Paper · 2016 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences /Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

EFFECT OF SOWING DATE, FERTILIZERS AND BROOMRAPE CONTROL TREATMENTS ON FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.) PRODUCTIVITY.

A. Fakkar; H. Ibrahim; M. Raslan

16
claims
44
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out during two successive seasons (2013/2014 and 2014/2015) in naturally Orobanche infested soil at Shandaweel Research Station, Agricultural Research Center, Sohag Governorate. Studies were carried out to investigate the effect of two sowing dates (middle of October and first of November), three fertilizations (mineral fertilization at a rate of 20 kg N/fed, Farm yard manure at a rate of 20 m 3 /fed and no fertilization) and five broomrape control treatments (glyphosate at a rate 50 cm 3 /fed+hand pulling once (H.P), glyphosate at a rate 75 cm 3 /fed+hand pulling once, glyphosate twice at a rate of 75+50 cm 3 /fed, hand pulling twice and untreated) on broomrape control and faba bean productivity. The results showed that sowing date, first of November significantly reduced both the dry weight of broomrape as compared to the other sowing date (mid. of October). The decreasing percentage in weight of broomrape by sowing on the first of November was 23.54% as compared with the first sowing date (mid. of October). Sowing date mid. of October recorded the highest values of growth characters, yield and yield attributes. The mineral and organic fertilizers significantly reduced both the number and dry weights of broomrape compared with the control. Moreover, mineral fertilizer delayed shoot emergence above the soil. Also, the fertilizer recorded the highest values of growth characters, yield and yield attributes. Application of glyphosate once with a rate of 50 cm 3 or (glyphosate one time with rate 75cm 3 /fed) glyphosate two times with a rate of 50 cm 3 + 75 cm 3 significantly decreased the number, dry weight of proomrape and delayed its emergence compared with the untreated plots. Hand pulling twice was the most significant treatment in increasing yield and yield attributes . Moreover, hand pulling twice and glyphosate two times 50+75 caused faba bean seed yield increase of 75.8 and 72.2% respectively. Meanwhile applying glyphosate once at a rate of 50 cm 3 and once at rate of 75 cm 3 resulted in an increase of 69.6 and 63.2%9 in faba bean seed yield; respectively, over the untreated control treatment. Maximum seed yield was obtained with sowing on mid. of October, adding mineral fertilization and the application of glyphosate two times 50+75. There was a strong negative correlation between faba bean seed yield and the number and weight of Orobanche infestation/m 2 (r = -0.548**,-0.528** respectively). Also, it is clear that these treatments which had low Orobanche infestation had good growth patterns and hence showed high seed yield

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on the first of November significantly reduced broomrape dry weight by 23.54% compared with mid-October sowing.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
sowing date, first of Novembere1
Interactor
broomrapet1parasite
Outcome
dry weight of broomrapee1
Direction
reducede1
Value
23.54%e2
Comparator
mid. of Octobere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“BROOMRAPE CONTROL TREATMENTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that sowing date, first of November significantly reduced both the dry weight of broomrape as compared to the other sowing date (mid. of October)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–906 · show in text ↑
e2

“The decreasing percentage in weight of broomrape by sowing on the first of November was 23.54% as compared with the first sowing date (mid. of October)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1059 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing on mid-October gave the highest growth characters, yield and yield attributes.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Sowing date mid. of Octobere3
Outcome
growth characters, yield and yield attributese3
Direction
higheste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e3

“Sowing date mid. of October recorded the highest values of growth characters, yield and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral and organic fertilizers significantly reduced the number and dry weight of broomrape compared with the control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
mineral and organic fertilizerse4
Interactor
broomrapet1parasite
Outcome
number and dry weights of broomrapee4
Direction
reducede4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“BROOMRAPE CONTROL TREATMENTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
e4

“The mineral and organic fertilizers significantly reduced both the number and dry weights of broomrape compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1295 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer delayed broomrape shoot emergence above the soil.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
mineral fertilizere5
Outcome
shoot emergence above the soile5
Direction
delayede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e5

“Moreover, mineral fertilizer delayed shoot emergence above the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1364 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer gave the highest growth characters, yield and yield attributes.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
the fertilizere6
Outcome
growth characters, yield and yield attributese6
Direction
higheste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e6

“Also, the fertilizer recorded the highest values of growth characters, yield and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate applications significantly decreased the number and dry weight of broomrape compared with untreated plots.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
glyphosatee7
Interactor
broomrapet1parasite
Outcome
number, dry weight of proomrapee7
Direction
decreasede7
Comparator
untreated plotse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“BROOMRAPE CONTROL TREATMENTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
e7

