Paper · 2022 · Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture

Evaluation of pigeon-pea based intercropping systems under irrigated conditions in coastal Odisha

P. K. Panda; I.O.P. Mishra; S.S. Bal; et al.

13
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment conducted for over two years (2016-17 and 2017-18) at the Centre for Pulses Research (OUAT), Berhampur-761001, under irrigated rabi conditions in coastal Odisha testing six intercropping combinations of pigeon pea (cv. manak) with three vegetables (yam bean (safed hyb. sakalu), french bean (falguni latika) and cowpea (kashi kanchan) in two proportions (1:1; 2:2) and 4 sole crops, revealed that intercropping combinations recorded higher pigeon pea seed equivalent yield than the respective sole crops. Performance of paired row sowing was found superior with 38.24 g ha-1 of pigeon pea seed equivalent yield than with single row intercropping (32.71 q ha-1). Among the three intercrops, the french bean system was found most remunerative with 41.13 q ha-1 pigeon pea seed equivalent yield followed by yam bean (37.84 q ha-1), but superior to cowpea systems (27.46 q ha-1). Maximum pigeon pea seed equivalent yield (44.09 q ha-1), net return (Rs. 2,31,473/-) and B:C ratio (3.99) were recorded with pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportion. This system also registered maximum land equivalent ratio (1.62), monetary advantage index (Rs. 74,176 ha-1) and system relative crowding coefficient (9.86). Aggressivity and competition ratio indicated that french bean and cowpea were dominant on pigeon pea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping gave higher pigeon pea seed equivalent yield than sole crops.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
intercropping combinationse1
Outcome
pigeon pea seed equivalent yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
respective sole cropse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping combinations of pigeon pea (cv. manak) with three vegetables (yam bean (safed hyb. sakalu), french bean (falguni latika) and cowpea (kashi kanchan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–355 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping combinations recorded higher pigeon pea seed equivalent yield than the respective sole crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows yielded 38.24 g ha-1, superior to single rows at 32.71 q ha-1.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
paired row sowinge1
Outcome
pigeon pea seed equivalent yielde1
Direction
superiore1
Value
38.24 g ha-1e1
Qualifier
32.71 q ha-1e1
Comparator
single row intercroppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea (cv. manak)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–246 · show in text ↑
e1

“Performance of paired row sowing was found superior with 38.24 g ha-1 of pigeon pea seed equivalent yield than with single row intercropping (32.71 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

French bean intercrops were most remunerative, with 41.13 q ha-1 seed equivalent yield.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
french bean systeme1
Outcome
pigeon pea seed equivalent yielde1
Direction
superiore1
Value
41.13 q ha-1e1
Comparator
cowpea systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea (cv. manak)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–246 · show in text ↑
e1

“the french bean system was found most remunerative with 41.13 q ha-1 pigeon pea seed equivalent yield followed by yam bean (37.84 q ha-1), but superior to cowpea systems (27.46 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–895 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yam bean intercrops yielded 37.84 q ha-1 seed equivalent.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
yam beane1
Value
37.84 q ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea (cv. manak)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–246 · show in text ↑
e1

“yam bean (37.84 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–848 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercrops yielded 27.46 q ha-1 seed equivalent.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
cowpea systemse1
Value
27.46 q ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea (cv. manak)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–246 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea systems (27.46 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–895 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2:2 pigeon pea–french bean system had maximum seed equivalent yield of 44.09 q ha-1.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportione0
Outcome
pigeon pea seed equivalent yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
44.09 q ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum pigeon pea seed equivalent yield (44.09 q ha-1), net return (Rs. 2,31,473/-) and B:C ratio (3.99) were recorded with pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1061 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2:2 pigeon pea–french bean system had maximum net return of Rs. 2,31,473/-.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportione0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
Rs. 2,31,473/-e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum pigeon pea seed equivalent yield (44.09 q ha-1), net return (Rs. 2,31,473/-) and B:C ratio (3.99) were recorded with pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1061 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2:2 pigeon pea–french bean system had maximum B:C ratio of 3.99.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportione0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
3.99e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum pigeon pea seed equivalent yield (44.09 q ha-1), net return (Rs. 2,31,473/-) and B:C ratio (3.99) were recorded with pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1061 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This system had maximum land equivalent ratio of 1.62.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportione0
Outcome
land equivalent ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.62e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportion. This system also registered maximum land equivalent ratio (1.62), monetary advantage index (Rs. 74,176 ha-1) and system relative crowding coefficient (9.86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1219 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This system had maximum monetary advantage index of Rs. 74,176 ha-1.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportione0
Outcome
monetary advantage indexe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Rs. 74,176 ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportion. This system also registered maximum land equivalent ratio (1.62), monetary advantage index (Rs. 74,176 ha-1) and system relative crowding coefficient (9.86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1219 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This system had maximum relative crowding coefficient of 9.86.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportione0
Outcome
system relative crowding coefficiente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.86e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea: french bean =2:2 proportion. This system also registered maximum land equivalent ratio (1.62), monetary advantage index (Rs. 74,176 ha-1) and system relative crowding coefficient (9.86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1219 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aggressivity and competition ratios indicated french bean dominance over pigeon pea.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
french beane0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aggressivity and competition ratio indicated that french bean and cowpea were dominant on pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1321 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aggressivity and competition ratios indicated cowpea dominance over pigeon pea.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Outcome
cowpeae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aggressivity and competition ratio indicated that french bean and cowpea were dominant on pigeon pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1321 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.