Paper · 2022 · Agricultural Water Management

Determining organic-inorganic fertilizer application threshold to maximize the yield and quality of drip-irrigated grapes in an extremely arid area of Xinjiang, China

Rui Chen; Hongda Chang; Zhenhua Wang; et al.

14
claims
39
verbatim quotes
33
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Imbalanced water and fertilizer systems have limited the yield and quality of grapes in extremely arid areas. The combined application of organic (OF) and inorganic fertilizers (CF) has been proven to be one of the practical approaches to improving yield and quality. Nevertheless, very few studies have focused on the irrigation amount in organically fertilized and drip-irrigated grapes. Hence, in this study, four combined application ratios of organic and inorganic fertilizers (70%OF + 30%CF, 50%OF + 50%CF, 30%OF + 70%CF, and 0%OF + 100%CF), and four irrigation amounts (630, 675, 720, and 765 mm) were set coupling in a two-year field experiment. Generally, under four irrigation levels, combined organic-inorganic fertilizers increased soil nutrients and improved seedless white grape growth, yield, and quality. The results of the combined fertilizer application treatments showed that the content of available nitrogen (55.97–102.60%), available phosphorus (49.41–124.74%), and available potassium (60.70–124.33%) in soil increased significantly compared with those values under a single application of inorganic fertilizer. In addition, the combined application increased the length of new shoots and leaf midribs (grapes) by 3.16–11.88% and 7.35–15.15%, respectively; this application mode also significantly enhanced transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), and net photosynthetic rate (Pn). Furthermore, the grape yield increased by 6.68–19.12%, and the fruit quality notably improved (except for the index of fruit shape). Under the four irrigation amounts, two-year average yields were reported as 17.53, 20.60, 23.31, and 22.71 kg/ha, respectively. Additionally, we used four evaluation methods to assess the fruit quality and compared their correlations with the comprehensive evaluation model. And we concluded that the principal component analysis method (PCA) is best suited for evaluating drip-irrigated grapes’ quality. Then, we applied the PCA to seek proper irrigation management; the results displayed that a suitable irrigation amount of 720 mm and the ratio of organic-inorganic application of 50% organic fertilizer + 50% inorganic fertilizer is recommended. However, further research is required to investigate the effects of soluble and complete organic fertilizers application on drip-irrigated grapes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer increased soil available nitrogen by 55.97–102.60%.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
combined fertilizer application treatmentse1
Outcome
available nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0
Value
55.97–102.60%e0
Comparator
a single application of inorganic fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“available nitrogen (55.97–102.60%), available phosphorus (49.41–124.74%), and available potassium (60.70–124.33%) in soil increased significantly compared with those values under a single application of inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined fertilizer application treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–882 · show in text ↑
e2

“seedless white grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer increased soil available phosphorus by 49.41–124.74%.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
combined fertilizer application treatmentse1
Outcome
available phosphoruse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
49.41–124.74%e0
Comparator
a single application of inorganic fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“available nitrogen (55.97–102.60%), available phosphorus (49.41–124.74%), and available potassium (60.70–124.33%) in soil increased significantly compared with those values under a single application of inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined fertilizer application treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–882 · show in text ↑
e2

“seedless white grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer increased soil available potassium by 60.70–124.33%.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
combined fertilizer application treatmentse1
Outcome
available potassiume0
Direction
increasede0
Value
60.70–124.33%e0
Comparator
a single application of inorganic fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“available nitrogen (55.97–102.60%), available phosphorus (49.41–124.74%), and available potassium (60.70–124.33%) in soil increased significantly compared with those values under a single application of inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined fertilizer application treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–882 · show in text ↑
e2

“seedless white grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer increased new-shoot length by 3.16–11.88%.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
combined applicatione0
Outcome
length of new shootse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.16–11.88%e0
Comparator
single application of inorganic fertilizere1

