Paper · 2000 · Soil Science

EFFECTS OF SUNFLOWER ON SOIL QUALITY INDICATORS AND SUBSEQUENT WHEAT YIELD

R. A. Bowman; D. C. Nielsen; M. F. Vigil; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) production has increased in the central Great Plains, but little is known regarding how this crop will affect surface biomass production, various soil quality indicators, and subsequent winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yields. We hypothesized that sunflower production was reducing soil quality relative to other summer crops because of the need for tillage to incorporate herbicide, thus reducing surface residue. Our objectives were to quantify on a Weld silt loam (fine, smectitic, mesic, Aridic Argiustolls) surface crop residue levels immediately after seeding wheat, subsequent wheat grain yield, soil organic carbon (SOC), particulate organic matter-carbon (POM-C), aggregate stability, and texture in 3- or 4-year rotation. A randomized complete block design with three replications was used to compare rotations both with and without sunflower. Our data showed 13% lower SOC content and 26% lower POM-C content at the 0- to 5-cm depth in rotations with sunflower versus those without. At the 5- to 15- cm depths, differences were not significant (P < 0.05). Crop residue by mass was 5 times lower and wheat yields 33% lower in rotations with sunflower, but no differences were measured for wind erodible aggregates or texture. Tillage to incorporate herbicides for sunflower and low amounts of residue after sunflower in the 3-year rotation contributed to reduced SOC and POM-C, decreased residue at wheat planting, and reduced wheat yield. If sunflower is to be included in the central Great Plains, efforts should be made to use no-till production practices and 4-year rotations with corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower rotations had 13% lower soil organic carbon at 0 to 5 cm.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
rotations with sunflowere0
Outcome
SOC contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
13%e0
Qualifier
0- to 5-cm depthe0
Comparator
those withoute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13% lower SOC content and 26% lower POM-C content at the 0- to 5-cm depth in rotations with sunflower versus those without”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower rotations had 26% lower particulate organic matter carbon at 0 to 5 cm.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
rotations with sunflowere0
Outcome
POM-C contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
26%e0
Qualifier
0- to 5-cm depthe0
Comparator
those withoute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13% lower SOC content and 26% lower POM-C content at the 0- to 5-cm depth in rotations with sunflower versus those without”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil carbon differences at 5 to 15 cm were not significant.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
differencese0
Qualifier
5- to 15- cm depthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 5- to 15- cm depths, differences were not significant (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop residue mass was five times lower in sunflower rotations.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
rotations with sunflowere0
Outcome
Crop residue by masse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
5 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop residue by mass was 5 times lower and wheat yields 33% lower in rotations with sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was 33% lower in rotations with sunflower.

Treatment
rotations with sunflowere0
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop residue by mass was 5 times lower and wheat yields 33% lower in rotations with sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1195 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend no till practices and four year rotations with corn when sunflower is included in the central Great Plains.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
use no-till production practices and 4-year rotations with corne0
Setting
central Great Plainst1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efforts should be made to use no-till production practices and 4-year rotations with corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1634 · show in text ↑
t0

“If sunflower is to be included”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1515 · show in text ↑
t1

“in the central Great Plains, efforts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1552 · show in text ↑

rotation · molecular: metabolites · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.