Abstract
Introduction. The use of new water-soluble fertilizers in chelated form has not yet become widespread due to their poor knowledge. In this regard, the study of the effect of these drugs on the passage of the main processes of life of grapes in the arid conditions of th e North-Western Caspian region is relevant. Object. The object of research was table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat) grown on light chestnut soils of the Vineyard of the Federal Public Budget Scientific Institution Precaspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences Astrakhan Region, Russia. Materials and methods. The purpose of the research is to study economically valuable characteristics of table grape varieties depending on foliar nutrition with Plantafol and Boroplus fertilizers in irrigated conditions of the North-Western Caspian region. The analysis of meteorological conditions was carried out according to the data of the meteorological station with. Black Yar. The evaporation rate of soil moisture was calculated using the formula of N.N. Ivanova. The actual water consumption for the production of 1 ton of grapes was estimated by the coefficient of water consumption. Results and conclusion. The efficiency of irrigation water use increases from control to joint application of foliar dressings in all three varieties. This pattern can be traced over the years and on average over three years. The water consumption coefficient in the control was: for the Kodryanka variety 783.6 m3/ t, for the Rizamat variety -846.3 m 3 /t, for the Moskovsky variety -758.9 m 3 /t. The use of Plantafol fertilizer reduced water consumption by 1 ton of crop for the Kodryanka variety to 609.0 m 3 /t, for the Rizamat varietyup to 546.4 m 3 /t, for the Moskovsky varietyup to 511.5 m 3 /t. When using the Boroplus fertilizer, the water consumption coefficient for the Kodryanka variety decreased to 454.1 m 3 / t, for the Rizamat varietyup to 406.9 m 3 / t, for the Moskovsky varietyup to 427.5 m 3 /t. The minimum indicator was noted with the joint use of Plantafol and Boroplus: for the Kodryanka variety -363.2 m 3 /t, Rizamat -361.4 m 3 /t, Moskovsky -374.2 m 3 /t.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation water-use efficiency of table grapes increased from control to joint foliar fertilizer application in all three varieties.
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e2“The efficiency of irrigation water use increases from control to joint application of foliar dressings in all three varieties”
e3“This pattern can be traced over the years and on average over three years”
Claim · model-written summary
The water consumption coefficient of the Kodryanka variety in the control was 783.6 m3/t.
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e4“The water consumption coefficient in the control was: for the Kodryanka variety 783.6 m3/ t, for the Rizamat variety -846.3 m 3 /t, for the Moskovsky variety -758.9 m 3 /t”
Claim · model-written summary
The water consumption coefficient of the Rizamat variety in the control was 846.3 m3/t.
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e4“The water consumption coefficient in the control was: for the Kodryanka variety 783.6 m3/ t, for the Rizamat variety -846.3 m 3 /t, for the Moskovsky variety -758.9 m 3 /t”
Claim · model-written summary
The water consumption coefficient of the Moskovsky variety in the control was 758.9 m3/t.
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e4“The water consumption coefficient in the control was: for the Kodryanka variety 783.6 m3/ t, for the Rizamat variety -846.3 m 3 /t, for the Moskovsky variety -758.9 m 3 /t”
Claim · model-written summary
Plantafol fertilizer reduced water consumption per tonne of Kodryanka grapes to 609.0 m3/t.
- Taxon
- grapee1
- Material
- Kodryanka varietye5
- Treatment
- Plantafol fertilizere5
- Outcome
- water consumptione5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Value
- 609.0 m 3 /te5
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e5“The use of Plantafol fertilizer reduced water consumption by 1 ton of crop for the Kodryanka variety to 609.0 m 3 /t, for the Rizamat varietyup to 546.4 m 3 /t, for the Moskovsky varietyup to 511.5 m 3 /t”
Claim · model-written summary
Plantafol fertilizer reduced water consumption per tonne of Rizamat grapes to 546.4 m3/t.
- Taxon
- grapee1
- Material
- Rizamate5
- Treatment
- Plantafol fertilizere5
- Outcome
- water consumptione5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Value
- 546.4 m 3 /te5
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e5“The use of Plantafol fertilizer reduced water consumption by 1 ton of crop for the Kodryanka variety to 609.0 m 3 /t, for the Rizamat varietyup to 546.4 m 3 /t, for the Moskovsky varietyup to 511.5 m 3 /t”
Claim · model-written summary
Plantafol fertilizer reduced water consumption per tonne of Moskovsky grapes to 511.5 m3/t.