Verbatim

e0

“the combined application increased the length of new shoots and leaf midribs (grapes) by 3.16–11.88% and 7.35–15.15%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1278 · show in text ↑
e1

“single application of inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer increased leaf-midrib length by 7.35–15.15%.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
combined applicatione0
Outcome
leaf midribse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.35–15.15%e0
Comparator
single application of inorganic fertilizere1

Verbatim

e0

“the combined application increased the length of new shoots and leaf midribs (grapes) by 3.16–11.88% and 7.35–15.15%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1278 · show in text ↑
e1

“single application of inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer enhanced grape transpiration, stomatal conductance and photosynthesis.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
this application modee0
Outcome
transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), and net photosynthetic rate (Pn)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
single application of inorganic fertilizere2

Verbatim

e0

“this application mode also significantly enhanced transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), and net photosynthetic rate (Pn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1414 · show in text ↑
e1

“seedless white grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–799 · show in text ↑
e2

“single application of inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer increased grape yield by 6.68–19.12%.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
combined applicatione1
Outcome
grape yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.68–19.12%e0
Comparator
single application of inorganic fertilizere2

Verbatim

e0

“the grape yield increased by 6.68–19.12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1469 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application increased the length of new shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1207 · show in text ↑
e2

“single application of inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer improved fruit quality except fruit shape.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
combined applicatione2
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
except for the index of fruit shapee0
Comparator
single application of inorganic fertilizere3

Verbatim

e0

“the fruit quality notably improved (except for the index of fruit shape)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1547 · show in text ↑
e1

“grape yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1444 · show in text ↑
e2

“the combined application increased the length of new shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1207 · show in text ↑
e3

“single application of inorganic fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 630 mm irrigation, the two-year average yield was 17.53 kg/ha.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
630e0
Outcome
average yieldse1
Value
17.53e1

Verbatim

e0

“four irrigation amounts (630, 675, 720, and 765 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year average yields were reported as 17.53, 20.60, 23.31, and 22.71 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1675 · show in text ↑
e2

“grape yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1444 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 675 mm irrigation, the two-year average yield was 20.60 kg/ha.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
675e0
Outcome
average yieldse1
Value
20.60e1

Verbatim

e0

“four irrigation amounts (630, 675, 720, and 765 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year average yields were reported as 17.53, 20.60, 23.31, and 22.71 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1675 · show in text ↑
e2

“grape yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1444 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 720 mm irrigation, the two-year average yield was 23.31 kg/ha.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
720e0
Outcome
average yieldse1
Value
23.31e1

Verbatim

e0

“four irrigation amounts (630, 675, 720, and 765 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year average yields were reported as 17.53, 20.60, 23.31, and 22.71 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1675 · show in text ↑
e2

“grape yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1444 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 765 mm irrigation, the two-year average yield was 22.71 kg/ha.

Taxon
grapee2
Treatment
765 mme0
Outcome
average yieldse1
Value
22.71 kg/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“four irrigation amounts (630, 675, 720, and 765 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year average yields were reported as 17.53, 20.60, 23.31, and 22.71 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1675 · show in text ↑
e2

“grape yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1444 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA was judged best suited for evaluating drip-irrigated grape quality.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
best suited for evaluating drip-irrigated grapes’ qualitye0
Comparator
four evaluation methodse1

Verbatim

e0

“the principal component analysis method (PCA) is best suited for evaluating drip-irrigated grapes’ quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1846–1952 · show in text ↑
e1

“four evaluation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1722 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 720 mm irrigation and a 50/50 organic-inorganic fertilizer ratio.

Taxon
grapese1
Outcome
a suitable irrigation amount of 720 mm and the ratio of organic-inorganic application of 50% organic fertilizer + 50% inorganic fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“a suitable irrigation amount of 720 mm and the ratio of organic-inorganic application of 50% organic fertilizer + 50% inorganic fertilizer is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2197 · show in text ↑
e1

“drip-irrigated grapes’ quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–1952 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · VitisPositive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.