Paper · 2021 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Yield of common bean cultivars and castor hybrids intercropped in two cultivation sites with oxisol in the Midwest region of Brazil

Rosane Angélica Anjos; Cristiane Lisboa; Gisele Silva; et al.

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The consortium between bean and castor aims to increase the yield per unit area and sustainability in land use. This system has several benefits, but the use of different genetic materials must be carefully evaluated, especially the behavior of smaller castor hybrids, since little research on their use in a consortium system is available. This study aimed to evaluate the components of production and yield of common bean cultivars and small castor hybrids, in two field experiments conducted in the intercropping and monoculture systems, in 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 harvests, in two cultivation sites in the Midwest region of Brazil. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized block design, in a 4 x 2 + 6 factorial scheme, composed of four common bean genetic materials of different growth types and colors (Pérola, BRS Esteio, BRS Pitanga, and BRSMG Realce), a consortium with two short castor hybrid cultivars (Tamar and Agima 110204) and six additional treatments and bean and castor genetic material in monoculture, with three replications. Agronomic components and grain yields were determined in both experiments, for bean cultivars and castor hybrids. Bean and castor genetic materials presented the same agronomic performance in the studied agricultural and local crops, regardless of the cropping system. The intercropping between common bean cultivars (BRS Esteio, BRSMG Realce and BRS Pitanga) and castor hybrids (Tamar and Ag Ima) was classified as viable by the area equivalence index, since this index presented values greater than 1.0 for the intercropping between these cultivars. Thus, it is recommended for common bean in a system intercropped with small castor hybrids, regardless of the cultivated genetic material

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean and castor genetic materials showed the same agronomic performance regardless of the cropping system (intercropping or monoculture).

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
cropping systeme1
Outcome
agronomic performancee1
Direction
samee1
Comparator
monoculturee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of common bean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bean and castor genetic materials presented the same agronomic performance in the studied agricultural and local crops, regardless of the cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1327 · show in text ↑
e2

“conducted in the intercropping and monoculture systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping of common bean cultivars with small castor hybrids was classified as viable by the area equivalence index, with values above 1.0.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
BRS Esteio, BRSMG Realce and BRS Pitangae3
Outcome
area equivalence indexe3
Value
values greater than 1.0e3
Qualifier
viablee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of common bean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e3

“The intercropping between common bean cultivars (BRS Esteio, BRSMG Realce and BRS Pitanga) and castor hybrids (Tamar and Ag Ima) was classified as viable by the area equivalence index, since this index presented values greater than 1.0 for the intercropping between these cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1610 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Common bean is recommended for a system intercropped with small castor hybrids, regardless of the cultivated genetic material.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
system intercropped with small castor hybridse4
Qualifier
regardless of the cultivated genetic materiale4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of common bean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e4

“it is recommended for common bean in a system intercropped with small castor hybrids, regardless of the cultivated genetic material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1749 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.