“glyphosate two times with a rate of 50 cm 3 + 75 cm 3 significantly decreased the number, dry weight of proomrape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1679 · show in text ↑
e3

“delayed its emergence compared with the untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate delayed broomrape emergence compared with untreated plots.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
glyphosatee7
Interactor
broomrapet1parasite
Outcome
emergencee3
Direction
delayede3
Comparator
untreated plotse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
t1

“BROOMRAPE CONTROL TREATMENTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–67 · show in text ↑
e7

“glyphosate two times with a rate of 50 cm 3 + 75 cm 3 significantly decreased the number, dry weight of proomrape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1679 · show in text ↑
e3

“delayed its emergence compared with the untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1739 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand pulling twice gave the most significant increase in yield and yield attributes.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Hand pulling twicee1
Outcome
yield and yield attributese1
Direction
increasinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand pulling twice was the most significant treatment in increasing yield and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand pulling twice increased faba bean seed yield by 75.8% over the untreated control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
hand pulling twicee1
Outcome
faba bean seed yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
75.8e1
Comparator
untreated control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“hand pulling twice and glyphosate two times 50+75 caused faba bean seed yield increase of 75.8 and 72.2% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–1965 · show in text ↑
e2

“over the untreated control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate applied twice (50+75 cm3) increased faba bean seed yield by 72.2% over the untreated control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
glyphosate two times 50+75e1
Outcome
faba bean seed yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
72.2e1
Comparator
untreated control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“hand pulling twice and glyphosate two times 50+75 caused faba bean seed yield increase of 75.8 and 72.2% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–1965 · show in text ↑
e2

“over the untreated control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate applied once at 50 cm3 increased faba bean seed yield by 69.6% over the untreated control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
glyphosate once at a rate of 50 cm 3e1
Outcome
faba bean seed yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
69.6e1
Comparator
untreated control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying glyphosate once at a rate of 50 cm 3 and once at rate of 75 cm 3 resulted in an increase of 69.6 and 63.2%9 in faba bean seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1977–2117 · show in text ↑
e2

“over the untreated control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate applied once at 75 cm3 increased faba bean seed yield by 63.2% over the untreated control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
glyphosate one time with rate 75cm 3 /fede1
Outcome
faba bean seed yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
63.2%e2
Comparator
untreated control treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“glyphosate one time with rate 75cm 3 /fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1564 · show in text ↑
e2

“applying glyphosate once at a rate of 50 cm 3 and once at rate of 75 cm 3 resulted in an increase of 69.6 and 63.2%9 in faba bean seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1977–2117 · show in text ↑
e3

“over the untreated control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2169 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum seed yield was obtained with mid-October sowing, mineral fertilization and glyphosate applied twice (50+75).

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
sowing on mid. of October, adding mineral fertilization and the application of glyphosate two times 50+75e1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
Maximume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum seed yield was obtained with sowing on mid. of October, adding mineral fertilization and the application of glyphosate two times 50+75”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2313 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean seed yield was strongly negatively correlated with the number of Orobanche infestations per m2 (r = -0.548).

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Interactor
OrobancheOrobanchee1parasite
Outcome
faba bean seed yielde1
Direction
negativee1
Value
-0.548**e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Orobanche
Orobanche · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Teun Spaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a strong negative correlation between faba bean seed yield and the number and weight of Orobanche infestation/m 2 (r = -0.548**,-0.528** respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2315–2475 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean seed yield was strongly negatively correlated with the weight of Orobanche infestations per m2 (r = -0.528).

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Interactor
OrobancheOrobanchee1parasite
Outcome
faba bean seed yielde1
Direction
negativee1
Value
-0.528**e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Orobanche
Orobanche · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Teun Spaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a strong negative correlation between faba bean seed yield and the number and weight of Orobanche infestation/m 2 (r = -0.548**,-0.528** respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2315–2475 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments with low Orobanche infestation had good growth patterns and hence high seed yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
low Orobanche infestatione1
Interactor
OrobancheOrobanchee1parasite
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
highe1
Qualifier
good growth patternse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Orobanche
Orobanche · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Teun Spaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN (VICIA FABA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“these treatments which had low Orobanche infestation had good growth patterns and hence showed high seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2500–2610 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

glyphosate · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sowing time · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 67 positive, 6 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.