Paper · 2022 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Effect of Irrigation Water and Organic Fertilizer on Reducing Nitrate Accumulation and Boosting Lettuce Productivity

Shaimaa Hassan Abd–Elrahman; Hani Saber Saudy; Dalia Ahmed Abd El–Fattah; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
154
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Accumulation of high level of nitrate (NO 3 − ) in leaves is a serious issue for vegetable crops like lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.). Therefore, this study aimed to limit NO 3 − level by adjusting the balance between fertilization and irrigation program in lettuce. In a strip plot design with three replicates, lettuce plants were grown under four fertilizer treatments and three irrigation regimes. Three organic fertilizers (biochar, compost and vermicompost), in addition to mineral fertilizer, were used. The irrigation regimes were 60, 80 and 100% of crop evapotranspiration, ETc (ETc60, ETc80, and ETc100). Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) potassium (K) and organic matter (OM) in soil as well as yield, N, P, K and NO 3 − of lettuce were estimated. Findings showed that vermicompost or biochar (with any irrigation regime) as well as compost with irrigation by ETc60 were the effective combinations for increasing K content in soil after harvest. Under irrigation by ETc80 or ETc100, vermicompost or biochar were the efficient treatments for increasing lettuce yield equaling the farmer common practice (ETc100 x mineral fertilizer). Under irrigation by ETc60, mineral fertilizer or vermicompost showed the highest lettuce leaf content of K. Moreover, ETc60 or ETc80 x mineral fertilizer recorded the maximum NO 3 − content of lettuce leaves. The accumulation of nitrate in lettuce leaves owing to mineral fertilizer reached about 1.24 times than that of organic fertilizers. Compost x ETc80 or ETc100 showed the minimal NO 3 –N accumulation, hence, high relative reductions in NO 3 –N accumulation as compared to the common practice (ETc100 x mineral fertilizer) were observed. In conclusion, irrigation by 80% instead of 100% of crop evapotranspiration of organically fertilized lettuce (especially with vermicompost) could be adopted since such practice recorded high lettuce productivity with low NO 3 − content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost or biochar under any irrigation regime, and compost with ETc60, increased postharvest soil K.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
vermicompost or biochar (with any irrigation regime) as well as compost with irrigation by ETc60e1
Outcome
K content in soil after harveste1
Direction
increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“vermicompost or biochar (with any irrigation regime) as well as compost with irrigation by ETc60 were the effective combinations for increasing K content in soil after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost with ETc80 or ETc100 increased lettuce yield to the level of common practice.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
lettuce yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
Under irrigation by ETc80 or ETc100e1
Comparator
farmer common practice (ETc100 x mineral fertilizer)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vermicompost or biochar were the efficient treatments for increasing lettuce yield equaling the farmer common practice (ETc100 x mineral fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under irrigation by ETc80 or ETc100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar with ETc80 or ETc100 increased lettuce yield to the level of common practice.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
lettuce yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
Under irrigation by ETc80 or ETc100e1
Comparator
farmer common practice (ETc100 x mineral fertilizer)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vermicompost or biochar were the efficient treatments for increasing lettuce yield equaling the farmer common practice (ETc100 x mineral fertilizer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under irrigation by ETc80 or ETc100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer under ETc60 produced the highest lettuce leaf K content.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
lettuce leaf content of Ke0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
Under irrigation by ETc60e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under irrigation by ETc60, mineral fertilizer or vermicompost showed the highest lettuce leaf content of K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost under ETc60 produced the highest lettuce leaf K content.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
vermicomposte0
Outcome
lettuce leaf content of Ke0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under irrigation by ETc60, mineral fertilizer or vermicompost showed the highest lettuce leaf content of K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ETc60 with mineral fertilizer produced maximum lettuce leaf nitrate content.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
ETc60e0
Outcome
NO 3 − content of lettuce leavese0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
mineral fertilizere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ETc60 or ETc80 x mineral fertilizer recorded the maximum NO 3 − content of lettuce leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1352 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ETc80 with mineral fertilizer produced maximum lettuce leaf nitrate content.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
ETc80 x mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
NO 3 − content of lettuce leavese0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ETc60 or ETc80 x mineral fertilizer recorded the maximum NO 3 − content of lettuce leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1352 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer yielded about 1.24 times the nitrate accumulation of organic fertilizers.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
accumulation of nitrate in lettuce leavese0
Direction
reachede0
Value
1.24 timese0
Comparator
organic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The accumulation of nitrate in lettuce leaves owing to mineral fertilizer reached about 1.24 times than that of organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost with ETc80 minimized lettuce nitrate nitrogen accumulation.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
Compost x ETc80e0
Outcome
NO 3 –N accumulatione0
Direction
minimale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost x ETc80 or ETc100 showed the minimal NO 3 –N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1552 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost with ETc100 minimized lettuce nitrate nitrogen accumulation.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
ETc100e0
Outcome
NO 3 –N accumulatione0
Direction
minimale0
Qualifier
Composte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost x ETc80 or ETc100 showed the minimal NO 3 –N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1552 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–139 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend ETc80 irrigation for organically fertilized lettuce, especially with vermicompost, for high productivity and low nitrate.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Outcome
irrigation by 80% instead of 100% of crop evapotranspiration of organically fertilized lettuce (especially with vermicompost) could be adoptede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation by 80% instead of 100% of crop evapotranspiration of organically fertilized lettuce (especially with vermicompost) could be adopted since such practice recorded high lettuce productivity with low NO 3 − content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1705–1926 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 32 positive, 25 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 51 positive, 12 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

137 papers: 112 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

249 papers: 213 positive, 36 negative or no effect

212 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

245 papers more in this group

See all 249 papers →

biochar · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.