between the potato/maize intercropping and sole potato cropping systems indicating that inter-specific competition for nutrients in the intercrops is eliminated by the fertilizer. In addition, the application of 80-120 kg N/ha, 40-60 kg P/ha and 60-90 kg K/ha in the intercrops results in better intercrop performance as revealed by higher LERs indicating that improved potato cultivars and hybrid maize are compatible for intercropping. Therefore, farmers can intercrop improved sweet potato cultivars with hybrid maize and apply 120-60-90 kg/ha of N, P and K in the intercrops to maximize yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped sweet potato had longer vines and more leaves than sole sweet potato.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
Vine lengths, and numbers of vine branches and leavese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole cropping systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vine lengths, and numbers of vine branches and leaves of potato plants under intercropping were higher (P < .05) than those of plants under sole cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK did not significantly affect vine length or branch number in either system.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
NPK fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
vine lengths and numbers of vine branchese0
Direction
didn’te0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both systems, NPK fertilizer application didn’t (P >.05) affect the vine lengths and numbers of vine branches compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The abstract also reports more vine branches under sole cropping than intercropping for all fertiliser treatments.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
numbers of vine branchese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropping systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“numbers of vine branches of plants under sole cropping for all the fertilizer treatments were higher (P < .0001) than those of plants under intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK significantly affected sweet potato leaf number in sole cropping.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
NPK applicatione0
Outcome
leaf numberse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NPK application in the sole potato cropping significantly (P =.02) affected the leaf numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilised sole sweet potato had more leaves than the unfertilised control.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
fertilized potato plantse0
Outcome
leaf numberse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fertilized potato plants had greater (P < .05) leaf numbers than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NASPOT 11 had the highest tuber yield in both systems.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
NASPOT 11e0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both systems, NASPOT 11 produced the highest tuber yield, followed by NASPOT 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NASPOT 8 ranked second for tuber yield in both systems.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
NASPOT 8e0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
followed bye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both systems, NASPOT 11 produced the highest tuber yield, followed by NASPOT 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole sweet potato yielded 43.36 MT/ha versus 33.35 MT/ha intercropped.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
Tuber yieldse0
Direction
bettere0
Value
43.36 MT/hae0
Qualifier
33.35 MT/hae0
Comparator
intercroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuber yields were better (P < .01) under sole cropping (43.36 MT/ha) than under intercropping (33.35 MT/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1399 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole maize had greater grain yield than intercropped maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sole croppinge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
intercroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize grain yields were also better (P < .0001) under sole cropping than under intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilised intercrops had greater maize grain yields than corresponding controls.

Taxon
hybrid maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fertilized intercropse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
corresponding control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yields from all the fertilized intercrops were greater (P < .05) than those of their corresponding control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid maize”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All intercrops had land equivalent ratios above one.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
land equivalent ratios (LERs)e0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
unitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all the intercrops, the land equivalent ratios (LERs) were greater than unity indicating yield advantage of intercropping over sole cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1767 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude 120-60-90 kg/ha N-P-K improves intercropped tuber yield against no fertiliser.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
120-60-90 kg/ha of N-P-Ke0
Outcome
tuber yieldse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
unfertilized controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 120-60-90 kg/ha of N-P-K into the potato/maize intercrops results in better tuber yields compared to the unfertilized control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1791–1925 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Above 40-20-30 kg/ha N-P-K, intercropped and sole tuber yields did not significantly differ.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
N-P-K application in quantities greater than 40-20-30 kg/hae0
Outcome
tuber yieldse0
Direction
does not lead to significant differencese0
Comparator
sole potato cropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-P-K application in quantities greater than 40-20-30 kg/ha does not lead to significant differences in tuber yields between the potato/maize intercropping and sole potato cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1933–2121 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer fertiliser eliminates interspecific nutrient competition in intercrops.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
inter-specific competition for nutrients in the intercropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inter-specific competition for nutrients in the intercrops is eliminated by the fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2138–2228 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude the specified NPK range raises land equivalent ratios.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
80-120 kg N/ha, 40-60 kg P/ha and 60-90 kg K/hae0
Outcome
LERse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 80-120 kg N/ha, 40-60 kg P/ha and 60-90 kg K/ha in the intercrops results in better intercrop performance as revealed by higher LERs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2247–2394 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 38–50 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer sweet potato cultivars and hybrid maize are compatible for intercropping.

Outcome
compatible for intercroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved potato cultivars and hybrid maize are compatible for intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2411–2486 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend intercropping improved sweet potato with hybrid maize and 120-60-90 kg/ha NPK.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Outcome
intercrop improved sweet potato cultivars with hybrid maize and apply 120-60-90 kg/ha of N, P and K in the intercrops to maximize yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers can intercrop improved sweet potato cultivars with hybrid maize and apply 120-60-90 kg/ha of N, P and K in the intercrops to maximize yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2499–2647 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

24 papers: 13 positive, 11 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

63 papers: 53 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

intercropping · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.