Paper · 2022 · Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor

Estimation of Combining Ability In 10x10 Diallel Crosses Of Bread Wheat Grown Under Normal Irrigation and Salinity Stress Treatment for Some Morphological Physiological Traits

Wafaa Ali; M El; A El-Badawy; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A10x10 half diallel cross were made in 2018/2019 season. Each of parents and their 45 F1 crosses were evaluated under two locations (Ras Sudr and Moshtohor) during 2019/2020 season for some physiological traits. Highly significant genotypes, for genotype and its partitioning (parent, crosses and Parent vs crosses) and both types of combining ability mean squares (MS) were obtained for all studied traits under salinity stress , normal and across locations. Meanwhile, significant G x L, parent x L and cross x L were significant for all studied trails except peduncle leaf. Interaction between GCA or SCA and location MS were significant for all studied traits. the ratio between GCA/ SCA were more than unity for all traits except, flag leaf angle in salinity stress, normal condition and combined analysis, as well as relative water content in normal condition and combined analysis. P2 (Shandwel 1) exhibited significant positive ĝi effects for flag leaf area ,peduncle leaf and relative water content in both and cross location and total chlorophyll in Ras-sudr location ,indicating that (Shandwel 1)could be considered as a good combiner for this trails. The most desirable inter and intra allelic interactions were presented by P3 x P4 for flag leaf angle, P3 x P10 for flag leaf area; P7 x P8 for peduncle leaf; P1 x P10 for relative water content and P2 x P5 for total chlorophyll exhibited significant positive effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype and combining ability mean squares were highly significant for all studied traits under salinity, normal and across locations.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
salinity stresse1
Outcome
combining ability mean squarese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highly significant genotypes, for genotype and its partitioning (parent, crosses and Parent vs crosses) and both types of combining ability mean squares (MS) were obtained for all studied traits under salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–428 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

G x L, parent x L and cross x L interactions were significant for all traits except peduncle leaf.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
G x L, parent x L and cross x Le2
Qualifier
except peduncle leafe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meanwhile, significant G x L, parent x L and cross x L were significant for all studied trails except peduncle leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–575 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GCA/SCA ratio was more than unity for most traits.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
GCA/ SCAe3
Value
more than unitye3
Qualifier
flag leaf angle in salinity stresse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“the ratio between GCA/ SCA were more than unity for all traits except, flag leaf angle in salinity stress, normal condition and combined analysis, as well as relative water content in normal condition and combined analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–887 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P2 (Shandwel 1) showed significant positive GCA effects for flag leaf area, peduncle leaf and relative water content at both locations.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
P2 (Shandwel 1)e4
Outcome
ĝi effectse4
Setting
Ras Sudr and Moshtohore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“evaluated under two locations (Ras Sudr and Moshtohor) during 2019/2020 season for some physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–210 · show in text ↑
e4

“P2 (Shandwel 1) exhibited significant positive ĝi effects for flag leaf area ,peduncle leaf and relative water content in both and cross location and total chlorophyll in Ras-sudr location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1077 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P2 (Shandwel 1) showed significant positive GCA effect for total chlorophyll at Ras-sudr location.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
P2 (Shandwel 1)e4
Outcome
total chlorophylle4
Setting
Ras-sudr locatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e4

“P2 (Shandwel 1) exhibited significant positive ĝi effects for flag leaf area ,peduncle leaf and relative water content in both and cross location and total chlorophyll in Ras-sudr location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1077 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 x P4 was among the most desirable crosses for flag leaf angle, with significant positive effects.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
P3 x P4e5
Outcome
flag leaf anglee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“The most desirable inter and intra allelic interactions were presented by P3 x P4 for flag leaf angle, P3 x P10 for flag leaf area; P7 x P8 for peduncle leaf; P1 x P10 for relative water content and P2 x P5 for total chlorophyll exhibited significant positive effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P3 x P10 was among the most desirable crosses for flag leaf area, with significant positive effects.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
P3 x P10e5
Outcome
flag leaf areae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“The most desirable inter and intra allelic interactions were presented by P3 x P4 for flag leaf angle, P3 x P10 for flag leaf area; P7 x P8 for peduncle leaf; P1 x P10 for relative water content and P2 x P5 for total chlorophyll exhibited significant positive effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P7 x P8 was among the most desirable crosses for peduncle leaf, with significant positive effects.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
P7 x P8e5
Outcome
peduncle leafe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“The most desirable inter and intra allelic interactions were presented by P3 x P4 for flag leaf angle, P3 x P10 for flag leaf area; P7 x P8 for peduncle leaf; P1 x P10 for relative water content and P2 x P5 for total chlorophyll exhibited significant positive effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P1 x P10 was among the most desirable crosses for relative water content, with significant positive effects.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
P1 x P10e5
Outcome
relative water contente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“The most desirable inter and intra allelic interactions were presented by P3 x P4 for flag leaf angle, P3 x P10 for flag leaf area; P7 x P8 for peduncle leaf; P1 x P10 for relative water content and P2 x P5 for total chlorophyll exhibited significant positive effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P2 x P5 was among the most desirable crosses for total chlorophyll, with significant positive effects.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
P2 x P5e5
Outcome
total chlorophylle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–71 · show in text ↑
e5

“The most desirable inter and intra allelic interactions were presented by P3 x P4 for flag leaf angle, P3 x P10 for flag leaf area; P7 x P8 for peduncle leaf; P1 x P10 for relative water content and P2 x P5 for total chlorophyll exhibited significant positive effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1430 · show in text ↑