Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bean and castor genetic materials showed the same agronomic performance regardless of the cropping system (intercropping or monoculture).

A claim from Yield of common bean cultivars and castor hybrids intercropped in two cultivation sites with oxisol in the Midwest region of Brazil · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean and castor genetic materials showed the same agronomic performance regardless of the cropping system (intercropping or monoculture).

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
cropping systeme1
Outcome
agronomic performancee1
Direction
samee1
Comparator
monoculturee2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of common bean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30
e1

“Bean and castor genetic materials presented the same agronomic performance in the studied agricultural and local crops, regardless of the cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1327
e2

“conducted in the intercropping and monoculture systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–539

Title

Yield of common bean cultivars and castor hybrids intercropped in two cultivation sites with oxisol in the Midwest region of Brazil

Rosane Angélica Anjos; Cristiane Lisboa; Gisele Silva; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2021. doi:10.21475/ajcs.21.15.10.p3255

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-0e79f3d71fa479c7471b577cc27e019659f1361d95e771d187d572d87c779d5d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

cultivation system · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.