Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Boroplus fertilizer decreased the water consumption coefficient of Kodryanka grapes to 454.1 m3/t.

A claim from WATER CONSUMPTION OF TABLE VARIETIES OF GRAPES DEPENDING ON ROOT FOOD IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE NORTH-WESTERN CASPIAN REGION · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boroplus fertilizer decreased the water consumption coefficient of Kodryanka grapes to 454.1 m3/t.

Taxon
grapee1
Material
Kodryanka varietye6
Treatment
Boroplus fertilizere6
Outcome
water consumption coefficiente6
Direction
decreasede6
Value
454.1 m 3 / te6

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e1

“table grape varieties of different ripening periods (Codryanka, Moskovsky, Rizamat)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–432
e6

“When using the Boroplus fertilizer, the water consumption coefficient for the Kodryanka variety decreased to 454.1 m 3 / t, for the Rizamat varietyup to 406.9 m 3 / t, for the Moskovsky varietyup to 427.5 m 3 /t”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1837–2048

Title

WATER CONSUMPTION OF TABLE VARIETIES OF GRAPES DEPENDING ON ROOT FOOD IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE NORTH-WESTERN CASPIAN REGION

E Polukhina; M Vlasenko; M Makarkina; et al. PROCEEDINGS of Nizhnevolzhskiy agrouniversity complex science and higher vocational education 2021. doi:10.32786/2071-9485-2021-01-19

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-a4ed0979752aefc8fc786e65e5b265252c82860d9bb47f01a76791b9880a03bb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

fertilization · physiology: water · VitisPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Supplemental inorganic fertilizer did not change vineyard water use in the short term.

    Determining grapevine water use under different sustainable agronomic practices using METRIC-UAV surface energy balance model · 2023

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Basal fertilizer showed no significant difference in leaves relative water content (RWC).

    Effect of Using Basal Fertilizer 15-15-15 on Leaf Chlorophyll a Fluorescence, Plant Growth and Fruit Yield of Table Grapes Grown under the Mediterranean Climate Conditions of the Northeast of Morocco · 2023 · compared with control (C)

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Compost improved soil porosity and water retention.

    GROWTH AND NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF APPLE TREES AND GRAPEVINES IN MUNICIPIAL SOLID-WASTE-AMENDED SOIL · 1995

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Drip irrigation and fertilization significantly improved water productivity and fertilizer agronomic use efficiency of grape compared with the CK and CG treatments.

    Optimizing drip fertigation management to simultaneously improve the yield, water productivity and fertilizer agronomic utilization efficiency of grapes in different precipitation year patterns · 2024 · compared with CK and CG treatments

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Organic fertilizer application significantly increased soil porosity, water retention capacity and soil water potential in the grape orchard.

    Effects of Organic Fertilizers on Soil Properties and Yield,Fruit Quality of 'Rizamat' Grape · 2013

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Compost increased intrinsic water use efficiency.

    Modulation of Grapevine Physiological Performance by Compost and Vermicompost Obtained from Vine Pruning Residues · 2026

    Same direction

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.