Paper · 2021 · PROCEEDINGS of Nizhnevolzhskiy agrouniversity complex science and higher vocational education

REDUCTION OF WATER LOAD ON RICE AGROCENOSIS DURING DRIP IRRIGATION

K Rodin; E Vorontsova; L Ionova; et al.

17
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Introduction. In the Russian Federation, rice is not one of the main food crops. But the Institute of Nutrition of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the recommended annual consumption rate of cereals per inhabitant should not be less than 6 kg. Hence, every year the required amount of raw rice in the country should be determined in the amount of 1.5 million tons. In 2020, a little more than 1.2 million tons of raw rice were produced, which is 26% lower than the demand. At the same time, irrigation water is spent on 1 ha of crops from 12 to 25 thousand m 3 /ha and more. Based on this, this is the most water-intensive crop that is cultivated on irrigated land. The recent shortage of fresh water leads to the need to search for new water-saving ecologically tolerant technologies for irrigation of rice. The search for a solution to this problem was based on the scientific hypothesis that rice belongs to the bluegrass family, the full development cycle of which proceeds not as an anaerobic, but an aerobic plant that forms root hairs and uses soil moisture for its water supply. Object. We studied the reaction rates of the early ripening rice cultivar Volgogradsky to the water and food regimes of the soil. The purpose of the research was to substantiate the possibility of rice cultivation during drip irrigation, different soil water regimes and fertilizer application rates, which will provide 5, 6 and 7 t / ha of grain. Materials and methods. The scheme included a two-factor experiment. The first factor: 1 -permissible decrease in the moisture content of the active layer (0.6m) of the soil 80% of the lowest moisture capacity; 2 -until the end of the tillering phase of rice according to option 1 in a layer of 0.4 m, followed by an increase in the layer to 0.6 m; 3 -water regime according to the 2 option until the beginning of the wax ripeness of the grain, followed by a decrease in the pre-irrigation moisture content to 70% of the lowest moisture capacity. The second factor of the fertilizer application dose; B 1 for obtaining a yield of 5 t / ha of grain (N 95 P 62 K 75 ); B 2 -6 t / ha (N 114 P 74 K 90 ) and B 3 -7 t / ha (N 137 90 108 ). The studies were accompanied by observations, counts and measurements carried out in compliance with the requirements of experimental techniques. Results and conclusions. Studies have established that the maximum leaf area, 36.78 thousand m2 / ha, was formed in the variant of the water regime 100-80% of the lowest moisture capacity, h = 0.4 and 0.6 m (A 2 ), which is 3.3 and 1% more than in options 100-80% of the lowest moisture capacity, h = 0.6 m ( 2 ) and 100-80% HB, h = 0.4 and 0.6 m ( 2 ). The application of mineral fertilizers, N 95 P 62 K 75 (5 t / ha -B 1 ), N 114 P 74 K 90 (6 t / ha -B 2 ) and N 137 90 108 (7 t / ha -B 3 ), also had a stimulating effect on the main indicators of photosynthetic activity of plants. It was also determined that the planned yield at the level of 5 t / ha can be obtained on all variants of the water regime of the soil when applied with B 1 . But with a combination of 3 + B 2 , calculated per ton of grain, the volume of water supplied to the rice field was the smallest. The yield of 6 t / ha of grain was obtained in all the studied variants of the water regime, but against the background of a higher dose of B 2 fertilizers. Here, the most preferred combination was 3 + B 2 . Of all the studied factors, the minimum deviation of 0.71% from the planned level of 7 t / ha was obtained with a combination of 2 + B 3 . But the combination 3 + B 3 , which is less expensive per ton of grain and the cost of irrigation water (716 m 3 ). The calculation for economic efficiency showed that in all three variants of the water regime against the background of the introduction of B 1 , the yield was formed at the level of 5.0 t / ha with a profitability of 57.3 -92.6%. The introduction of B 2 , calculated to obtain 6.0 t / ha, contributed to its increase to 81.9 -92.6%, B 3 -7 t / ha to 104.1 -116.5%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water regime A2 produced the maximum rice leaf area of 36.78 thousand m2/ha.

Treatment
water regime 100-80% of the lowest moisture capacity, h = 0.4 and 0.6 m (A 2 )e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
36.78 thousand m2 / hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum leaf area, 36.78 thousand m2 / ha, was formed in the variant of the water regime 100-80% of the lowest moisture capacity, h = 0.4 and 0.6 m (A 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2370–2528 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A2 leaf area exceeded one comparison regime by 3.3%.

Treatment
water regime 100-80% of the lowest moisture capacity, h = 0.4 and 0.6 m (A 2 )e1
Outcome
leaf areae1
Direction
moree0
Value
3.3e0
Comparator
100-80% of the lowest moisture capacity, h = 0.6 m ( 2 )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which is 3.3 and 1% more than in options 100-80% of the lowest moisture capacity, h = 0.6 m ( 2 ) and 100-80% HB, h = 0.4 and 0.6 m ( 2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2530–2668 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum leaf area, 36.78 thousand m2 / ha, was formed in the variant of the water regime 100-80% of the lowest moisture capacity, h = 0.4 and 0.6 m (A 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2370–2528 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A2 leaf area exceeded another comparison regime by 1%.

