Paper · 2021 · AIP conference proceedings

Efficiency of using nanosilicon for soaking seeds and foliar treatment of eggplant samples in unheated greenhouses

Andi Magomadov; Svetlana Sergeevna Avdeenko; Aleksey Petrovich Avdeenko

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The article evaluates the data on the effect of foliar feeding and soaking of seeds with different dosages of biological Nanosilicon when grown in ground greenhouses of the Rostov region of varieties and hybrids of eggplant. The data show the effectiveness of the preparation Nanosilicon at a dose of 0.35 g/kg for soaking seeds in increasing the number of fruits on plants for all varieties and hybrids in the experiment with the maximum effect for the Solaris variety and the Pelikan hybrid. When vegetating plants are treated with different norms of Nanosilicon, the Solaris variety and the Pelikan and Fioletovoye Chudo hybrids have a higher indicator. An increase in the norm of the preparation both during soaking and when treating vegetative plants did not lead to an increase in the value of this indicator for all varieties and hybrids. The maximum yield when soaking seeds at a dose of Nanosilicon 0.35 g/kg of seeds is noted in the Solaris variety - 14.8 kg/m2, which is 0.6-0.7 kg/m2 more than Pelikan and Fioletovoye Chudo hybrids. Modern varieties and hybrids against the background of the use of the Nanosilicon preparation for soaking seeds and foliar feeding are less affected by verticillosis and fusarium, reaching a maximum in the Sirenevyi Tuman hybrid. The data obtained indicate a greater efficiency of foliar fertilization in comparison with soaking seeds, and an increase in the dose of Nanosilicon when soaking above 0.35 g/kg and 110 g/ha when treating vegetative plants is not effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking with 0.35 g/kg Nanosilicon increased fruit number across tested varieties and hybrids.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
Nanosilicon at a dose of 0.35 g/kg for soaking seedse0
Outcome
number of fruits on plantse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nanosilicon at a dose of 0.35 g/kg for soaking seeds in increasing the number of fruits on plants for all varieties and hybrids in the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–421 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fruit-number response to seed soaking was greatest in Solaris.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Material
Solarise0
Outcome
maximum effecte0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum effect for the Solaris variety and the Pelikan hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fruit-number response to seed soaking was greatest in Pelikan.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Material
Pelikane0
Outcome
maximum effecte0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum effect for the Solaris variety and the Pelikan hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During plant treatment with Nanosilicon, Solaris had a higher fruit indicator.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Material
Solarise0
Treatment
Nanosilicone0
Outcome
higher indicatore0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When vegetating plants are treated with different norms of Nanosilicon, the Solaris variety and the Pelikan and Fioletovoye Chudo hybrids have a higher indicator.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During plant treatment with Nanosilicon, Pelikan had a higher fruit indicator.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Material
Pelikane0
Treatment
Nanosilicone0
Outcome
higher indicatore0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When vegetating plants are treated with different norms of Nanosilicon, the Solaris variety and the Pelikan and Fioletovoye Chudo hybrids have a higher indicator.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During plant treatment with Nanosilicon, Fioletovoye Chudo had a higher fruit indicator.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Material
Fioletovoye Chudoe0
Treatment
Nanosilicone0
Outcome
higher indicatore0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When vegetating plants are treated with different norms of Nanosilicon, the Solaris variety and the Pelikan and Fioletovoye Chudo hybrids have a higher indicator.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Nanosilicon rate during soaking or plant treatment did not increase the reported indicator.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
increase in the norm of the preparatione0
Outcome
value of this indicatore0
Direction
did not lead to an increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in the norm of the preparation both during soaking and when treating vegetative plants did not lead to an increase in the value of this indicator for all varieties and hybrids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solaris yielded 14.8 kg/m2 after soaking with 0.35 g/kg Nanosilicon.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Material
Solarise0
Treatment
Nanosilicon 0.35 g/kg of seedse0
Outcome
maximum yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.8 kg/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum yield when soaking seeds at a dose of Nanosilicon 0.35 g/kg of seeds is noted in the Solaris variety - 14.8 kg/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanosilicon-treated varieties and hybrids were less affected by verticillosis and fusarium.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
Nanosilicon preparation for soaking seeds and foliar feedinge0
Outcome
verticillosis and fusariume0
Direction
less affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modern varieties and hybrids against the background of the use of the Nanosilicon preparation for soaking seeds and foliar feeding are less affected by verticillosis and fusarium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sirenevyi Tuman showed the maximum disease benefit.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Material
Sirenevyi Tumane0
Outcome
maximume0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reaching a maximum in the Sirenevyi Tuman hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization was more efficient than seed soaking.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Treatment
foliar fertilizatione0
Outcome
efficiencye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
soaking seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater efficiency of foliar fertilization in comparison with soaking seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that soaking above 0.35 g/kg and plant treatment above 110 g/ha were ineffective.

Taxon
eggplantSolanum melongenat0
Outcome
increase in the dose of Nanosilicon when soaking above 0.35 g/kg and 110 g/ha when treating vegetative plants is not effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the dose of Nanosilicon when soaking above 0.35 g/kg and 110 g/ha when treating vegetative plants is not effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“eggplant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 74 positive, 3 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.