Paper · 1990 · Weed Technology

Performance of Imazethapyr on Pulse Crops

Najib Malik; Lawrence Townley-Smith

14
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The potential of imazethapyr as a selective herbicide in four pulse crops was investigated at Melfort, Saskatchewan in 1988 and 1989. Lentil, field pea, faba bean and annual vetch were tolerant to imazethapyr applied preemergence to a silty clay loam soil at 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 kg ai ha -1 . Postemergence treatments above 0.05 kg ha -1 , however, stunted lentil and vetch in both years. Environmental factors, the dominant weed in the experimental site, as well as timing of application strongly influenced the performance of imazethapyr. Seed yield increases observed with imazethapyr treatments, compared to metribuzin or untreated check, were greater in 1989 when wild oat was the dominant weed and moisture was not a limiting factor in the early stages of crop development, than in 1988 when field pennycress was the dominant weed. Mean seed yield for all imazethapyr treatments, compared to the check, increased 0 and 930%, 24 and 89%, 21 and 600%, and 47 and 44% in 1988 and 1989, for lentil, field pea, faba bean and vetch, respectively. Significant increases in lentil seed density, seed size, and germination were also obtained though protein content decreased 2%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil was tolerant to preemergence imazethapyr.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
imazethapyr applied preemergencee1
Outcome
tolerante1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lentil, field pea, faba bean and annual vetch were tolerant to imazethapyr applied preemergence to a silty clay loam soil at 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 kg ai ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field pea was tolerant to preemergence imazethapyr.

Taxon
field peae1
Treatment
imazethapyr applied preemergencee1
Outcome
tolerante1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Lentil, field pea, faba bean and annual vetch were tolerant to imazethapyr applied preemergence to a silty clay loam soil at 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 kg ai ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean was tolerant to preemergence imazethapyr.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Treatment
imazethapyr applied preemergencee1
Outcome
tolerante1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Lentil, field pea, faba bean and annual vetch were tolerant to imazethapyr applied preemergence to a silty clay loam soil at 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 kg ai ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual vetch was tolerant to preemergence imazethapyr.

Taxon
annual vetche1
Treatment
imazethapyr applied preemergencee1
Outcome
tolerante1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Lentil, field pea, faba bean and annual vetch were tolerant to imazethapyr applied preemergence to a silty clay loam soil at 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, and 0.20 kg ai ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence imazethapyr above 0.05 kg ha-1 stunted lentil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise2
Treatment
Postemergence treatments above 0.05 kg ha -1e2
Outcome
stuntede2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Postemergence treatments above 0.05 kg ha -1 , however, stunted lentil and vetch in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence imazethapyr above 0.05 kg ha-1 stunted vetch.

Taxon
vetche2
Treatment
Postemergence treatments above 0.05 kg ha -1e2
Outcome
stuntede2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e2

“Postemergence treatments above 0.05 kg ha -1 , however, stunted lentil and vetch in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr seed yield increases over metribuzin or the untreated check were greater in 1989, with wild oat dominant, than in 1988, with field pennycress dominant.

Taxon
Pulse Cropst0
Treatment
imazethapyr treatmentse3
Interactor
wild oate3weed
Second interactor
field pennycressThlaspi arvensee3weed
Outcome
Seed yield increasese3
Direction
greatere3
Qualifier
than in 1988e3
Comparator
metribuzin or untreated checke3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thlaspi arvense
Thlaspi arvense · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Imazethapyr on Pulse Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–41 · show in text ↑
e3

“Seed yield increases observed with imazethapyr treatments, compared to metribuzin or untreated check, were greater in 1989 when wild oat was the dominant weed and moisture was not a limiting factor in the early stages of crop development, than in 1988 when field pennycress was the dominant weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr increased mean seed yield of lentil by 0% in 1988 and 930% in 1989 over the check.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise4
Treatment
imazethapyr treatmentse4
Outcome
Mean seed yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
0 and 930%e4
Qualifier
in 1988 and 1989e4
Comparator
the checke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Mean seed yield for all imazethapyr treatments, compared to the check, increased 0 and 930%, 24 and 89%, 21 and 600%, and 47 and 44% in 1988 and 1989, for lentil, field pea, faba bean and vetch, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr increased mean seed yield of field pea by 24% in 1988 and 89% in 1989 over the check.

Taxon
field peae4
Treatment
imazethapyr treatmentse4
Outcome
Mean seed yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
24 and 89%e4
Qualifier
in 1988 and 1989e4
Comparator
the checke4

Verbatim

e4

“Mean seed yield for all imazethapyr treatments, compared to the check, increased 0 and 930%, 24 and 89%, 21 and 600%, and 47 and 44% in 1988 and 1989, for lentil, field pea, faba bean and vetch, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr increased mean seed yield of faba bean by 21% in 1988 and 600% in 1989 over the check.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae4
Treatment
imazethapyr treatmentse4
Outcome
Mean seed yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
21 and 600%e4
Qualifier
in 1988 and 1989e4
Comparator
the checke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Mean seed yield for all imazethapyr treatments, compared to the check, increased 0 and 930%, 24 and 89%, 21 and 600%, and 47 and 44% in 1988 and 1989, for lentil, field pea, faba bean and vetch, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr increased mean seed yield of vetch by 47% in 1988 and 44% in 1989 over the check.

Taxon
vetche4
Treatment
imazethapyr treatmentse4
Outcome
Mean seed yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
47 and 44%e4
Qualifier
in 1988 and 1989e4
Comparator
the checke4

Verbatim

e4

“Mean seed yield for all imazethapyr treatments, compared to the check, increased 0 and 930%, 24 and 89%, 21 and 600%, and 47 and 44% in 1988 and 1989, for lentil, field pea, faba bean and vetch, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr significantly increased lentil seed density, seed size and germination over the check.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise5
Treatment
imazethapyr treatmentse4
Outcome
seed density, seed size, and germinatione5
Direction
increasese5
Comparator
the checke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Significant increases in lentil seed density, seed size, and germination were also obtained though protein content decreased 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1181 · show in text ↑
e4

“Mean seed yield for all imazethapyr treatments, compared to the check, increased 0 and 930%, 24 and 89%, 21 and 600%, and 47 and 44% in 1988 and 1989, for lentil, field pea, faba bean and vetch, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr treatments decreased lentil protein content by 2%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise5
Treatment
imazethapyr treatmentse4
Outcome
protein contente5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
2%e5
Comparator
the checke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Significant increases in lentil seed density, seed size, and germination were also obtained though protein content decreased 2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1181 · show in text ↑
e4

“Mean seed yield for all imazethapyr treatments, compared to the check, increased 0 and 930%, 24 and 89%, 21 and 600%, and 47 and 44% in 1988 and 1989, for lentil, field pea, faba bean and vetch, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1052 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental factors, the dominant weed and timing of application strongly influenced the performance of imazethapyr in pulse crops.

Taxon
Pulse Cropst0
Treatment
timing of applicatione6
Interactor
dominant weede6weed
Outcome
performance of imazethapyre6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of Imazethapyr on Pulse Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–41 · show in text ↑
e6

“Environmental factors, the dominant weed in the experimental site, as well as timing of application strongly influenced the performance of imazethapyr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–546 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · disease · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.