Abstract
In trials with Pennisetum typhoides [= P. americanum] hybrid BJ-104 grown in the kharif [monsoon] seasons of 1976-9 and given combinations of 0-60 kg N, 0-30 kg P2O5 and 0-30 kg K2O/ha, av. grain yield was highest (2.3 t/ha) with 60 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 + 15 kg K2O/ha compared with 1.1 t without NPK. Crops showed a quadratic response to the total NPK units the max. being 90.87 kg N + 45.41 kg P2O5 + 27.27 kg K2O/ha and the min. 57.66 kg N + 28.83 kg P2O5 + 18.3 kg K2O/ha. The multiple regression fit of N, P and K with grain yield indicated that response/kg N, P2O5 and K2O was 13, 11.37 and 0.058 kg/ha, resp. The standard regression coeff. of these nutrients showed the contribution to yield of N, P and K was 59.51, 35.33 and 0.056%, resp.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield peaked at 2.3 t/ha under 60 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 + 15 kg K2O/ha versus 1.1 t without NPK.
- Taxon
- Pennisetum typhoides
Cenchrus americanuse0 - Material
- BJ-104e0
- Treatment
- 60 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 + 15 kg K2O/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.3 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1.1 te0
- Comparator
- without NPKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In trials with Pennisetum typhoides [= P. americanum] hybrid BJ-104 grown in the kharif [monsoon] seasons of 1976-9 and given combinations of 0-60 kg N, 0-30 kg P2O5 and 0-30 kg K2O/ha, av. grain yield was highest (2.3 t/ha) with 60 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 + 15 kg K2O/ha compared with 1.1 t without NPK.”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield showed a quadratic response to total NPK units.
- Taxon
- Pennisetum typhoides
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- total NPK unitse0
- Outcome
- quadratic responsee0
- Qualifier
- the max. being 90.87 kg N + 45.41 kg P2O5 + 27.27 kg K2O/ha and the min. 57.66 kg N + 28.83 kg P2O5 + 18.3 kg K2O/hae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Crops showed a quadratic response to the total NPK units the max. being 90.87 kg N + 45.41 kg P2O5 + 27.27 kg K2O/ha and the min. 57.66 kg N + 28.83 kg P2O5 + 18.3 kg K2O/ha.”
e1“Pennisetum typhoides”
Claim · model-written summary
Regression estimated yield response per kg N at 13 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- Pennisetum typhoides
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- Ne0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Value
- 13e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The multiple regression fit of N, P and K with grain yield indicated that response/kg N, P2O5 and K2O was 13, 11.37 and 0.058 kg/ha, resp.”
e1“Pennisetum typhoides”
Claim · model-written summary
Regression estimated yield response per kg P2O5 at 11.37 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- Pennisetum typhoides
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- P2O5e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Value
- 11.37e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The multiple regression fit of N, P and K with grain yield indicated that response/kg N, P2O5 and K2O was 13, 11.37 and 0.058 kg/ha, resp.”
e1“Pennisetum typhoides”
Claim · model-written summary
Regression estimated yield response per kg K2O at 0.058 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- Pennisetum typhoides
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- K2Oe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Value
- 0.058 kg/hae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The multiple regression fit of N, P and K with grain yield indicated that response/kg N, P2O5 and K2O was 13, 11.37 and 0.058 kg/ha, resp.”
e1“Pennisetum typhoides”
Claim · model-written summary
Standardized regression assigned N a 59.51% contribution to yield.
- Taxon
- Pennisetum typhoides
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- Ne0
- Outcome
- contribution to yielde0
- Value
- 59.51e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The standard regression coeff. of these nutrients showed the contribution to yield of N, P and K was 59.51, 35.33 and 0.056%, resp.”
e1“Pennisetum typhoides”
Claim · model-written summary
Standardized regression assigned P a 35.33% contribution to yield.
- Taxon
- Pennisetum typhoides
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- Pe0
- Outcome
- contribution to yielde0
- Value
- 35.33e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The standard regression coeff. of these nutrients showed the contribution to yield of N, P and K was 59.51, 35.33 and 0.056%, resp.”
e1“Pennisetum typhoides”
Claim · model-written summary
Standardized regression assigned K a 0.056% contribution to yield.
- Taxon
- Pennisetum typhoides
Cenchrus americanuse1 - Treatment
- Ke0
- Outcome
- contribution to yielde0
- Value
- 0.056%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The standard regression coeff. of these nutrients showed the contribution to yield of N, P and K was 59.51, 35.33 and 0.056%, resp.”
e1“Pennisetum typhoides”
The same questions in other papers
potassium · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →phosphorus · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.