- Taxon
- grapee1
- Material
- Moskovskye5
- Treatment
- Plantafol fertilizere5
- Outcome
- water consumptione5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Value
- 511.5 m 3 /te5
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e5“The use of Plantafol fertilizer reduced water consumption by 1 ton of crop for the Kodryanka variety to 609.0 m 3 /t, for the Rizamat varietyup to 546.4 m 3 /t, for the Moskovsky varietyup to 511.5 m 3 /t”
Claim · model-written summary
Boroplus fertilizer decreased the water consumption coefficient of Kodryanka grapes to 454.1 m3/t.
- Taxon
- grapee1
- Material
- Kodryanka varietye6
- Treatment
- Boroplus fertilizere6
- Outcome
- water consumption coefficiente6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Value
- 454.1 m 3 / te6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e6“When using the Boroplus fertilizer, the water consumption coefficient for the Kodryanka variety decreased to 454.1 m 3 / t, for the Rizamat varietyup to 406.9 m 3 / t, for the Moskovsky varietyup to 427.5 m 3 /t”
Claim · model-written summary
Boroplus fertilizer decreased the water consumption coefficient of Rizamat grapes to 406.9 m3/t.
- Taxon
- grapee1
- Material
- Rizamate6
- Treatment
- Boroplus fertilizere6
- Outcome
- water consumption coefficiente6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Value
- 406.9 m 3 / te6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e6“When using the Boroplus fertilizer, the water consumption coefficient for the Kodryanka variety decreased to 454.1 m 3 / t, for the Rizamat varietyup to 406.9 m 3 / t, for the Moskovsky varietyup to 427.5 m 3 /t”
Claim · model-written summary
Boroplus fertilizer decreased the water consumption coefficient of Moskovsky grapes to 427.5 m3/t.
- Taxon
- grapee1
- Material
- Moskovskye6
- Treatment
- Boroplus fertilizere6
- Outcome
- water consumption coefficiente6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Value
- 427.5 m 3 /te6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e6“When using the Boroplus fertilizer, the water consumption coefficient for the Kodryanka variety decreased to 454.1 m 3 / t, for the Rizamat varietyup to 406.9 m 3 / t, for the Moskovsky varietyup to 427.5 m 3 /t”
Claim · model-written summary
Joint use of Plantafol and Boroplus gave the minimum water consumption coefficient of Kodryanka grapes, 363.2 m3/t.
- Taxon
- grapee1
- Material
- Kodryanka varietye7
- Treatment
- joint use of Plantafol and Boropluse7
- Outcome
- water consumption coefficiente6
- Direction
- minimume7
- Value
- 363.2 m 3 /te7
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e6“When using the Boroplus fertilizer, the water consumption coefficient for the Kodryanka variety decreased to 454.1 m 3 / t”
e7“The minimum indicator was noted with the joint use of Plantafol and Boroplus: for the Kodryanka variety -363.2 m 3 /t, Rizamat -361.4 m 3 /t, Moskovsky -374.2 m 3 /t”
Claim · model-written summary
Joint use of Plantafol and Boroplus gave the minimum water consumption coefficient of Rizamat grapes, 361.4 m3/t.
- Taxon
- grapee1
- Material
- Rizamate7
- Treatment
- joint use of Plantafol and Boropluse7
- Outcome
- water consumption coefficiente6
- Direction
- minimume7
- Value
- 361.4 m 3 /te7
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e6“When using the Boroplus fertilizer, the water consumption coefficient for the Kodryanka variety decreased to 454.1 m 3 / t”
e7“The minimum indicator was noted with the joint use of Plantafol and Boroplus: for the Kodryanka variety -363.2 m 3 /t, Rizamat -361.4 m 3 /t, Moskovsky -374.2 m 3 /t”
Claim · model-written summary
Joint use of Plantafol and Boroplus gave the minimum water consumption coefficient of Moskovsky grapes, 374.2 m3/t.
- Taxon
- grapee1
- Material
- Moskovskye7
- Treatment
- joint use of Plantafol and Boropluse7
- Outcome
- water consumption coefficiente6
- Direction
- minimume7
- Value
- 374.2 m 3 /te7
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”
e6“When using the Boroplus fertilizer, the water consumption coefficient for the Kodryanka variety decreased to 454.1 m 3 / t”
e7“The minimum indicator was noted with the joint use of Plantafol and Boroplus: for the Kodryanka variety -363.2 m 3 /t, Rizamat -361.4 m 3 /t, Moskovsky -374.2 m 3 /t”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · physiology: water · VitisPositive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.