Paper · 2021 · Planta Medica

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of 60 Labiatae species, growing in Greece, regarding the content of selected abietane-type diterpenes using 1H-qNMR.

P Kallimanis; P. Magiatis; Tsiaka Th; et al.

16
claims
25
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Carnosic acid (CA) and carnosol (CS) are abietane-type diterpenes with plenty of biologic properties [1] [2]. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of 60 plant species of Lamiaceae, growing in Greece, regarding their content in CA, 12-methoxy-carnosic acid (12MΟCA), CS and 7-methoxy-epirosmanol (7MER) using 1H-qNMR is presented.The methanolic extracts from leaves of species: Ballota, Hyssopus, Lavandula, Marubium, Nepeta, Phlomis, Ocimum, Origanum, Rosmarinus, Salvia, Stachys, Coridothymus, Mentha, Melissa, Sideritis, Satureja, Teucrium, Lamium and Betonica, were analysed using as standards the isolated and fully structurally characterized metabolites by our group. At least one of the target compounds was detected in 29 species: Rosmarinus (2), Salvia (23), Melissa, Ocimum, Mentha (2). 7MER has not been determined in any of the extracts. All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2). The richest source in CA was S. pomifera subsp. pomifera (Cretan sage) (21.6±0.6 mg/g dry leaves)>S. fruticosa (Greek sage) (12.5±1.6 mg/g)>S. officinalis L. (Common sage) (11.7±4.3 mg/g), in CS was S. officinalis (1.1±0.4 mg/g)>R. officinalis L. (1.1±0.1 mg/g)>S. canariensis (1.1±0.3 mg/g) while in 12OMCA was S. microphylla (10.7±3.3 mg/g)>S. officinalis (6.1±2.3 mg/g)>S. fruticosa (3.1±0.3 mg/g). Salvia and Rosemary revealed as best sources for CA, CS and 12MOCA among the studied species. 1H-qNMR spectroscopy offers a useful tool for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the examined compounds in complex extracts, in a simple, rapid and direct way without sample deterioration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At least one target compound was detected in 29 species.

Outcome
target compoundse0
Value
29 speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“At least one of the target compounds was detected in 29 species: Rosmarinus (2), Salvia (23), Melissa, Ocimum, Mentha (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–798 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

7MER was not detected in the extracts.

Outcome
7MER has not been determinede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“7MER has not been determined in any of the extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–851 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CA, CS and 12OMCA occurred together in nine Salvia species.

Taxon
SalviaSalviae0
Outcome
CA, CS and 12OMCAe0
Value
9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia
Salvia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rob Hille · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CA, CS and 12OMCA occurred together in two Rosmarinus species.

Outcome
CA, CS and 12OMCAe0
Value
2e0

Verbatim

e0

“All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. pomifera subsp. pomifera had the highest reported CA content.

Taxon
S. pomifera subsp. pomiferaSalvia pomiferae0
Outcome
CAe1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
21.6±0.6 mg/g dry leavese0
Comparator
S. fruticosae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia pomifera
Salvia pomifera · TaxonC T Johansson · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. pomifera subsp. pomifera (Cretan sage) (21.6±0.6 mg/g dry leaves)>S. fruticosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. fruticosa had 12.5±1.6 mg/g CA.

Taxon
S. fruticosaSalvia fruticosae0
Outcome
CAe1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
12.5±1.6 mg/ge0
Comparator
S. officinalis L.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia fruticosa
Salvia fruticosa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNasserHalaweh · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. fruticosa (Greek sage) (12.5±1.6 mg/g)>S. officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. officinalis L. had 11.7±4.3 mg/g CA.

Taxon
S. officinalis L.e0
Outcome
CAe1
Value
11.7±4.3 mg/ge0

Verbatim

e0

“S. officinalis L. (Common sage) (11.7±4.3 mg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1123 · show in text ↑
e1

“All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. officinalis had 1.1±0.4 mg/g CS.

Taxon
S. officinalise0
Outcome
CSe1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.1±0.4 mg/ge0
Comparator
R. officinalis L.e0

Verbatim

e0

“S. officinalis (1.1±0.4 mg/g)>R. officinalis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1182 · show in text ↑
e1

“All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. officinalis L. had 1.1±0.1 mg/g CS.

Taxon
R. officinalis L.Salvia rosmarinuse0
Outcome
CSe1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.1±0.1 mg/ge0
Comparator
S. canariensise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R. officinalis L. (1.1±0.1 mg/g)>S. canariensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. canariensis had 1.1±0.3 mg/g CS.

Taxon
S. canariensise0
Outcome
CSe1
Value
1.1±0.3 mg/ge0

Verbatim

e0

“S. canariensis (1.1±0.3 mg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. microphylla had 10.7±3.3 mg/g 12OMCA.

Taxon
S. microphyllaSalvia microphyllae0
Outcome
12OMCAe1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
10.7±3.3 mg/ge0
Comparator
S. officinalise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia microphylla
Salvia microphylla · TaxonDave Whitinger · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. microphylla (10.7±3.3 mg/g)>S. officinalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1293 · show in text ↑
e1

“All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. officinalis had 6.1±2.3 mg/g 12OMCA.

Taxon
S. officinalise0
Outcome
12OMCAe1
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
6.1±2.3 mg/ge0
Comparator
S. fruticosae0

Verbatim

e0

“S. officinalis (6.1±2.3 mg/g)>S. fruticosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. fruticosa had 3.1±0.3 mg/g 12OMCA.

Taxon
S. fruticosaSalvia fruticosae0
Outcome
12OMCAe1
Value
3.1±0.3 mg/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia fruticosa
Salvia fruticosa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNasserHalaweh · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. fruticosa (3.1±0.3 mg/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1336 · show in text ↑
e1

“All three CA, CS and 12OMCA, were identified only in Salvia (9) and Rosmarinus (2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salvia was among the best sources of the three compounds.

Taxon
SalviaSalviae0
Outcome
best sources for CA, CS and 12MOCAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia
Salvia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rob Hille · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salvia and Rosemary revealed as best sources for CA, CS and 12MOCA among the studied species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1431 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rosemary was among the best sources of the three compounds.

Taxon
RosemarySalvia rosmarinuse0
Outcome
best sources for CA, CS and 12MOCAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salvia rosmarinus
Salvia rosmarinus · TaxonMargalob · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salvia and Rosemary revealed as best sources for CA, CS and 12MOCA among the studied species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1431 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1H-qNMR provided simple, rapid and direct compound analysis.

Outcome
quantitative and qualitative analysise0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“1H-qNMR spectroscopy offers a useful tool for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the examined compounds in complex extracts, in a simple, rapid and direct way without sample deterioration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1630 · show in text ↑