Treatment
water regime 100-80% of the lowest moisture capacity, h = 0.4 and 0.6 m (A 2 )e1
Outcome
leaf areae1
Direction
moree0
Value
1%e0
Comparator
100-80% HB, h = 0.4 and 0.6 m ( 2 )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which is 3.3 and 1% more than in options 100-80% of the lowest moisture capacity, h = 0.6 m ( 2 ) and 100-80% HB, h = 0.4 and 0.6 m ( 2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2530–2668 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum leaf area, 36.78 thousand m2 / ha, was formed in the variant of the water regime 100-80% of the lowest moisture capacity, h = 0.4 and 0.6 m (A 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2370–2528 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 95 P 62 K 75 stimulated the main indicators of rice photosynthetic activity.

Treatment
N 95 P 62 K 75e0
Outcome
main indicators of photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
stimulatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of mineral fertilizers, N 95 P 62 K 75 (5 t / ha -B 1 ), N 114 P 74 K 90 (6 t / ha -B 2 ) and N 137 90 108 (7 t / ha -B 3 ), also had a stimulating effect on the main indicators of photosynthetic activity of plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2669–2900 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 114 P 74 K 90 stimulated the main indicators of rice photosynthetic activity.

Treatment
N 114 P 74 K 90e0
Outcome
main indicators of photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
stimulatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of mineral fertilizers, N 95 P 62 K 75 (5 t / ha -B 1 ), N 114 P 74 K 90 (6 t / ha -B 2 ) and N 137 90 108 (7 t / ha -B 3 ), also had a stimulating effect on the main indicators of photosynthetic activity of plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2669–2900 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 137 90 108 stimulated the main indicators of rice photosynthetic activity.

Treatment
N 137 90 108e0
Outcome
main indicators of photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
stimulatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of mineral fertilizers, N 95 P 62 K 75 (5 t / ha -B 1 ), N 114 P 74 K 90 (6 t / ha -B 2 ) and N 137 90 108 (7 t / ha -B 3 ), also had a stimulating effect on the main indicators of photosynthetic activity of plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2669–2900 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B1 fertilizer achieved planned rice yield of 5 t/ha across all water regimes.

Treatment
B 1e0
Outcome
planned yielde0
Value
5 t / hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the planned yield at the level of 5 t / ha can be obtained on all variants of the water regime of the soil when applied with B 1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2929–3059 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regime 3 with B2 minimized water supplied per ton of rice grain.

Treatment
3 + B 2e0
Outcome
volume of water supplied to the rice fielde0
Direction
smalleste0
Qualifier
calculated per ton of graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a combination of 3 + B 2 , calculated per ton of grain, the volume of water supplied to the rice field was the smallest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3064–3189 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B2 fertilizer achieved rice grain yield of 6 t/ha across all water regimes.

Treatment
B 2 fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
6 t / hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of 6 t / ha of grain was obtained in all the studied variants of the water regime, but against the background of a higher dose of B 2 fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3190–3346 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For 6 t/ha grain yield, the authors preferred combination 3 + B2.

Outcome
most preferred combination was 3 + B 2e0
Qualifier
6 t / ha of graine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Here, the most preferred combination was 3 + B 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3347–3397 · show in text ↑
e1

“The yield of 6 t / ha of grain was obtained in all the studied variants of the water regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3190–3281 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combination 2 + B3 produced the smallest deviation, 0.71%, from the planned 7 t/ha yield.

Treatment
2 + B 3e0
Outcome
deviatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
0.71%e0
Qualifier
planned level of 7 t / hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum deviation of 0.71% from the planned level of 7 t / ha was obtained with a combination of 2 + B 3 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3426–3536 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combination 3 + B3 was less expensive per ton of rice grain.

Treatment
3 + B 3e0
Outcome
expensive per ton of graine0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination 3 + B 3 , which is less expensive per ton of grain and the cost of irrigation water (716 m 3 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3541–3652 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combination 3 + B3 required 716 m3 irrigation water.

Treatment
3 + B 3e0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Value
716 m 3e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination 3 + B 3 , which is less expensive per ton of grain and the cost of irrigation water (716 m 3 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3541–3652 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B1 fertilizer achieved 5.0 t/ha yield in all three water regimes.

Treatment
B 1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
5.0 t / hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in all three variants of the water regime against the background of the introduction of B 1 , the yield was formed at the level of 5.0 t / ha with a profitability of 57.3 -92.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3705–3883 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B1 fertilizer gave 57.3–92.6% profitability across three water regimes.

Treatment
B 1e0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Value
57.3 -92.6%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in all three variants of the water regime against the background of the introduction of B 1 , the yield was formed at the level of 5.0 t / ha with a profitability of 57.3 -92.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3705–3883 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B2 fertilizer raised profitability to 81.9–92.6%.

Treatment
B 2e0
Outcome
profitabilitye1
Direction
increasee0
Value
81.9 -92.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The introduction of B 2 , calculated to obtain 6.0 t / ha, contributed to its increase to 81.9 -92.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3884–3985 · show in text ↑
e1

“with a profitability of 57.3 -92.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3847–3883 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B3 fertilizer raised profitability to 104.1–116.5%.

Treatment
B 3e0
Outcome
profitabilitye2
Direction
increasee1
Value
104.1 -116.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B 3 -7 t / ha to 104.1 -116.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3987–4018 · show in text ↑
e1

“The introduction of B 2 , calculated to obtain 6.0 t / ha, contributed to its increase to 81.9 -92.6%, B 3 -7 t / ha to 104.1 -116.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3884–4018 · show in text ↑
e2

“with a profitability of 57.3 -92.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3847–3883 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.