Abstract
In general, conventional tillage averaged nearly 40 bu/acre greater corn yield than no-till likely because of improved growth during the season. With conventional tillage, all side-dress treatments resulted in greater yield than with all N applied pre-plant. However, in lower-yielding no-till systems, the yield response to side-dress applications appeared to be greater for V10 applications compared with those at V6.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage averaged nearly 40 bu/acre greater corn yield than no-till.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0 - Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- corn yielde0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- nearly 40 bu/acree0
- Comparator
- no-tille0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“conventional tillage averaged nearly 40 bu/acre greater corn yield than no-till”
t0“Timing of Side-Dress Applications of N for Corn in Conventional and No-Till Systems”
Claim · model-written summary
With conventional tillage, every side-dress treatment yielded more than all nitrogen applied before planting.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- all side-dress treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- all N applied pre-plante0
- Setting
- conventional tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“With conventional tillage, all side-dress treatments resulted in greater yield than with all N applied pre-plant”
t0“Timing of Side-Dress Applications of N for Corn in Conventional and No-Till Systems”
Claim · model-written summary
In no-till systems, the side-dress yield response appeared greater at V10 than V6.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- V10 applicationse0
- Outcome
- yield responsee0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- appeared to bee0
- Comparator
- those at V6e0
- Setting
- no-till systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in lower-yielding no-till systems, the yield response to side-dress applications appeared to be greater for V10 applications compared with those at V6”
t0“Timing of Side-Dress Applications of N for Corn in Conventional and No-Till Systems”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.