Paper · 2022 · Agronomy Journal

Maximizing spring wheat productivity in the eastern Canadian Prairies: I. Yield, yield components, and lodging risk

Amy Mangin; Anita Brûlé‐Babel; Don Flaten; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) yields across the Canadian prairies are rising, however, a yield gap remains between average yield and yield potential, which can be explored further under Prairie conditions. The high rates of nitrogen (N) fertilizer required for current high‐yielding cultivars may increase lodging risk adding to this yield gap. The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of intensive management through N fertilization and plant growth regulator (PGR) application, on grain yield, yield components, and their relationships, in addition to lodging risk. Field trials were conducted at two locations in 2018 and 2019 in Manitoba, Canada, to evaluate three high‐yielding spring wheat cultivars, three N management strategies, and the application of a PGR. Kernels per spike had the strongest overall linear relationship with grain yield ( r 2 = .47), while the response of spikes per plant was highly related to yield response with alterations in N and PGR management practices ( r 2 = .98). Splitting N fertilizer applications showed potential to reduce lodging risk of spring wheat, while maintaining yield and increasing protein. The PGR applications reduced lodging and increased grain yield by 91 kg ha −1 mainly through increases in kernels per spike. To achieve consistent yield increases, management practices should maximize early season N availability to target increases in spikes per plant and kernels per spike, thus a PGR application may be required to balance increased lodging risk.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernels per spike had the strongest linear relationship with grain yield (r²=.47).

Organ / stage
Kernels per spikee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
r 2 = .47e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Kernels per spike had the strongest overall linear relationship with grain yield ( r 2 = .47)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–897 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The response of spikes per plant was strongly related to yield response under changes in N and PGR management (r²=.98).

Treatment
alterations in N and PGR management practicese0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Value
r 2 = .98e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the response of spikes per plant was highly related to yield response with alterations in N and PGR management practices ( r 2 = .98)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting nitrogen applications showed potential to reduce wheat lodging risk.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Splitting N fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
lodging riske0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Splitting N fertilizer applications showed potential to reduce lodging risk of spring wheat, while maintaining yield and increasing protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting nitrogen applications showed potential to maintain wheat yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Splitting N fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maintaininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Splitting N fertilizer applications showed potential to reduce lodging risk of spring wheat, while maintaining yield and increasing protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Splitting nitrogen applications showed potential to increase wheat protein.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Splitting N fertilizer applicationse0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Splitting N fertilizer applications showed potential to reduce lodging risk of spring wheat, while maintaining yield and increasing protein”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR applications reduced lodging.

Treatment
PGR applicationse0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The PGR applications reduced lodging and increased grain yield by 91 kg ha −1 mainly through increases in kernels per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR applications increased grain yield by 91 kg ha −1.

Treatment
PGR applicationse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
91 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The PGR applications reduced lodging and increased grain yield by 91 kg ha −1 mainly through increases in kernels per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1304 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR yield gains were mainly linked to more kernels per spike.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
mainly through increases in kernels per spikee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield by 91 kg ha −1 mainly through increases in kernels per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1304 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Management should maximize early season nitrogen availability to increase spikes per plant and kernels per spike.

Treatment
early season N availabilitye0
Outcome
increases in spikes per plant and kernels per spikee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“management practices should maximize early season N availability to target increases in spikes per plant and kernels per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1471 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

PGR application may be required to balance increased lodging risk.

Treatment
PGR applicatione0
Outcome
balance increased lodging riske0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“a PGR application may be required to balance increased lodging risk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1545 · show in text ↑

class · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

class · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 100 positive, 17 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
    Split N application increased 1000-kernel weight at two site-years.

    Timing and Level of Nitrogen Fertility Effects on Spring Wheat Yield in Eastern Canada · 1994 · compared with application of all the fertilizer N at seeding

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.