Paper · 2020 · Journal of Crop Nutrition Science

Evaluation Effect of Chemical and Biological Fertilizer on Nitrogen Efficiency Indexes of Safflower Genotypes under Rain fed Condition

Abas Solymanifard

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of nutrients, especially nitrogen, in order to economic production, maintains sustainable agriculture, provide food security and prevent environmental pollution is considered to have an important priority. Also select and propose responsible genotype to environmental conditions is a great factor. OBJECTIVES: The current research was conducted to evaluate effect of Azotobacter and nitrogen fertilizer on Nitrogen consumption efficiency indices of some safflower genotypes under dry land conditions. METHODS: This research was conducted via combined analysis factorial experiment based on randomized complete blocks design with three replications along 2015-16 and 2016-17 year. The treatments included different level of Nitrogen (N0: nonuse of fertilizer or biofertilizer as control, N1: Seed inoculation with Azotobacter + nonuse of urea chemical fertilizer, N2: Seed inoculation with Azotobacter + 50% nitrogen from urea source, N3: 100% nitrogen from urea source according soil test) and 6 genotypes (G1: 312-S6-697, G2: PI-401478, G3: PI-253895, G4: PI-306974, G5: Padideh and G6: Sina). RESULT: Result of analysis of variance revealed effect of nitrogen factor and genotypes on all studied traits was significant. In this study combined application of 50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer with Azotobacter in terms of seed yield was not significantly different from the treatment of 100% nitrogen fertilizer application and the nitrogen use efficiency in this treatment was significantly higher than the application of 100% chemical fertilizer. CONCLUSION: Sina genotype and combined use of 50% nitrogen fertilizer with Azotobacter to produce maximum yield and reduce the use of nitrogen fertilizer in order to achieve sustainable agriculture and environmental protection in the dry land conditions and can be recommended to producers in studied region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatment and genotype significantly affected all studied safflower traits.

Outcome
all studied traitse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Result of analysis of variance revealed effect of nitrogen factor and genotypes on all studied traits was significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield with 50% nitrogen plus Azotobacter was not significantly different from 100% nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer with Azotobactere0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
100% nitrogen fertilizer applicatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of 50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer with Azotobacter in terms of seed yield was not significantly different from the treatment of 100% nitrogen fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency with 50% nitrogen plus Azotobacter was significantly higher than with 100% chemical fertilizer.

Treatment
50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer with Azotobactere1
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
100% chemical fertilizere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the nitrogen use efficiency in this treatment was significantly higher than the application of 100% chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1570 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of 50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer with Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1332 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Sina with 50% nitrogen fertilizer plus Azotobacter to maximize yield while reducing fertilizer use in dry land.

Material
Sinae0
Treatment
50% nitrogen fertilizer with Azotobactere0
Outcome
produce maximum yield and reduce the use of nitrogen fertilizere0
Setting
dry land conditionse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Sina genotype and combined use of 50% nitrogen fertilizer with Azotobacter to produce maximum yield and reduce the use of nitrogen fertilizer in order to achieve sustainable agriculture and environmental protection in the dry land conditions and can be recommended to producers in studied region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1879 · show in text ↑