Paper · 2022 · BIO Web of Conferences

Prospects for the ExpressSun™ production system for sunflower cultivation in the European part of Russia

Oleg Goryanina; Sergey Zudilinb; Baurzhan Dzhangabaeva

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The results of studies of five sunflower cultivation variants within the production system ExpressSun™ on ordinary chernozem for 2013-2019 in the southeastern European part of Russia (the hydrothermal index for the growing season – hereinafter HTI – is 0.70) are presented. It was found that when switching to the systemic principle of formation, cultivation technologies based on differentiated soil tillage in crop rotation provided an increase in soil productive moisture reserve to the emergence of sunflower seedlings, in comparison with the traditional technology by 5.8-12.2 mm (3.8-8.0%), P 2 O 5 content - by 2.0-27.2 mg/kg (1.0-8.9%). The highest sunflower oilseed productivity 2.52-2.56 t/ha was revealed when using complex fertilizers, which was 0.25-0.43 t/ha (11.0-20.2%) more than other options. Despite the very high content of K2O in the soil, the yield was in direct proportion to this macroelement (r = 0.32-0.85*). The highest conditional net income 27070.2 rubles/ha was established against an intensive background of resourse-saving technology, which was 970.0-3780.5 rubles/ha (3.7-16.2%) more than other studied options. Based on the data obtained, a low-cost technology of sunflower cultivation has been developed, which includes the following technological operations: applying complex mineral fertilizers (NPK) 15 , deep soil tillage by 25-27 cm, spring harrowing, pre-sowing cultivation, packing, sowing, harrowing in one track, herbicide treatment, and top-dressing. The expected annual economic effect from the development of new technologies for sunflower cultivation is more than 1100 rubles/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differentiated tillage increased soil productive moisture before sunflower emergence by 5.8-12.2 mm relative to traditional technology.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
differentiated soil tillage in crop rotatione0
Outcome
soil productive moisture reservee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.8-12.2 mme0
Comparator
traditional technologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“cultivation technologies based on differentiated soil tillage in crop rotation provided an increase in soil productive moisture reserve to the emergence of sunflower seedlings, in comparison with the traditional technology by 5.8-12.2 mm (3.8-8.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differentiated tillage increased soil P 2 O 5 content by 2.0-27.2 mg/kg relative to traditional technology.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
differentiated soil tillage in crop rotatione0
Outcome
P 2 O 5 contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.0-27.2 mg/kge0
Comparator
traditional technologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“cultivation technologies based on differentiated soil tillage in crop rotation provided an increase in soil productive moisture reserve to the emergence of sunflower seedlings, in comparison with the traditional technology by 5.8-12.2 mm (3.8-8.0%), P 2 O 5 content - by 2.0-27.2 mg/kg (1.0-8.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complex fertilizers produced the highest sunflower oilseed productivity, 2.52-2.56 t/ha, exceeding other options by 0.25-0.43 t/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
complex fertilizerse0
Outcome
sunflower oilseed productivitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.52-2.56 t/hae0
Qualifier
0.25-0.43 t/ha (11.0-20.2%) moree0
Comparator
other optionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest sunflower oilseed productivity 2.52-2.56 t/ha was revealed when using complex fertilizers, which was 0.25-0.43 t/ha (11.0-20.2%) more than other options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–809 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower yield was directly proportional to soil K2O content.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Compound
K2Oe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
direct proportione0
Value
r = 0.32-0.85*e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Despite the very high content of K2O in the soil, the yield was in direct proportion to this macroelement (r = 0.32-0.85*)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive resource-saving technology produced the highest conditional net income, 27070.2 rubles/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
intensive background of resourse-saving technologye0
Outcome
conditional net incomee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
27070.2 rubles/hae0
Qualifier
970.0-3780.5 rubles/ha (3.7-16.2%) moree0
Comparator
other studied optionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest conditional net income 27070.2 rubles/ha was established against an intensive background of resourse-saving technology, which was 970.0-3780.5 rubles/ha (3.7-16.2%) more than other studied options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1143 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors developed a low-cost sunflower cultivation technology including complex mineral fertilizers and deep soil tillage.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
applying complex mineral fertilizers (NPK) 15e0
Outcome
low-cost technology of sunflower cultivatione0
Value
25-27 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“a low-cost technology of sunflower cultivation has been developed, which includes the following technological operations: applying complex mineral fertilizers (NPK) 15 , deep soil tillage by 25-27 cm, spring harrowing, pre-sowing cultivation, packing, sowing, harrowing in one track, herbicide treatment, and top-dressing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1494 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The projected annual economic effect of new sunflower cultivation technologies exceeds 1100 rubles/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
annual economic effecte0
Direction
more thane0
Value
1100 rubles/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The expected annual economic effect from the development of new technologies for sunflower cultivation is more than 1100 rubles/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1626 · show in text ↑

rotation · molecular: metabolites · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

365 papers: 344 positive, 21 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

361 papers more in this group

See all 365 papers →

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.