Paper · 2008 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences /Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

EFFECT OF PLOUGHING DEPTH AND MANURE ON CORN YIELD

M. El-Nady

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of three tillage and three manure treatments on some soil physical properties, grain yield and some yield components of corn. The tillage treatments were no tillage (To), chisel plough to 10 cm (T 1 ) , and to 20 cm (T 2 ) soil depth. The manure treatments were, cattle manure (M 1 ), rice straw (M 2 ), and ( cattle manure + rice straw) (M 3 ). Measurements of soil bulk density (Bd) and soil penetration resistance (PR) were taken to quantify the ploughing depth. Available water capacity (AWC) was calculated for all treatments. The measurements were taken twice, after ploughing and before harvest. Yield and yield components (weight of 100 grain yield (gm), weight of ear (gm), and grain yield/fed.) were obtained. The data showed that the lowest (Bd) and (PR) were obtained in the surface layer of T 2 and M 2 treatments while, the highest (AWC) was recorded in T 0 and M 2 treatments. The results also showed that the highest 100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yield were obtained with T 2 as compared with T 1 and To. However, the difference among the ploughing treatments was not significant. Application of manure showed that the highest 100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yield of corn were recorded with (M 2 ) comparing with (M1) and (M3) treatments. Interaction effect between ploughing depth and manure treatments influenced the grain yield, and the yield components. The combination treatment (T 2 M 2 ) recorded the highest 100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yield. A significant difference between (T 2 M 2 ) and (T 2 M 3 ) was obtained. These results concluded that the combination of soil ploughing to 20 cm depth with the application of rice straw increased corn grain yield. This increase is due to the effect of tillage and the incorporation of rice straw on the improvement of the soil physical properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 and M2 had the lowest surface soil bulk density and penetration resistance.

Treatment
T 2 and M 2 treatmentse0
Outcome
lowest (Bd) and (PR)e0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest (Bd) and (PR) were obtained in the surface layer of T 2 and M 2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T0 and M2 had the highest available water capacity.

Treatment
T 0 and M 2 treatmentse0
Outcome
highest (AWC)e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest (AWC) was recorded in T 0 and M 2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 produced the highest 100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yield versus T1 and T0, without a significant difference among ploughing treatments.

Treatment
T 2e0
Outcome
100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
T 1 and Toe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest 100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yield were obtained with T 2 as compared with T 1 and To. However, the difference among the ploughing treatments was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M2 produced the highest 100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yield versus M1 and M3.

Treatment
M 2e0
Outcome
100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
M1) and (M3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest 100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yield of corn were recorded with (M 2 ) comparing with (M1) and (M3) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1327 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tillage by manure interaction influenced corn grain yield and yield components.

Treatment
ploughing depth and manure treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yield, and the yield componentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effect between ploughing depth and manure treatments influenced the grain yield, and the yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T2M2 had the highest 100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yield.

Treatment
T 2 M 2e0
Outcome
100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination treatment (T 2 M 2 ) recorded the highest 100 grain weight, ear weight and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T2M2 differed significantly from T2M3.

Treatment
T 2 M 2e0
Outcome
significant differencee0
Comparator
T 2 M 3e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant difference between (T 2 M 2 ) and (T 2 M 3 ) was obtained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1623 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ploughing to 20 cm with rice straw increased corn grain yield.

Treatment
soil ploughing to 20 cm depth with the application of rice strawe0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of soil ploughing to 20 cm depth with the application of rice straw increased corn grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1764 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attribute the yield increase to improved soil physical properties from tillage and rice straw.

Treatment
tillage and the incorporation of rice strawe0
Outcome
improvement of the soil physical propertiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This increase is due to the effect of tillage and the incorporation of rice straw on the improvement of the soil physical properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1898 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–44 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 63 positive, 3 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.