Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Late imazethapyr/imazamox application raised lentil grain yield 30% over early application.

A claim from Herbicide Choice and Timing for Weed Control in Imidazolinone-Resistant Lentil · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late imazethapyr/imazamox application raised lentil grain yield 30% over early application.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
imazethapyr/imazamoxe0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
30%e0
Comparator
early application of these herbicidese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late applications of imazethapyr/imazamox or imazamox resulted in grain yields 30% higher than with early application of these herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1333
t0

“lentil”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 72–78

Title

Herbicide Choice and Timing for Weed Control in Imidazolinone-Resistant Lentil

L. K. Fedoruk; S. J. Shirtliffe Weed Technology 2011. doi:10.1614/wt-d-11-00079.1

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-2cbfffd4b61c16cf81b59f2ad87d94d750fa6b0416021ee49e2a4448f5cf5e60 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Imazethapyr · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

imazamox · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.