Paper · 2013 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of Organic Fertilizers on Soil Properties and Yield,Fruit Quality of 'Rizamat' Grape

Zhao Chang-jie

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To study the effects of organic fertilizers on soil properties,yield fruit quality of grape,an experiment was carried out in a grape orchard in Lipao Village,Yanqin County of Beijing during 2010-2011.The application amounts of organic fertilizer were 0,30,45 and 60 t/hm2,respectively.The results showed that the application of organic fertilizer caused significant increase of the content of soil organic matter,soil porosity,water retention capacity,soil water potential,and decrease of soil bulk density,which was accompanied with higher yield and better quality of grape.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer application significantly increased soil organic matter content in the grape orchard.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
organic fertilizere1
Outcome
content of soil organic mattere1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
grape orchard in Lipao Village,Yanqin County of Beijinge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“the application of organic fertilizer caused significant increase of the content of soil organic matter,soil porosity,water retention capacity,soil water potential,and decrease of soil bulk density,which was accompanied with higher yield and better quality of grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–574 · show in text ↑
e2

“an experiment was carried out in a grape orchard in Lipao Village,Yanqin County of Beijing during 2010-2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer application significantly increased soil porosity, water retention capacity and soil water potential in the grape orchard.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
organic fertilizere1
Outcome
soil porosity,water retention capacity,soil water potentiale1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
grape orchard in Lipao Village,Yanqin County of Beijinge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“the application of organic fertilizer caused significant increase of the content of soil organic matter,soil porosity,water retention capacity,soil water potential,and decrease of soil bulk density,which was accompanied with higher yield and better quality of grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–574 · show in text ↑
e2

“an experiment was carried out in a grape orchard in Lipao Village,Yanqin County of Beijing during 2010-2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer application significantly decreased soil bulk density in the grape orchard.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
organic fertilizere1
Outcome
soil bulk densitye1
Direction
decreasee1
Setting
grape orchard in Lipao Village,Yanqin County of Beijinge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“the application of organic fertilizer caused significant increase of the content of soil organic matter,soil porosity,water retention capacity,soil water potential,and decrease of soil bulk density,which was accompanied with higher yield and better quality of grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–574 · show in text ↑
e2

“an experiment was carried out in a grape orchard in Lipao Village,Yanqin County of Beijing during 2010-2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer application was accompanied by higher grape yield.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
organic fertilizere1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Setting
grape orchard in Lipao Village,Yanqin County of Beijinge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“the application of organic fertilizer caused significant increase of the content of soil organic matter,soil porosity,water retention capacity,soil water potential,and decrease of soil bulk density,which was accompanied with higher yield and better quality of grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–574 · show in text ↑
e2

“an experiment was carried out in a grape orchard in Lipao Village,Yanqin County of Beijing during 2010-2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer application was accompanied by better grape quality.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
organic fertilizere1
Outcome
qualitye1
Direction
bettere1
Setting
grape orchard in Lipao Village,Yanqin County of Beijinge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“the application of organic fertilizer caused significant increase of the content of soil organic matter,soil porosity,water retention capacity,soil water potential,and decrease of soil bulk density,which was accompanied with higher yield and better quality of grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–574 · show in text ↑
e2

“an experiment was carried out in a grape orchard in Lipao Village,Yanqin County of Beijing during 2010-2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–199 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · VitisPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · VitisPositive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 28 positive, 10 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · VitisResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.