Paper · 2022 · Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

Effects of Protaetia brevitarsis Larvae Manure Application on Lettuce Growth and Soil Chemical Properties

Kyong-Hee Joung; Jong-Won Kim; Seul-Bi Lee; et al.

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Agricultural land application of Protaetia brevitarsis larvae manure (PM) is a common process that improves soil fertility and increases crop production. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of PM on the growth of lettuce and soil chemical properties. Lettuce was planted in silt loam soil amended with three rates of PM 0 (CF), 540 (CFP1), and 1,080 (CFP2) kg 10a -1 with chemical fertilizer (20.0 kg 10a -1 N, 5.9 kg 10a -1 P 2 O 5 , and 12.8 kg 10a -1 K 2 O) and animal mixed compost 540 kg 10a -1 with chemical fertilizer (CFC). Increasing rates of PM caused a significant increase in soil organic matter content and yield of lettuce compared to CF (P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that Protaetia brevitarsis larvae manure can be used as an organic fertilizer to raise crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing manure rates significantly increased lettuce yield relative to no manure.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Increasing rates of PMe0
Outcome
yield of lettucee0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing rates of PM caused a significant increase in soil organic matter content and yield of lettuce compared to CF (P < 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing manure rates significantly increased soil organic matter relative to no manure.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Increasing rates of PMe0
Outcome
soil organic matter contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing rates of PM caused a significant increase in soil organic matter content and yield of lettuce compared to CF (P < 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–683 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest using Protaetia brevitarsis larvae manure as organic fertilizer to raise crops.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
Protaetia brevitarsis larvae manure can be used as an organic fertilizer to raise cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our findings suggest that Protaetia brevitarsis larvae manure can be used as an organic fertilizer to raise crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–76 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

249 papers: 213 positive, 36 negative or no effect

212 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

245 papers more in this group

See all 249 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.